Because you have preferred a lie to the truth.
"Ouch."
Because you have preferred a lie to the truth.
Jesus the Christ is my Lord and Savior and that is why I am a Christian.
So, no verse then. And that doesn't even bother you. Bothered my right out of the RCC.So, then, no actual refutation whatsoever; that's what I thought.
Your demand for a "verse" for every Christian belief and behavior rests entirely upon the heterodox 16th-century Protestant notion of sola scriptura, which is itself nowhere taught in "Scripture alone," and so which simply and directly refutes itself. Catholics do not buy into the unbiblical and invented notion of sola scriptura, and so are not required to find every belief or behavior spelled out explicitly in the Bible. Try again.
Not even close (see just above).
According to the entirely non-authoritative opinions of your preferred recently-invented, man-made non-Catholic sect, perhaps, but according to the authoritative teachings of Christ's one historic Church, Baptism is the normative means of regeneration (i.e., being "born again") and initiation into the Body of Christ, the Church.That just gets you wet.
A Mormon I know also claims that "Jesus the Christ is my Lord and Savior and that is why I am a Christian." Guess it takes a bit more than merely making a claim to rightfully consider oneself a "Christian."Check and mate.
None required, since Catholics do not follow the false and unbiblical Protestant invention known as sola scriptura. You need to have an explicit proof-text for every belief; we do not.So, no verse then.
And yet you're not at all bothered that your foundational doctrine---the one on which all other doctrines are based---is itself both demonstrably irrational and entirely unbiblical. Bothered me right out of Protestantism.And that doesn't even bother you. Bothered my right out of the RCC.
:yawn: Who cares about my opinion? What is God's opinion? oly:[No Assurance in Infant Baptism ] According to the entirely non-authoritative opinions...
:yawn: Faulty Comparison Eph 4:14A Mormon I know also claims that...Jesus the Christ is my Lord and Savior...
It doesn't bother me to follow what Jesus actually taught. I find it sad that Catholic's don't feel the need to follow what Christ actually taught, that they comfortable following what men think Jesus should have taught.None required, since Catholics do not follow the false and unbiblical Protestant invention known as sola scriptura. You need to have an explicit proof-text for every belief; we do not.
And yet you're not at all bothered that your foundational doctrine---the one on which all other doctrines are based---is itself both demonstrably irrational and entirely unbiblical. Bothered me right out of Protestantism.
If your Morman friend has confessed with his mouth what he believes in his heart that Jesus is Lord, then he is saved. Who are you to judge him?A Mormon I know also claims that "Jesus the Christ is my Lord and Savior and that is why I am a Christian." Guess it takes a bit more than merely making a claim to rightfully consider oneself a "Christian."
So much for your "Check and mate." :yawn:
Who cares about your opinions regarding what constitutes God's opinion? (Besides you, apparently.)Who cares about my opinion? What is God's opinion?
Guess what he hasn't magnified above his name?---serpent's personal interpretations (opinions) of God's word.You have magnified Your word above all Your name (Ps 138:2).
In fact, it's an exact comparison. Try again.Faulty Comparison.
Let the reader decide (Eph 4:14). each:[Ps 138:2] Guess what he hasn't magnified above his name?
You removed the scripture from my quote. linger: It is what you do. :Shimei:Faulty Comparison.
Let the reader decide. each:...t's an exact comparison
Except that you confine "what Jesus taught" to "the Bible ALONE," an invented 16th-century Protestant notion that has already been categorically refuted on this very thread [SOURCE]It doesn't bother me to follow what Jesus actually taught.
In fact, it's you who doesn't follow "what Christ actually taught," but only the part recorded in the Bible, and you follow that only according to the fallible and non-authoritative opinions of your chosen recently-invented, man-made non-Catholic sect.I find it sad that Catholic's don't feel the need to follow what Christ actually taught...
Straw Man Fallacy, since Catholics certainly don't claim that Mary "died for the forgiveness of sins." Try again. See if just once you can describe Catholic teaching accurately and honestly.Jesus died for the forgiveness of sins, not Mary.
Here is what Scripture teaches regarding the Communion of Saints.Jesus said to pray to His Father, not Mary.
When your fellow Christians pray for you, are they "manipulating the Son on your behalf"? Is that what you do when you pray for others? Are you being deliberately dense?In essence, you ask her to manipulate her Son on your behalf.
Of course I do! The only record of the what Jesus said and taught is in the Holy Scripture. The RCC-catichism does not have any teachings of Jesus, it has mens interpretations of what they think Jesus and others should have said.Except that you confine "what Jesus taught" to "the Bible ALONE," an invented 16th-century Protestant notion that has already been categorically refuted on this very thread [SOURCE]
Really? Can you show me where Jesus said I had to a be a part of the Roman Catholic sect by name? how about Peter? how about Paul? Andrew? Timothy? Anybody who actually walked with Christ? No? Didn't think so.In fact, it's you who doesn't follow "what Christ actually taught," but only the part recorded in the Bible, and you follow that only according to the fallible and non-authoritative opinions of your chosen recently-invented, man-made non-Catholic sect.
If she didn't die for your sins, if she was not sent for the forgiveness of your sins, then why do you "talk to her on bended knee, folded hand and bowed head but not pray" to her?Straw Man Fallacy, since Catholics certainly don't claim that Mary "died for the forgiveness of sins." Try again. See if just once you can describe Catholic teaching accurately and honestly.
Here
No, that is what the men of the Roman Magisterium say about what scripture says about the communion of the saints. Lets look at what Jesus said about prayer:is what Scripture teaches regarding the Communion of Saints.
When your fellow Christians pray for you, are they "manipulating the Son on your behalf"? Is that what you do when you pray for others? Are you being deliberately dense?
This is your claim? Even though Mormons believe, among other things:If your Morman friend has confessed with his mouth what he believes in his heart that Jesus is Lord, then he is saved.
What kind of Christian refuses to "test the spirits" (1 Jn. 4:1) to see whether they comport with the authoritative teachings of Christ's one historic Church (Mt. 28:18-20; Lk. 10:16; Ac. 15:2; 16:4; Rom. 16:17; 2 Thess. 3:4; 1 Tim. 3:15; 1 Jn. 4:6)?Who are you to judge him?