Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 7

[Idolater]

I explained your problem in this post: https://theologyonline.com/threads/...t-be-recriminalized-part-7.56961/post-1918435

Have you forgotten already?

And I didn't explain already but as the thread shows, I was responding to a post that I made, where I said the president won the popular vote, which I meant as winning a majority, and so I answered my own post and clarified that he didn't win a majority.

I meant 'the popular vote' to mean the majority. I was clarifying what I meant, when I responded to my own post. Just like you did with this, your post.

 

[Avajs]

The problem isn't faggots, it's faggotism, which is the ideology that wants to faggotize everything. So far, faggotism has made tremendous, epic inroads to Western Culture (with the exception of basically Japan).

There are faggots who aren't faggotists. Most faggotists, by a wide margin, are not themselves faggots. Faggotry and faggotism are not the same thing and aren't even necessarily surjective onto one another. There are those engaging in faggotry, who are not faggotists, and don't promote or tolerate the faggotist agenda or ideological goals. Although this latter is a hopeful speculation, as I haven't seen any example of this species of person. For the most part, it seems the only faggots who aren't faggotists, aren't practicing faggotry, they are celibate and chaste. This would rule out someone like Dave Rubin, who "is married", and so is in a very public state of not being celibate. David Rubin also acquired children to parent them with "his husband." Gay marriage and gay children acquisition are faggotized. 100% faggotism. Right there, that's their agenda and ideology. In real

Well your post made me look up Dave Rubin. After that my response to your entire post is “who cares?”.