Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 4

[MrDante]

Thanks for the updated link. I've been using 2011 information from the CDC that Peter LaBarbera at Americans For Truth About Homosexuality had on his website sometime ago.

Different years, same type of behavior that is overwhelmingly responsible for contracting HIV/AIDS.

Estimated New HIV Diagnoses Among the Most-Affected Subpopulations, 2014—United States

https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/images/group/msm/msm-graph-800x325.png
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/

wow...a three year old estimate. :juggle:

 

[MrDante]

I didn't ask about AFT. I asked about the Centers for Disease Control.

Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Too bad. Americans for truth is the link source and aCW's go to source for junk science and fake information.

 

[JudgeRightly]

Too bad. Americans for truth is the link source and aCW's go to source for junk science and fake information.

Again, is the CDC a hate group?

If not, then it stands to reason that they wouldn't post something like that on their website if there wasn't any truth to it.

Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

 

[MrDante]

Again, is the CDC a hate group?

If not, then it stands to reason that they wouldn't post something like that on their website if there wasn't any truth to it.

Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Is the CDC claiming that HIV is a gay disease? No.
Is the CDC pretending that the AIDS crisis in Africa is a hoax? No
Is the CDC making sick, racists claims? No.

And that is because the CDC isn't a hate group.

Will you have the honesty and integrity to acknowledge this? :ha:

More likely you will try to pretend that years old statistics about teenage boys provides facts about the HIV rate in Africa.

 

[JudgeRightly]

Is the CDC claiming that HIV is a gay disease? No.
Is the CDC pretending that the AIDS crisis in Africa is a hoax? No
Is the CDC making sick, racists claims? No.

And that is because the CDC isn't a hate group.

I'm glad you finally answered my question. Thank you.

Will you have the honesty and integrity to acknowledge this? :ha:

More likely you will try to pretend that years old statistics about teenage boys provides facts about the HIV rate in Africa.

The CDC posted statistics from a study that shows that at least in America, yes, indeed, HIV is a "gay disease."

As far as I can tell, the study says nothing about HIV in Africa,

The study states quite clearly that "From 2005 to 2014, HIV diagnoses decreased in the United States by 19% overall, but increased 6% among all gay and bisexual men, driven by increases among African American and Hispanic/Latino gay and bisexual men."

Not racist, but then neither aCW nor I claim it to be such. Do you? If so, why?

Does it stand to reason, seeing as the CDC is not a hate group, that they wouldn't post such statistics in the first place if it wasn't such a widespread issue?

And does the evidence they presented support your stance that HIV is not a "gay disease" or our (mine and aCW's) claim that homosexuality is inherently destructive, as it brings disease to those who partake in such acts?

Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

 

[aCultureWarrior]

I'm glad you finally answered my question. Thank you.

The CDC posted statistics from a study that shows that at least in America, yes, indeed, HIV is a "gay disease."

As far as I can tell, the study says nothing about HIV in Africa,

I'll ask the question again: Why in sexually promiscuous western societies is HIV/AIDS disproportionately contracted by homosexual males, yet in Africa it's considered a heterosexual disease?

http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4956074&viewfull=1#post4956074

Could it be that the multi billion dollar AIDS industry knows that if people knew that it is a disease that disproportionately effects homosexual males and bisexuals, which is a miniscule percent of the population, that they wouldn't get the funding that they currently do? (always follow the money trail).

Here are a couple of articles show what is really behind the sickness in Africa: Lack of clean water, poor sanitation and malnutrition.

As for the difference between African AIDS and American/European AIDS Duesberg says, "The African AIDS epidemic has only one thing in common with the American/European AIDS epidemic - the name. African AIDS is caused by malnutrition, parasitic infection and poor sanitation. There are no risk groups in Africa, like drug addicts and homosexuals. It is for this reason that African AIDS is equally distributed between the sexes. Moreover, practically no African AIDS patients have pneumocystis pneumonia, dementia or Kaposi's sarcoma - the signal diseases of AIDS in the US and Europe. Above all, African AIDS is diagnosed without even attempting an HIV test, which is too expensive for Africa. Thus there is no scientific evidence for the correlation between HIV and African AIDS, only guesses."
http://www.newscastmedia.com/aids-hoax.html

The practice of widening the definitions of diseases diagnosed as AIDS also concerns Prof Jerndal. At least twenty-nine different illnesses that existed before AIDS are considered as AIDS when they are accompanied by a HIV positive test. But there are more than sixty different conditions that can cause a positive result that bear no relation to HIV or AIDS. Jerndals' message is that the world has been sold the unproven HIV causes AIDS dogma along with a fatal drugs regime of conventional medicine that goes with it.
Misdiagnoses can have a devastating effect on the life of a patient and aside from inaccurate results a positive test for HIV is by no means predictive of the development of AIDS [5]. But, so far no real distinction is made between the two [6]. Worse still, in Africa, an AIDS diagnoses can mean existing treatment is withheld altogether because of the entirely unjustified fatal prognosis attached to the illness.
In whose interests would the creation of numbers of people suffering from a fatal disease in epic proportions? In the US in 2000, under President Clinton, AIDS in Africa, not in the US, was declared a matter of national security. It was suggested that while AIDS was confined to the homosexual community in the US, it was containable, but once heterosexual transmission had been established in Africa then everyone had a reason to panic and AIDS budgets soared [3].
All Africans are being unfairly labelled as insatiable, sexually promiscuous, reckless people while their key issue of poverty remains ignored. Statistics report HIV rates of infection as high as 25% in some African countries and more women than men are infected [7]. World Bank statistics for those living with AIDS in sub-Saharan African are at 29.4 million while in Cairo, Egypt, a short boat trip down the river, reveals 215 cases of HIV/AIDS in a population of 65 million [8].
http://www.alkalizeforhealth.net/Library/healthfraud5.htm

And there you have it, the Africa HIV/AIDS hoax has been revealed.

https://socialmediasoup.files.wordp...-scam-hoax-rubber-stamps-149902340.jpg?w=1200

 

[MrDante]

I'm glad you finally answered my question. Thank you.



The CDC posted statistics from a study that shows that at least in America, yes, indeed, HIV is a "gay disease."

no, aCW posted a CDC slide from the hate group American's For Truth about HIV diagnosis in 13 - 19 year olds.

As far as I can tell, the study says nothing about HIV in Africa,

The study states quite clearly that "From 2005 to 2014, HIV diagnoses decreased in the United States by 19% overall, but increased 6% among all gay and bisexual men, driven by increases among African American and Hispanic/Latino gay and bisexual men."

Not racist, but then neither aCW nor I claim it to be such. Do you? If so, why?

try reading the posts

Does it stand to reason, seeing as the CDC is not a hate group, that they wouldn't post such statistics in the first place if it wasn't such a widespread issue?

Boy I called that one didn't I?

And does the evidence they presented support your stance that HIV is not a "gay disease" or our (mine and aCW's) claim that homosexuality is inherently destructive, as it brings disease to those who partake in such acts?

Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

An old cherry picked slide plucked form the web site of a hate group is only evidence of the lengths some people will go to try and justify their own prejudice.

 

[MrDante]

I'll ask the question again: Why in sexually promiscuous western societies is HIV/AIDS disproportionately contracted by homosexual males, yet in Africa it's considered a heterosexual disease?

http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4956074&viewfull=1#post4956074

question 1: how many African countries were surveyed in the research the newspaper clipping you linked? Were any?

If there weren't any then your claim that western societies are promiscuous where African societies are not is so much garbage.

If any African countries were surveyed just what is the statistical difference between them and the Brits?

I won't hold my breath waiting for an answer because we all know you won't.

Could it be that the multi billion dollar AIDS industry knows that if people knew that it is a disease that disproportionately effects homosexual males and bisexuals, which is a miniscule percent of the population, that they wouldn't get the funding that they currently do? (always follow the money trail).

What do you mean? The claim that AIDS is a "gay disease" has been the go to lie for every bigot, hate group and uneducated redneck for the last 35 years.

Here are a couple of articles show what is really behind the sickness in Africa: Lack of clean water, poor sanitation and malnutrition.

how does malnutrition lead to women giving birth to HIV positive children?

As for the difference between African AIDS and American/European AIDS Duesberg says, "The African AIDS epidemic has only one thing in common with the American/European AIDS epidemic - the name. African AIDS is caused by malnutrition, parasitic infection and poor sanitation. There are no risk groups in Africa, like drug addicts and homosexuals. It is for this reason that African AIDS is equally distributed between the sexes. Moreover, practically no African AIDS patients have pneumocystis pneumonia,

8% of all AIDS related deaths in adults in Africa are caused by pneumocystis pneumonia, several times the rate in the United States

dementia

AIDS related dementia affects 31% of HIV infected adults in sub-Saharan Africa. Sacktor D. et al HIV-Associated Cognitive Impairment in Sub-Saharan Africa J of Metabolic brain disease

or Kaposi's sarcoma -

Kaposi sarcoma is the most frequently diagnosed form of cancer in Angola, the Central African Republic, Chad, Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Gambia, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mali, Mauritania, Somalia, South Africa and Zimbabwe. Mosama A. and Baker J. Kaposi's sarcoma in sub-Saharan Africa: a current perspective. J of infection disease

the signal diseases of AIDS in the US and Europe.

Above all, African AIDS is diagnosed without even attempting an HIV test, which is too expensive for Africa. Thus there is no scientific evidence for the correlation between HIV and African AIDS, only guesses."

http://www.newscastmedia.com/aids-hoax.html

in 2016 the world health organization administered 14 million hiv tests in sub-Saharan Africa.

The practice of widening the definitions of diseases diagnosed as AIDS also concerns Prof Jerndal. At least twenty-nine different illnesses that existed before AIDS are considered as AIDS when they are accompanied by a HIV positive test. But there are more than sixty different conditions that can cause a positive result that bear no relation to HIV or AIDS. Jerndals' message is that the world has been sold the unproven HIV causes AIDS dogma along with a fatal drugs regime of conventional medicine that goes with it.
Misdiagnoses can have a devastating effect on the life of a patient and aside from inaccurate results a positive test for HIV is by no means predictive of the development of AIDS [5]. But, so far no real distinction is made between the two [6]. Worse still, in Africa, an AIDS diagnoses can mean existing treatment is withheld altogether because of the entirely unjustified fatal prognosis attached to the illness.

50% of HIV infected adults in sub-Saharan Africa receive anti-viral treatment.

In whose interests would the creation of numbers of people suffering from a fatal disease in epic proportions? In the US in 2000, under President Clinton, AIDS in Africa, not in the US, was declared a matter of national security. It was suggested that while AIDS was confined to the homosexual community in the US, it was containable, but once heterosexual transmission had been established in Africa then everyone had a reason to panic and AIDS budgets soared [3].
All Africans are being unfairly labelled as insatiable, sexually promiscuous, reckless people while their key issue of poverty remains ignored. Statistics report HIV rates of infection as high as 25% in some African countries and more women than men are infected [7]. World Bank statistics for those living with AIDS in sub-Saharan African are at 29.4 million while in Cairo, Egypt, a short boat trip down the river, reveals 215 cases of HIV/AIDS in a population of 65 million [8].

http://www.alkalizeforhealth.net/Library/healthfraud5.htm

And there you have it, the Africa HIV/AIDS hoax has been revealed.

https://socialmediasoup.files.wordp...-scam-hoax-rubber-stamps-149902340.jpg?w=1200

Fraud pretty accurately describes your links.

 

[JudgeRightly]

What do you mean?

He means that there's more factors involved than just how many people are affected by HIV, such as the percentage of homos in a society. His point is that there are far more homos here in America, and not as many in Africa, which is why the percentages are different for America vs Africa.

Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior

I'll ask the question again: Why in sexually promiscuous western societies is HIV/AIDS disproportionately contracted by homosexual males, yet in Africa it's considered a heterosexual disease?
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4956074&viewfull=1#post4956074

question 1: how many African countries were surveyed in the research the newspaper clipping you linked? Were any?

I must have missed your answer to my above question. Putting aside the sexual promiscuity of your LGBTQ movement (one only need look at 'gay' pride parades and festivals, LGBTQ film festivals and periodicals to confirm that statement), can you explain why westernized societies which embrace pornography, out of wedlock sex, adultery and abortion aren't infected by HIV/AIDS, and African countries whose laws and cultural mores' don't glory the above are?

If there weren't any then your claim that western societies are promiscuous where African societies are not is so much garbage.

I don't know why the survey, which talked about countries such as Turkey, Taiwan and Croatia (which the last time I checked aren't considered "westernized societies") would leave Africa out.

This 2008 article talks about the low promiscuity rate in Zimbabwe, which according to my map is in Africa.
http://www.economist.com/node/12755557

If any African countries were surveyed just what is the statistical difference between them and the Brits?

I won't hold my breath waiting for an answer because we all know you won't.

How about you give me an answer to my first question and then we'll go from there?

Here it is again:

Putting aside the sexual promiscuity of your LGBTQ movement (one only need look at 'gay' pride parades and festivals, LGBTQ film festivals and periodicals to confirm that statement), can you explain why westernized societies which embrace pornography, out of wedlock sex, adultery and abortion aren't infected by HIV/AIDS, and African countries whose laws and cultural mores' don't glory the above are?


Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Could it be that the multi billion dollar AIDS industry knows that if people knew that it is a disease that disproportionately effects homosexual males and bisexuals, which is a miniscule percent of the population, that they wouldn't get the funding that they currently do? (always follow the money trail).

What do you mean? The claim that AIDS is a "gay disease" has been the go to lie for every bigot, hate group and uneducated redneck for the last 35 years.

Now now ...Dante, don't go calling Matt Foreman, the former head of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF) names like that.

Homosexual Leader Calls AIDS 'a Gay Disease'
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
As for the difference between African AIDS and American/European AIDS Duesberg says, "The African AIDS epidemic has only one thing in common with the American/European AIDS epidemic - the name. African AIDS is caused by malnutrition, parasitic infection and poor sanitation. There are no risk groups in Africa, like drug addicts and homosexuals. It is for this reason that African AIDS is equally distributed between the sexes. Moreover, practically no African AIDS patients have pneumocystis pneumonia,..

8% of all AIDS related deaths in adults in Africa are caused by pneumocystis pneumonia, several times the rate in the United States

I know that this is asking a lot, but could you back your claims with links?

Now be a good little boy and go edit the post that I'm replying to with links and we'll continue from there.

Here, let me help: https://www.avert.org/professionals/hiv-around-world/sub-saharan-africa/zimbabwe

Oh and ...Dante, don't forget to get tested!

http://img.thebody.com/thebody/2015/bhivsure-couple1.jpg

 

[JudgeRightly]

out of wedlock sex

Let's just call it what it is: fornication. :thumb:

Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

 

[JudgeRightly]

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/

Your link is incomplete.

Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Your link is incomplete.

Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Let's try these:

Top “Gay” Organization Comes Clean: “HIV is a gay disease.”
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/top-gay-organization-comes-clean-hiv-is-a-gay-disease

News Release: AIDS is a “Gay Disease”
http://afaofpa.org/archives/news-release-aids-is-a-gay-disease/

"Folks, with 70 percent of the people in this country living with HIV being gay or bi, we cannot deny that HIV is a gay disease. We have to own that and face up to that."
-Matt Foreman, the former head of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF)

http://citizenchris.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/01/23/mattforemanhand.jpg

 

[MrDante]

He means that there's more factors involved than just how many people are affected by HIV, such as the percentage of homos in a society. His point is that there are far more homos here in America, and not as many in Africa, which is why the percentages are different for America vs Africa.

Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

the question was rhetorical.


I have read some very stupid posts on TOL. This one outshines them all.

 

[MrDante]

I must have missed your answer to my above question. Putting aside the sexual promiscuity of your LGBTQ movement (one only need look at 'gay' pride parades and festivals, LGBTQ film festivals and periodicals to confirm that statement),

only if one is a pathohlogical liar.

Any honest person woudl look at actual research on the subject, studies that actually compare the numbers of sexual partners gays have compared to the number of sexual partners straights have. A moral person would actually look at that research and discover that gays aren't any more promiscuous.

That would be what a decent and honest person would do. But we are talking about you.

can you explain why westernized societies which embrace pornography, out of wedlock sex, adultery and abortion aren't infected by HIV/AIDS, and African countries whose laws and cultural mores' don't glory the above are?

Evidence supporting these differences in cultural mores? Well of course you won't ever provide any.

I don't know why the survey, which talked about countries such as Turkey, Taiwan and Croatia (which the last time I checked aren't considered "westernized societies") would leave Africa out.

This 2008 article talks about the low promiscuity rate in Zimbabwe, which according to my map is in Africa.
http://www.economist.com/node/12755557



How about you give me an answer to my first question and then we'll go from there?

wow...one African country.


One has to wonder if 40 years of the AIDS epidemic (23% of adult women in Zimbabwe are infected with HIV.) has something to do with attitudes about sex. Hmmmmmmmm

Now now ...Dante, don't go calling Matt Foreman, the former head of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF) names like that.

in the same statement he compared "AIDS is a gay disease" claims to Tay-Sachs is a Jewish disease and sickle-cell anemia an African American disease. How racist and anti-semetic groups use diseases which are not exclusive to wither Jews or African Americans as a means to promote hate, discrimination, violence and even the killing of Jews and blacks.

But I suppose you would rather not talk about this.

I know that this is asking a lot, but could you back your claims with links?

From you that is rich.:rotfl:

Now be a good little boy and go edit the post that I'm replying to with links and we'll continue from there.

Here, let me help: https://www.avert.org/professionals/hiv-around-world/sub-saharan-africa/zimbabwe

Oh and ...Dante, don't forget to get tested!

http://img.thebody.com/thebody/2015/bhivsure-couple1.jpg

Awww...are you upset your lies got confronted with facts... again.



Well having your lies exposed has never stopped you form repeating your false witness time and time again.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
I must have missed your answer to my above question. Putting aside the sexual promiscuity of your LGBTQ movement (one only need look at 'gay' pride parades and festivals, LGBTQ film festivals and periodicals to confirm that statement), can you explain why westernized societies which embrace pornography, out of wedlock sex, adultery and abortion aren't infected by HIV/AIDS, and African countries whose laws and cultural mores' don't glorify the above are?

only if one is a pathohlogical liar.

I've spent several minutes examining the above sentence, and gosh darn it ...Dante, I still don't see an answer to my above question.

Any honest person woudl look at actual research on the subject, studies that actually compare the numbers of sexual partners gays have compared to the number of sexual partners straights have. A moral person would actually look at that research and discover that gays aren't any more promiscuous.

I suppose I could talk about how cruising public restrooms, public park bushes and bathhouses for anonymous sex are a part of the 'gay' culture, or how 'married' couples like Dan Savage and the guy he met in a public restroom toilet stall have threesomes. I could even talk homosexual prostitution (and how the sodomites in the city of Sodom and Gonorrhea South, i.e. San Fransicko, had the legalization of prostitution on the ballot) and prostitution rings, etc. etc. etc., but those subjects has been discussed many times over.

Spoiler

http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4575545&viewfull=1#post4575545

Now, let's have some fun with ...Dante and see how many ways he can spin the following statement made by Matt Foreman, the former head of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF) :


"Folks, with 70 percent of the people in this country living with HIV being gay or bi, we cannot deny that HIV is a gay disease. We have to own that and face up to that."
-Matt Foreman, the former head of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF)

in the same statement he compared "AIDS is a gay disease" claims to Tay-Sachs is a Jewish disease and sickle-cell anemia an African American disease. How racist and anti-semetic groups use diseases which are not exclusive to wither Jews or African Americans as a means to promote hate, discrimination, violence and even the killing of Jews and blacks.

But I suppose you would rather not talk about this.

Come on ...Dante, you can do better than that, at least say that it was a typo and Foreman actually said the following:

'Folks, with .00000000000000000000000000070 percent of the people in this country living with HIV being gay or bi, we cannot deny that HIV is NOT a gay disease. We have to own that and face up to that we live a life that is pure as the driven snow.'

There, I feel better now that the truth has been told, I hope you do too ...Dante.

Moving on...

 

[MrDante]

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
I must have missed your answer to my above question. Putting aside the sexual promiscuity of your LGBTQ movement (one only need look at 'gay' pride parades and festivals, LGBTQ film festivals and periodicals to confirm that statement), can you explain why westernized societies which embrace pornography, out of wedlock sex, adultery and abortion aren't infected by HIV/AIDS, and African countries whose laws and cultural mores' don't glorify the above are?




I've spent several minutes examining the above sentence, and gosh darn it ...Dante, I still don't see an answer to my above question.

As i noted earlier your question is based on unsupported premises.

It seems that if you had spent time examining my post as you claim you would have noticed that.

I suppose I could talk about how cruising public restrooms, public park bushes and bathhouses for anonymous sex are a part of the 'gay' culture, or how 'married' couples like Dan Savage and the guy he met in a public restroom toilet stall have threesomes. I could even talk homosexual prostitution (and how the sodomites in the city of Sodom and Gonorrhea South, i.e. San Fransicko, had the legalization of prostitution on the ballot) and prostitution rings, etc. etc. etc., but those subjects has been discussed many times over.

I woudl be shocked beyond words if you didn't bring up these tired lies.

Sadly i don't think anyone dumb enough to not notice how you are running away form your fake claims about promiscuity. Well most arn't dumb enough....JudgeRightly, did you notice?

Spoiler

http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4575545&viewfull=1#post4575545

What do you know....there are books in poor taste for heterosexuals too.

Now, let's have some fun with ...Dante and see how many ways he can spin the following statement made by Matt Foreman, the former head of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF) :


"Folks, with 70 percent of the people in this country living with HIV being gay or bi, we cannot deny that HIV is a gay disease. We have to own that and face up to that."
-Matt Foreman, the former head of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF)

and he went on to say....

Come on ...Dante, you can do better than that, at least say that it was a typo and Foreman actually said the following:

'Folks, with .00000000000000000000000000070 percent of the people in this country living with HIV being gay or bi, we cannot deny that HIV is NOT a gay disease. We have to own that and face up to that we live a life that is pure as the driven snow.'

There, I feel better now that the truth has been told, I hope you do too ...Dante.

You are welcome. I am always happy to confront the lies you post here with the truth.

Moving on...

with your tail between your legs

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
I suppose I could talk about how cruising public restrooms, public park bushes and bathhouses for anonymous sex are a part of the 'gay' culture, or how 'married' couples like Dan Savage and the guy he met in a public restroom toilet stall have threesomes. I could even talk homosexual prostitution (and how the sodomites in the city of Sodom and Gonorrhea South, i.e. San Fransicko, had the legalization of prostitution on the ballot) and prostitution rings, etc. etc. etc., but those subjects has been discussed many times over.

What do you know....there are books in poor taste for heterosexuals too.

Let's not forget the adultery website "Ashley Madison".

https://media2.fdncms.com/arktimes/imager/u/original/4747104/ashley_madison.png

Which brings me back to my earlier question:

Putting aside the sexual promiscuity of your LGBTQ movement (one only need look at 'gay' pride parades and festivals, LGBTQ film festivals and periodicals to confirm that statement), can you explain why westernized societies which embrace pornography, out of wedlock sex, adultery and abortion aren't infected by HIV/AIDS, and African countries whose laws and cultural mores' don't glorify the above are?

 

[MrDante]

Which brings me back to my earlier question:

Putting aside the sexual promiscuity of your LGBTQ movement (one only need look at 'gay' pride parades and festivals, LGBTQ film festivals and periodicals to confirm that statement),

How can you put aside something that doesn't exist?

can you explain why westernized societies which embrace pornography, out of wedlock sex, adultery and abortion aren't infected by HIV/AIDS, and African countries whose laws and cultural mores' don't glorify the above are?

Are you repeating a bad question because its tough to type when running with your tail between your legs?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

A note to JudgeRightly:

I see that you reported ...Dante for posting a picture that is "pornographic in nature". Granted, this is a Christian website, but also remember that you're in a thread that deals with the reality of sexual perversion and immoral sexual practices, so unsavory subjects will be shown and discussed.

The left (liberal and Libertarian) are notorious for silencing their opposition. I silence the opposition via the truth, not banning them.

Please respect my wishes and allow open debate.

Thanks,
aCW