ok, let's work with that and see what traci's concept of "christianity" is all about
Since we're still on the topic of...
homosexual violence,
and are currently talking about genital mutilators and people 'trapped inside the body of the opposite gender' (who still have their original 'equipment'), I thought I'd post this article about a serial murderer out of Spookaloo WA.
Transsexual accused of serial killing: I didn’t kill those women because I’m a new person
SPOKANE, WA, March 19, 2014 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A suspected serial killer is offering an unusual defense to try to avoid punishment for murdering at least three women: Because he had a sex change operation in 2000 and now lives as a woman himself, he argues he is now a completely different person and cannot be held responsible for anything he may have done before the operation, reports KXLY.com.
Douglas Perry, 63, who now goes by “Donna,” was arrested late last year after DNA evidence linked him to the murders of prostitutes Yolanda Sapp, Kathleen Brisbois and Nickie Lowe, whose bodies were all found unclothed in the Spokane River in 1990 with fatal gunshot wounds. He is being held in Spokane County Jail under $1 million bond on three counts of first degree murder.
Police linked Perry to the murders of the three women using fingerprint evidence and DNA found under the victims’ fingernails. They also found the car Perry was driving at the time of the murders. Under the front passenger floor mat was a .22 caliber cartridge that was a perfect match to bullets recovered from the victims.
But Perry insists that as “Donna,” he’s never killed anyone, and that his new status as a woman means the alleged murderer no longer exists.
“I’m not going to admit I killed anybody,” Perry told investigators, according to court documents. “I didn’t. Donna has killed nobody.”
“Doug did,” replied a police officer.
“I don’t know if Doug did or not. It was 20 years ago and I have no idea whether he did or didn’t,” Perry said.
Court records show that Perry has been convicted in the past for felony assault, firearms and explosives violations, as well as for soliciting a prostitute in 1989 – just a year before the three women were killed. In 2012, he served time in a women’s prison in Texas for illegally purchasing firearms and ammunition as a felon, and reportedly told his female cellmate that he had killed nine prostitutes in Washington “because [he] couldn't breed and the women had the ability to have children and they were wasting it being ‘pond scum.’” He also called himself a “sociopath.”
I guess those kids haven't been to enough gay pride parades ey Al?
(Based on the look on the little boy's face, he must be a homophobic bigot).
This picture has been run through and analysed by FotoForensics software. There is no indication that it was photoshopped, and every indication it is valid.no, he's just not happy about being in a photo shopped picture
actions (or here post) speak louder than words and here your posts fly in the face of everything Jesus taught.
I don't think it probably was photoshopped either but take another look:This picture has been run through and analysed by FotoForensics software. There is no indication that it was photoshopped, and every indication it is valid.
I think they have really cracked down on public nudity and vulgarity now at the Pride Parades. Too bad aCW is such an idiot he doesn't realize I was always on his side about this stuff. lain:
Without better context aCW we still have no idea what the real story here was, probably nothing to do with the guy still clearly wearing flesh coloured trunks, despite your attempts at recycling phoney, misleading or faked pictures. :loser:I guess those kids haven't been to enough gay pride parades ey Al?
(Based on the look on the little boy's face, he must be a homophobic bigot).
OK, I can see the cropping. I just meant that when you run it through the software, the little boy was not photo-shopped into the picture. He was really there. Maybe he was reacting to a bulge? :think:I don't think it probably was photoshopped either but take another look:
Without better context aCW we still have no idea what the real story here was, probably nothing to do with the guy still clearly wearing flesh coloured trunks, despite your attempts at recycling phoney, misleading or faked pictures. :loser:
==================================================
Now take a look at an earlier version of this picture:
Notice the now rather more visible VPN (visible panty line), it's been cropped.
Or he may have just dropped his ice-cream?OK, I can see the cropping. I just meant that when you run it through the software, the little boy was not photo-shopped into the picture. He was really there. Maybe he was reacting to a bulge? :think:
what Jesus taught:
"go and sin no more"
what traci hears:
"go and sin all you like"
:nono:
Possible, but given the proximity to that slob.... :think: And you know, the pictures which LaBarbera used to show from San Francisco (they've since cracked down) were truly appalling. Truly. :nono:Or he may have just dropped his ice-cream?
As I said public nudity is already against the law.Possible, but given the proximity to that slob.... :think: And you know, the pictures which LaBarbera used to show from San Francisco (they've since cracked down) were truly appalling. Truly. :nono:
True: it is now- or is being enforced now. Yes.As I said public nudity is already against the law.
Public nudity is already against the law aCW, how soon you forget.
No comments on Paul Cameron