He is extremely intelligent, so he's not going to be liked by masses of people.....
His *intelligence* is not why he will not be liked ...
He is extremely intelligent, so he's not going to be liked by masses of people.....
Well, I am mainly interested in his stance on same sex marriage.......His *intelligence* is not why he will not be liked ...
aCw is not even himself anymore, just a big Ted Cruz now :AMR1: So why should his judgments matter? :think:
In any case, this man who runs the The Patriarchy site on Facebook makes a great deal of sense in his distinctions:
Only in the area of marriage, and I don't think he is hating nor lying.This guy claims he doesn't care if anyone is gay but spends an a awful lot of time lying about gays and promoting hate and discrimination.
I would like to say aCultureWarrior wants to be a modern Joseph McCarthy judging by his new avatar. It befits him well.
Hey, aCW: I had an idea:
Could you take your old avatar, and put it next to the Cruz one, and make it one picture?
Could you do that? Please?
Work with me here .......... :think:
Well, what was the name of the painting of your original? :think:
no can do. Ted Cruz is probably the only social conservative that will make a bid for the Republican Party Presidential nomination and his name and face need to be heard and seen.
Well, what was the name of the painting of your original? :think:
I cannot seem to find it....thnx
What a horrible thing to say to me; I'll never speak to you again."Get a life loser".
Well, I am mainly interested in his stance on same sex marriage.......
In any case, this man who runs the The Patriarchy site on Facebook makes a great deal of sense in his distinctions:
It's important to remember that precision in language matters. When I say I'm against homosexual "marriage" I'm not against homosexuals as a default.
I'm against organised deviancy. If you're just someone who can't get into the opposite sex, for whatever ultimate reason, I don't care. It's your issue, not mine.
But if you are advocating for the following, it is my issue:
Gay "marriage".
Gay adoption.
Gay identity/tribalism
Gay lifestyle advocacy aimed at children.
Again, if you're (for instance) a White male American whose sexual orientation is gay, then I don't care. Homosexuals have always been around.
What has NOT always been the case is the cultivation of a uniquely homosexual tribal identity which supercedes national, racial, religious and cultural boundaries.
So if you're a "gay man" as your primary identity, you want to marry another gay man in a church where the priest MUST comply or go to jail, and then you'll go on to adopt children and encourage them to explore homosexuality, you and I have massive issues.
Marriage is the traditional, sacred union of a man and a woman for the purpose of having and raising children.
If homosexuals want, they can have government-recognised civil unions with all the same benefits under the law (in most western nations).
Children who are raised by homosexual parents have increased instances of mental instability and enjoy lower qualities of life. They require a mother and a father. Their needs come before the selfish desires of homosexual parents.
This is a traditionalist page. While hating on gays just for being gay is not traditional, marriage and families ARE. They were designed by our Creator and are not subject to the whims of modernist society.
Nope, his association with patriarchy pretty much determines his lack of character.
Ummmm, you don't suppose that page was created by a certain TOL'er do you Sandy?
Only in the area of marriage, and I don't think he is hating nor lying.
What has NOT always been the case is the cultivation of a uniquely homosexual tribal identity which supercedes national, racial, religious and cultural boundaries.
A blatant lie. No priest/minister is required to marry anybody. Recently a minister in Alabama (Mississippi?)refused to marry an interracial couple which is entirely his right to do soyou want to marry another gay man in a church where the priest MUST comply or go to jail,
Except here the ability or the intent to have and raise children is not and has never been a criteria for marriage.Marriage is the traditional, sacred union of a man and a woman for the purpose of having and raising children.
They can sit at the back of the bus.If homosexuals want, they can have government-recognised civil unions with all the same benefits under the law (in most western nations).
Not supported by any legitimate research. In fact the research shows the opposite.Children who are raised by homosexual parents have increased instances of mental instability and enjoy lower qualities of life.
False. Children require loving attentive parents.They require a mother and a father.
THAT is entirely possible ...
I do, however, think it shows a specific agenda and particular mindset that doesn't really jive with the intention of this thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Ummmm, you don't suppose that page was created by a certain TOL'er do you Sandy?
I'll take it a step further and say "highly likely".
You have to keep in mind Sandy that GFR7 is a professional con artist who takes great pride in deceiving people into believing that he's not a threat to traditional values, all the while making it well known that he's not a threat to those who want to do their own "thing" when it comes to engaging in an inherently immoral and disease ridden behavior.
GFR7, like the mainstream LGBTQueer movement that this thread focuses on, wants to give those who engage in a sexually deviant behavior legislative rights, such as civil unions and protection against housing and employment discrimination (thus taking away the rights of the owner of the rental property or business to deny housing or employment to those who engage in a sexually deviant behavior); so you can see, there isn't a huge difference between the LGBTQueer movement and GFR7.
GFR7 uses children and the institution of marriage to push his con game, knowing that it'll touch the hearts of people who don't know how con artists like GFR7 work.
Oh and Sandy, if you're in the market for a Rolex watch, don't buy it from GFR7, buy retail.
OMGGGGGGGGGGG - YOU, YOU, YOU need help. OMGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG