GFR7
New member
Right. But he is old enough to choose better than he has.The 15 year old is a *child* ... and thereby off limits for all adults.
Right. But he is old enough to choose better than he has.The 15 year old is a *child* ... and thereby off limits for all adults.
Right. But he is old enough to choose better than he has.
And we know if he commits murder, the US will try him as an adult - so much for being a "child".
The whole story is sordid.
And I don't like being called a moral degenerate.
I think 15 is old enough to choose not to be a prostitute, don't you?
Would this 15 year old be held responsible if he fired a gun?You are way off. You wish to have children treated as adults only when you find it beneficial.
Can he legally drink? Purchase cigarettes? Marry? Go into the military? Drive?
Adults are considered negligent when they contribute to the delinquency of a minor in participating with any of the above. Why do you believe sex sets a different standard?
The shoe does not fit. And I'll bet you would be the first to want him tried as an adult if he committed murder. And to hold him responsible if he were dealing drugs, or molesting a younger child. Hypocrite. :AMR1:It's a typical story: homosexual predator molests young boy. The people following this thread have seen it time and time again.
The shoe fits.
At 15, the kid is still salvagable. Who knows what living hell he went through that lead him to the lifestyle that he was living.
Get him therapy/spiritual guidance and hope for the best in this totally messed up society that we live in.
The shoe does not fit. And I'll bet you would be the first to want him tried as an adult if he committed murder. And to hold him responsible if he were dealing drugs, or molesting a younger child. Hypocrite. :AMR1:
Would this 15 year old be held responsible if he fired a gun? Dealt drugs? Molested a 10 year old?
One is either an adult or a child. The law has no right to say, "If you engage in sex, you are a child and not responsible. If you kill someone, you are an adult and fully responsible." Legal scholars have agreed with me.There is a big difference between violent criminal activity as compared to making bad decisions.
One is either an adult or a child. The law has no right to say, "If you engage in sex, you are a child and not responsible. If you kill someone, you are an adult and fully responsible." Legal scholars have agreed with me.
The US is way off base here.
I NEVER said that an adult has a right to have sex with a minor. You are very much like aCW: Just put words in people's mouths, and make up whatever you want to about them. Brilliant.So draw a line. Six. Ten. Twelve. Fourteen? Also, no one said children/teens bear NO responsibility. It's a matter of who is the adult and who is the child.
Quit making excuses for adults to act horribly.
I NEVER said that an adult has a right to have sex with a minor. You are very much like aCW: Just put words in people's mouths, and make up whatever you want to about them. Brilliant.
Oh, I think many people would be against the DP for this. That doesn't mean they think it's not a criminal act, or one that shouldn't be taken seriously. You can't bully me into swallowing all your beliefs. Another similarity you have with aCW: "I am morality, and you are not morality." Hubris.Perhaps instead of looking up and posting articles on homosexuality, feminism and those that attack rape victims and teens, you should take a course in communications.
I think that anyone who violates a child should receive the DP REGARDLESS of their gender or sexual orientation. Why don't you?
Oh, I think many people would be against the DP for this.
Whatever you say, General. :salute:Against the DP for rape and child molestation? Well :duh: Those same people are against the DP for murder.
That only means that they view predators as deserving to breath the same air as their victims.
Rusha supports some radical feminist ideology;I want the followers of this 3 part thread to know how much it hurts me to see two B. Hussein Obama supporters going at each other.
That being said: In the name of TOL solidarity, I think that the king of goodwill should come forward and share his wisdom:
![]()
'Uh Johnny, what was it I was supposed to say? Oh yeah.
Why cant'z we all jist get along?'
Rusha supports some radical feminist ideology;
she supports gay marriage, and no fault divorce.
I do not.
I also do not support the Obama Administration.
Ha, that's rich, coming from you. Wow.Uh huh.
While Sandy (Rusha) and I agree on very little, I would safely say that she would agree with me when I say that you're (like so many homosexual males are) a misogynist.