beloved57
Well-known member
riveting response
There you have it. Do you want to discuss the points I made with scripture ?
riveting response
There you have it. Do you want to discuss the points I made with scripture ?
If you don't know just forget about it. I mean the Op and the other post I made that follows had stated all the points I have made. I don't have time for your foolishness!which points specifically?
The original word evangel/evangelism did not mean "good news". Gospel and good news are both English lies that have caused a great deal of confusion. The word gospel does not convey the original meaning.
I think that the word "Gospel" conveys the meaning perfectly. In the Greek it means "A good message" what better message is there than the Gospel?
Paul said, "The Gospel is the power of God unto salvation to everyone that believes" Romans 1:16. Maybe you don't believe the Gospel.
You haven't experienced the power of the evangelism. It's not a matter of opinion, it's a matter of fact. The original term does not translate or transliterate as Gospel, but it does transliterate as evangelism. There was not another language anywhere in the entire world that supplied the equivalent word. So other European translators transliterated.
What makes you think that I have not experienced the power of evangelism?
The Greek word "Gospel". Strongs Concordance, word #G2097, means Good News or Glad tidings.
There is no love of the truth in you and I wouldn't call you brother.
You two are half siblings. You both fight over who obeys God the least.
That would make you the runt of the litter.
There is no love of the truth in you and I wouldn't call you brother.
Universal Salvation is condemned also by Rom 5:10, because those Christ didn't die for are already condemned Jn 3:18, and they shall not see life in the future Jn 3:36. So the Universalist has a insurmountable hurdle with the fact that some men are under Gods Wrath and Condemned already, which can't be the case with people Christ died for.
Sent from my 5054N using TheologyOnline mobile app
Question for you: under Calvinism, when do the elect believe?
If they are not born believing, doesn't John 3:18 tell you that the elect are condemned up until the point that they believe?
Elect sinners believe at different times, but when they are unbelievers hating God, even when they are being His enemies, they are still reconciled to God by Christ death for them Rom 5:10 So even when they are in enmity against God and opposing Him, they are not condemned, but reconciled to God by Christ death. So Jn 3:18 can't apply to the Elect Christ died for. That's why universalism is condemned and heresy.
If you did refer to me as your brother, I would be very concerned.
That is a doctrine from Hell.
That scripture does not mean what you think it means.
Listen carefully, if God was saving you without your wanting, then what does it matter how gentle I speak to you? The scripture is about someone preaching the truth to you gently so that you do not get defensive and then not repent to God.
2 Timothy 2:25 In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth;
Are you saying gospel doesn't mean "good news" or "favorable tidings"?
What do you say it means?
Its meaning is irrelevant. Its an ancient English word. The English were not given the revelation and so there was no comparative word in the English language.
I reckon testimony is a closer meaning.