Why Do people On The Far Right Repeatedly Complain About Censorship...

[Arthur Brain]

When they advocate things that would effectively silence any dissenting voice to the point of them being executed for indulging in practices or beliefs that wouldn't align with their perceived 'status quo'? The Following archive thread being a case in point:

http://theologyonline.com/poll.php?pollid=598&do=showresults

This isn't so much about that thread itself but it does serve as a reminder that for every time a far right poster goes on about how 'conservatives' are being censored in the media, including social media outlets such as 'Youtube' & 'facebook' - these very same people would deprive others of even having a life in order to voice a contrary opinion if their personal or 'religious' ideal happened to be in place.

 

[ok doser]

disallowing a perversion like homosexuality is no more censorship than disallowing a perversion like pedophilia

 

[Arthur Brain]

disallowing a perversion like homosexuality is no more censorship than disallowing a perversion like pedophilia

You're free to believe that homosexuality is a perversion and that homosexuals should be executed as you did on the very thread above - albeit under one of your myriad usernames at the time. See, nobody is censoring you for that.



As you're now aware, human rights aren't at the whim of religious zealots and all the above is covered in the human rights act itself.

Try again.

Or, seeing as you would rather I wasn't actually here, then feel free to ignore me instead.

 

[ok doser]

You're free to believe that homosexuality is a perversion...

you'd have to be a retard to think otherwise

heterosexuality is normal

homosexuality is a perversion of normal


if you can't get that in your fool head, there's no point in going further

 

[Arthur Brain]

you'd have to be a retard to think otherwise

heterosexuality is normal

homosexuality is a perversion of normal


if you can't get that in your fool head, there's no point in going further

Normal for me, sure. Normal for you, maybe, although you're the one who bizarrely argues that straight people can "choose" to be attracted to the same gender which is just absurd.

Still, you're one of the people who voted that homosexuals should be executed so that's not only an infringement of human rights, it's also an extreme act of censorship as well.

 

[ok doser]

Normal for me, sure.

normal for all sexual creatures


looks like your knowledge of biology is as poor as that of history

 

[ok doser]

normal: not killing people
perversion of normal: killing people

prosecuting murderers and punishing them is not censorship

 

[ok doser]

normal: not stealing
perversion of normal: stealing

prosecuting thieves and punishing them is not censorship

 

[Arthur Brain]

normal for all sexual creatures


looks like your knowledge of biology is as poor as that of history

Um, plenty of evidence for homo or bisexuality taking place in nature dude. You seem about as clued up on biology as you are the human rights act....

In any event, even if your moral or religious sensibilities are offended by the notion of non heterosexual relations then you're not in a position to moan or complain about censorship when that very act affords you to air those views while protecting those you'd see killed...

So why do people like you vent about being censored exactly?

:think:

 

[Arthur Brain]

normal: not killing people
perversion of normal: killing people

prosecuting murderers and punishing them is not censorship

normal: not stealing
perversion of normal: stealing

prosecuting thieves and punishing them is not censorship

All covered by that...

Yeah, you guessed it:

The Human Rights Act.

 

[ok doser]

All covered by...

God's Law

 

[Arthur Brain]

God's Law

Zealous notions of religious law don't enter into laws that protect human rights dude. Most Christians don't support the execution of homosexuals by way of so try again, or you could always address the topic as to why zealots like yourself often go on about being censored while you'd pretty much be the biggest censors going if you had your "theocratic" way...

 

[ok doser]

Zealous notions of religious law don't enter into laws that protect human rights...

if God's Law does not overarch man's law, then man's law is useless

 

[Arthur Brain]

if God's Law does not overarch man's law, then man's law is useless

Well, again, you only underscore the need for laws that aren't ordained by religious zealots. Some folk, like yourself, think that homosexuals should be executed and the only way that could come about is through a minority view and puritanical system of government that would ride roughshod over people's basic human rights and censor any opposing view 'in the name of God'.

 

[ok doser]

Well, again, you only underscore the need for ....

God's Law to have primacy in our legislatures

 

[Arthur Brain]

God's Law to have primacy in our legislatures

You don't get to decide what that is dude. Most Christians don't support capital punishment for homosexuals. Even your good bud Billybob at the time you were 'Koban' sliced through that and to how any such laws were unconstitutional. You're only arguing more and more in favour of censorship despite the far right feebly tring to maintain it's borne of liberal ideology...

Do carry on!

 

[quip]

disallowing a perversion like homosexuality is no more censorship than disallowing a perversion like pedophilia

It is....especially in lieu of a rational and practical reason otherwise.

 

[MrDante]

When they advocate things that would effectively silence any dissenting voice to the point of them being executed for indulging in practices or beliefs that wouldn't align with their perceived 'status quo'? The Following archive thread being a case in point:

http://theologyonline.com/poll.php?pollid=598&do=showresults

This isn't so much about that thread itself but it does serve as a reminder that for every time a far right poster goes on about how 'conservatives' are being censored in the media, including social media outlets such as 'Youtube' & 'facebook' - these very same people would deprive others of even having a life in order to voice a contrary opinion if their personal or 'religious' ideal happened to be in place.

This is part of the "it's not wrong when I do it" mind-set

 

[ok doser]

You don't get to decide what that is dude.

as it turns out artie, i do, through our elective process and legislative system

in fact, i get to decide (or rather, I get to influence that decision) and you don't :wave2:

It is....especially in lieu of a rational and practical reason otherwise.

homosexuality is detrimental to society, as has been shown

 

[Nick M]

The censorship is things like media blocking information showing that there is no man made global warming.