ECT What makes Preterism so impossible
- Thread starter Totton Linnet
- Start date
This:
You accused us, sweetie, of following "fallable men" teachings. Show us the infallible men, on planet earth, that teach you, that we may follow them, so as not to be pegged as following "fallable men."
What's the problem, sweetie? In denial?
Little more than that. :juggle:
More in denial, from the little arms Craigie Berstein:
You accused us, sweetie, of following "fallable men" teachings. Show us the infallible men, on planet earth, that teach you, that we may follow them, so as not to be pegged as following "fallable men."
What's the problem, sweetie? In denial?
More in denial, from the little arms Craigie Berstein:
You accused us, sweetie, of following "fallable men" teachings. Show us the infallible men, on planet earth, that teach you, that we may follow them, so as not to be pegged as following "fallable men."
What's the problem, sweetie? In denial?
Craigie Bernstein suffers another fatal death knell!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You accused us, sweetie, of following "fallable men" teachings. Show us the infallible men, on planet earth, that teach you, that we may follow them, so as not to be pegged as following "fallable men."
What's the problem, sweetie? In denial?
Craigie Bernstein suffers another fatal death knell!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Prove it.
And quote infallible men, in your "response."
What's the problem, chinless one?;
Nope.
MAD is false because it can't stand the test of scripture.
I claim MADists/Dispensationalists live in denial when they don't acknowledge that John Nelson Darby invented Dispensationalism in 1830, and that Dispensationalism didn't exist before Darby.
It has nothing to do with fallible or infallible men, considering Christ Jesus was the only infallible man to ever live.
Redemption of the body, you vile satanist, which, by definition, is the physical body, albeit not controlled by the "lusts of the flesh," as we will have the spirit of God within us, saved from the presence of sin-our glorification. Of course, since you have such a twitty looking "body," you'd be clueless on this subject, demon.
Caught again-lied, again....
The habitual liar of TOL, little arms Craigier Bernstein, again is caught in another continuing lie.
Craigie Wimpy Tellalie, besides his "Darby" stumper, which he spams on every thread, as one of his "arguments" against the dispensational approach in interpreting the book, also asserts that dispensationalism is false, because it is taught by "fallible men," i.e., he claims that his "AD 70-ism," Preterism, was taught to him by infallible men. To wit:
"Yes Mr. Whalen, they were fallible men who invented dispensationalism just over 150 years ago. Mr. Whalen, you might want to ask yourself why you follow the teachings of these fallible men?"-Craigie Tet.
"A secret parenthetical time period is a false theory made up by fallible men.”-Preterist con "man" Craigie
"MAD is a false non-Biblical belief system that was made up by fallable men."-Preterist Craigee the Wimp
Just show us, Craigie, the infallible men that we should follow, since we do not want to follow "fallable men," unlike your belief system, which you "argue," in contrast, is not false, since infallible men taught it to you.
Do be a dear, Craigie-just identify, sweetie, these infallible men on earth, that we may follow, so that you cannot accuse us of following "fallable men." Craigie:
As silent as a turkey farm, on the third Thursday, of November.
You sniveling, little chinned weasel, engager in sophistry, the habitual liar, of TOL.
______________________
" Mr. Whalen, you might want to ask yourself why you follow the teachings of these fallible men."-Tellalie
Just show me the teachings of infallible men, on earth, sweetie, so that I may follow them.
Come on, punk-identify them.
You lie more than you cry, you demonic loser, pathetivc troll, here, and slumped in your little room at home.
ClimateSanity
New member
Then quit using the phrase to discredit MAD if you have an ounce of honesty.
Here is what you claimed, you habitual liar:
" That's not my argument.
I have never said that dispensationalism was wrong because of how old it was. I specifically said that no one taught about Christ coming back twice before Darby did."-Craigie Berstein.
Lying punk-all of TOL knows it.
Moron; the Preterist sine quo non is there.
Who said anything about that passage being a reference to 70AD, you imbecile.
You constantly read your idiot stupidity into the words of others.
And yet, you actually believe yourself a credible interpreter.
But most on here know you have no real interest in these things other than what strife you might set off by your baiting questions.
Vs.
"Yes Mr. Whalen, they were fallible men who invented dispensationalism just over 150 years ago. Mr. Whalen, you might want to ask yourself why you follow the teachings of these fallible men?"-Craigie Tet.
"A secret parenthetical time period is a false theory made up by fallible men.”-Preterist con "man" Craigie
"MAD is a false non-Biblical belief system that was made up by fallable men."-Preterist Craigee the Wimp
you might want to ask yourself why you follow the teachings of these fallible men?-Craigie
You follow infallible men, unlike us, do you sweetie?
ClimateSanity
New member
He better NEVER use that phrase again.
I can't dumb myself down to your level in order to make you understand my point.
Dispensationalism was invented by John Nelson Darby in 1830. Dispensationalism didn't exist before Darby. Darby was a fallible man.
Preterism cannot be traced to one man.
If you can trace Preterism to one man, and show that one man invented it, and that it didn't exist before that one man, then you would have an argument against me.
However, after many years, neither you, nor anyone else has been able to trace Preterism to one man.
Therefore, Preterism wasn't invented by a fallible man like Dispensationalism was.
Last edited:
Dispensationalism was invented by a fallible man. His name was John Nelson Darby, and he invented Dispensationalism in 1830.
Dispensationalism didn't exist before Darby.
Until you acknowledge these facts, you prove that you live in denial.
It's "Sine qua non", not "sine quo non".
If you're going to try and pretend to be smart by throwing around some Latin, at least try and spell it correctly.
ClimateSanity
New member
Throw out the deceitful word FALLIBLE and then we can discuss your obsession.
Fine with me.
Dispensationalism was invented by John Nelson Darby in 1830. Dispensationalism didn't exist before Darby invented it.
Dispensationalism is a false doctrine invented by a man.