I can't make an argument because you're unable to follow it?You cannot debate people in such a way. Your presumptions are from your imagination and ruin the discussion. Stick to exactly what is said and not what your imagination would like you to hear.
Is that really what you meant to suggest?
In response to the wrong point!I am giving scriptures.
What you say is NOWHERE in the Bible. It is from the imagination of men.
I quoted the scripture references, ding bat!
Which point didn't happen?
1. Jesus hand picked the Twelve apostles, none of which were Saul from Tarsus - could have been - but wasn't.
2. The resurrected Jesus gives the remaining eleven Apostles the Great Commission. Still no Saul of Tarsus around, anywhere.
3. The resurrected and ascended Jesus sends the Holy Spirit to all twelve of the Apostles including Matthias. - again - no Saul of Tarsus!
4. Saul is converted and becomes Paul after the Sanhedrin reject Stephen's "irresistible wisdom" and stone him - probably with Saul's direct oversight if not direct participation.
5. The Twelve DO NOT obey the Great Commission, instead electing to stay in Israel and minister to "the circumcision".
6. Paul is sent to preach to the whole world a message that YOU CLAIM IS THE EXACT SAME GOSPEL MESSAGE AS THE TWELVE but which he calls "my gospel" and which he claims to have received by revelation directly from Jesus.
Which of those six things didn't happen? Which of them am I imagining?
I'll tell you this. I'd better be imagining them or else your doctrine is in big trouble! What sort of doctrinal system can't account for something as obviously critical to the Christian faith as Paul's existence as an Apostle and the refusal of the Twelve to obey the Great Commission?
Resting in Him,
Clete