jsanford108
New member
First off, if you are going to copy and paste everything from Wikipedia, just give a brief summary instead,
with the appropriate links.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandrian_school#History
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Alexander_I_of_Alexandria
Yes, but this is very different from the Catechetical School of Alexandria. Do not try and conflate the two into the same thing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catechetical_School_of_Alexandria
This is the end of your paste from Wiki, on this portion. What follows is your own false conclusions.
This is completely false. Here is a wiki link, since that seems to be your preference, on Gnosticism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnosticism
Notice how in no way does the Trinity even fit into Gnosticism, due to the fact that Gnostics deny the Trinity and the hypostatic nature/union of Christ.
And false again. The Kabbalists did not even appear until the 12th century. So, there is no way that Jesus was talking about their ideas in Mark's Gospel.
Now, you could argue that the Jews who believed in the Trinity, as described by Jesus, were "Kabbalists," but that just makes them "Christians" or even "Messianic Jews" (these are Jews who believe in Christ, yet still practice the Mosaic Laws of Judaism).
You realize this contradicts your ideas you stated just before this, on Kabbalist letters?
Come on man, just summarize and provide a link.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valentinus_(Gnostic)
You also, never said where your original biblical text is from? Just a date of composition, transcription, etc. Even a version attribution would suffice.
"I'Am" is not in Greek or Hebrew, it is strictly a English phrase. The correct translation is "The Living." "I'Am" is something that has been cultivated by Gnostics.
If you wouldn't mind answering my inquiry on what original biblical text you have, it would be a great revelation to us all.
I also provided my last response, since you seemed to just look over it. Probably because it was devastating to your claims.