wholearmor said:
No, and I didn't mean to make it sould like I was accusing all Christians of condoning dishonesty. If it sounded like I was, then I apologize for the confusion.
All I know is, I was once where you are now...very mixed up and confused about the meaning of life and its purpose. I'm not now. I feel happy for me and sorry for you.
With all due respect, Wholearmor ... I'm not "mixed up," nor "confused." But making a statement like that is rather like trying to answer the question "So, Justin, have you stopped beating your wife yet?" If I sound confused, many Christians take that as "proof" that they're right and I'm wrong ... yet if I deny that I'm confused, I'm "deceiving myself," or I'm "deceived by Satan," or ... whatever.
Human beings, generally speaking, are capable of accurate knowledge, honest self-analysis, and discernment ... yet because your Bible says what it says, you are forced to conclude that non-Christians are only capable of two at most.
Brothers? Who's carrying out all the terrorist attacks around the world, Muslims or Christians?
Look to the history of Christendom, Wholearmor. Show me any sin that self-prolaimed Muslims have committed that have never been committed by self-proclaimed Christians. Oh, to be sure, I don't think I've ever met a Christian suicide bomber, but we're both familiar with the battle cry of "Kill them all: God will know his own!" (
Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoset.)
"
Allahu Akbar" and "
Deus Volent" have both been used to excuse a multitude of sins, Wholearmor. Now, to be sure, there is a much greater prevalence of Muslim terrorism in the world ... or, at least, in the press. The Muslims have Usama bin Laden ... the Christians have Eric Rudolph. And the only difference between the two is the success rate.
Now, before you ask, no, I do not consider Rudolf to be a "real" Christian ... whatever that is. By the same token, I do not consider bin Laden to be a "real" Muslim.
Wholearmor, I tell you this: the Bible of the Christians is just as fallable as the Qur'an of the Muslims. Both books bear the stigma of human error, human prejudice, and human desires ... and yes, both bear the marks of human wisdom. Neither book is perfect, but both strive to show man's understanding of God. In the end, both are fundamentally futile ... but such wisdom as can be gained from them is due, in part, to the fleeting, ephemeral, and all too human frailties of these books.
I am not as knowledgeable in the Quran as others, so I would decline the opportunity to deconstruct it, but as for the Bible being the work of man, not of God, I've already contacted Knight regarding a possible Battle Royal over the historicity of the Bible. If such a plan is approved, I welcome your participation.