Vaccine researcher admits spike protein is a dangerous toxin

[Gary K]

H

Ok, let's talk about Dr. Fisman and his connections to vaccines. Yes, he works for a university that was home to a vaccine company.

You are trying to take advantage of the fact that readers will not think this through. But I will. If you are going to be an expert on vaccines, you are almost certainly going to be affiliated with a hospital and / or other academic institution that works to promote public health. And since vaccines are central to promoting public health, there will, again, almost certainly be a connection to vaccine manufacturing.

In short, it is highly unrealistic to expect that a vaccine expert will not have at least some connection, however tenuous and indirect, to a vaccine company. You are either hiding this fact from the reader, or you did not realize it.

Your argument here is like expecting an expert of aircraft safety system to have no connection at all to the industry that manufactures such systems - this is asking the impossible.

And what of the redoubtable Dr. Bridle when it comes to conflicts of interest? As we shall see in future posts, I can play the same card you have played.

Well, here you go. Here's a real negative on Bridle. He is actually a supporter of vaccines. He runs a program that creates vaccines. He openly comes out and says what his possible conflicts of interest are.

So, this guy is an insider in the vaccine industry. In spite of that he is saying what he found and how dangerous it is. That's putting his career, his income, and possibly his life on the line when he reveals what's going on. That's called, for your information, personal integrity. Honesty. Love for his fellow man. It's a highly altruistic move. It's putting other people before himself. I will take the word of a man like that any day.

"I would probably prefer to have natural immunity" — Viral Immunologist

Dr Byram Bridle (Viral Immunologist) shares his preference for naturally acquired immunity, instead of "narrow" immunity conferred by the vaccine.

dryburgh.com

 

[expos4ever]

Here is more on Fisman's lack of integrity.

https://canucklaw.ca/meet-david-fisman-ost-etfo-gaslighting-when-a-side-hustle-goes-horribly-wrong/

Who's Behind The Ontario Science Table? A Look At Their Partners And Members - Canuck Law

For some background on the University of Toronto, Ontario Science Table, check this earlier article. While it’s true that there the vast majority of these members (and many Medical Health Officers in Ontario) have ties to U of T, there’s more to it than that. Let’s take a look: It’s important...

canucklaw.ca

Here's a link to Fisman's declaration of integrity. He admits being a paid consultant for Phizer and AZ.

https://covid19-sciencetable.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Declaration-of-Interest_Science-Table_David-Fisman.pdf

You really want to stand by canuck law? Did you not think I would investigate what these people stand for and endorse?

I suggest you consider withdrawing your use of a link to canuck law.

Or an embarrassing cavalcade of revelations about this site will be forthcoming.

 

[expos4ever]

Are you incapable of doing any research on your own? What does it matter which doctors. You'd reject them out of hand anyway so I see no need to waste my time.

Nice try. Your words, your responsibility to back up those words.

I am literally salivating in anticipation of who these mysterious - and heretofore unnamed - "doctors" will turn out to be.

So, again, who are these doctors who support the findings of Dr. Bridle?

 

[expos4ever]

Can you name one peer-reviewed publications (or data, or pre-prints) which support Bridle's claims?

 

[Gary K]

You really want to stand by canuck law? Did you not think I would investigate what these people stand for and endorse?

I suggest you consider withdrawing your use of a link to canuck law.

Or an embarrassing cavalcade of revelations about this site will be forthcoming.

Ooh. I'm scared. Why should I withdraw a link? Because the site is conservative? You don't like it, of course. So what? I don't care if you like it or not.

If you had something to say you would have said it. Instead you opt for the other socialist option. You try bullying.

 

[Gary K]

Nice try. Your words, your responsibility to back up those words.

I am literally salivating in anticipation of who these mysterious - and heretofore unnamed - "doctors" will turn out to be.

So, again, who are these doctors who support the findings of Dr. Bridle?

Go find them. Do your own research. I have no responsibility to you. In fact, I could care less about your opinion. You've already proven how little integrity you have.

I think it's hilarious that you can't find a researcher/doctor who opposes the mrna vaccines.

 

[Gary K]

Here's something you'll really like, exposed. The most published doctor in the world on the coronavirus has a lot to say. And, btw, he backs up Dr. Bridle all the way. He also tears apart the problems with the vaccine and how dangerous they are.

He says he is actually distraught over what is going on because of the dangers it presents.

PRO-VAX DOC: “I CAN NO LONGER RECOMMEND THE VACCINE TO ANY INDIVIDUAL”

PRO-VAX DOC: “I CAN NO LONGER RECOMMEND THE VACCINE TO ANY INDIVIDUAL” Jim Meehan, MD, has a candid “doctor to doctor” discussion with Professor of Medicine, Peter McCullough, MD, about why he changed his mind on recommending the Covid vaccine to…

www.bitchute.com

 

[chair]

It turns out that even cardiologists can be wrong.

 

[expos4ever]

Ooh. I'm scared. Why should I withdraw a link? Because the site is conservative? You don't like it, of course. So what? I don't care if you like it or not.

If you had something to say you would have said it. Instead you opt for the other socialist option. You try bullying.

Oh, I assure you I have plenty to say about "canucklaw"; I just thought it would be polite to let you withdraw the post to avoid embarrassment.

But, it appears you have elected to do it the hard way.

So, let us begin. For starters, red flag number 1: The author of the article critiquing Dr. Fisman is identified only as "Ronnie". Hmmm, that's interesting - why no last name? I suggest we all know the answer. If Dr. Fauci ever writes a paper and identifies himself as "Tony", then we can talk.

Next post, we'll see what this site has to say about zionism. And, yes, this is on-topic since it speaks directly to the credibility of this source.

 

[expos4ever]

Ooh. I'm scared. Why should I withdraw a link? Because the site is conservative? You don't like it, of course. So what? I don't care if you like it or not.

If you had something to say you would have said it. Instead you opt for the other socialist option. You try bullying.

Red Flag Number 2 about canucklaw - They have a link where they address Zionism. No doubt you will reply that there are indeed legitimate critiques that can be mounted against the policies of the state of Israel. And you would be 100% correct. But, let's delve into that link and see what kind of critiques are on offer:

Why can’t the Holocaust be questioned? Every other event in human history is allowed to be questioned, but not this apparently.

Are you still OK with canucklaw?

 

[expos4ever]

Here's something you'll really like, exposed. The most published doctor in the world on the coronavirus has a lot to say. And, btw, he backs up Dr. Bridle all the way. He also tears apart the problems with the vaccine and how dangerous they are.

He says he is actually distraught over what is going on because of the dangers it presents.

PRO-VAX DOC: “I CAN NO LONGER RECOMMEND THE VACCINE TO ANY INDIVIDUAL”

PRO-VAX DOC: “I CAN NO LONGER RECOMMEND THE VACCINE TO ANY INDIVIDUAL” Jim Meehan, MD, has a candid “doctor to doctor” discussion with Professor of Medicine, Peter McCullough, MD, about why he changed his mind on recommending the Covid vaccine to…

www.bitchute.com

Ah yes, the old "post-a-long-video-that-purport-to-endorse-your-position-and-expect-us-to-waste-30+ minutes-to-find-out-that-you-are -misleading-us" strategy. No thank, don't have time.

If you can tell us where (i.e. what point in the video) he says anything that remotely supports your opinion on this, then I will take a look.

But I can guarantee you that you will either:

(a) evade your obligation to do this - and it is indeed your obligation to tell us what specifically this guy is saying. It is simply not fair to post long links that likely do not support your position and force us to waste 30 minutes of our lives to prove this.

(b) find a statement from this guy that does not really support your position after all.

But here are reasons to be deeply suspicious of Dr. McCullough. From factcheck:

Healthy people younger than 50 do not need a Covid-19 vaccine: FALSE​

The CDC says on its website that risk of severe disease from the novel coronavirus increases with age, but National Center for Health Statistics data shows that people under age 50 account for four percent of deaths involving Covid-19.

And a March 26, 2021 article in Science also found that by mid-August 2020 “the resurgence in the United States was largely driven by adults 20 to 49 years of age.”

Olivier Schwartz, head of the Virus and Immunity Unit at the Pasteur Institute, told AFP by phone: “It is obvious that people under 50 who are in good health should be vaccinated” because they can still be affected by the disease.

Bruno Lina, professor of virology at the University of Lyon, said that the aim of a mass vaccination campaign is to reduce the transmission of a virus.

People who have recovered from Covid-19 do not need the vaccine: FALSE​

Around the 12-minute mark of his testimony, McCullough claims: “People who develop Covid have complete and durable immunity.”

He goes on to say, “You can’t beat natural immunity. You can’t vaccinate on top of it and make it better. There’s no scientific, clinical or safety rationale for ever vaccinating a Covid recovered patient.”

However, an article in the journal BMJ found reinfection is possible.

Lina said that “we have the feeling today that the vaccine induces better immunity than certain natural infections.”

He said that for people with less symptomatic bouts of Covid-19, “we observe a rapid loss of antibody titer, and therefore a potential for reinfection faster than that observed with vaccination.”

The Pasteur Institute’s Schwartz also confirmed that people who have contracted Covid-19 have an interest in being vaccinated “because the antibody level decreases in all people.”