Vaccination progress

marke

Well-known member
Basically, you are saying that every election in Michigan is fraudulent and fake.

It's really not worth my arguing this with you, but I'd like to introduce a concept embraced by the founding fathers of our country.

Do you know of the concept "consent of the ruled"?
As long as voter fraud goes unchecked then no election can be trusted to have been fair and accurate. Do you remember Landslide Lyndon? That was more than 70 years ago and democrats were committing voter fraud even before then. Here is an interesting article that exposes voter fraud and the fact that just a small number of fraudulent votes can swing a major election from a legitimate candidate to a crook:

Morton's minions failed to uncover much fraud in most states, but they hit pay dirt in Texas and Illinois.
In Texas, Kennedy's 46,000-vote margin was the closest statewide race there since 1948, when Kennedy's running mate, Lyndon B. Johnson, won a Senate seat by 87 votes (the origin of the nickname "Landslide Lyndon"). Morton's operatives, aided by local Republicans, uncovered plenty of political chicanery. For instance: In Fannin County, which had 4,895 registered voters, 6,138 votes were cast, three-quarters of them for Kennedy. In one precinct of Angelia County, 86 people voted and the final tally was 147 for Kennedy, 24 for Nixon.
On and on it went. The Republicans demanded a recount, claiming that it would give them 100,000 votes and victory. John Connally, the state Democratic chairman, said the Republicans were just "haggling for headlines" and predicted that a recount would give Kennedy another 50,000 votes.
But there was no recount. The Texas Election Board, composed entirely of Democrats, had already certified Kennedy as the winner.
 

Hilltrot

Well-known member
As long as voter fraud goes unchecked then no election can be trusted to have been fair and accurate. Do you remember Landslide Lyndon? That was more than 70 years ago and democrats were committing voter fraud even before then. Here is an interesting article that exposes voter fraud and the fact that just a small number of fraudulent votes can swing a major election from a legitimate candidate to a crook:

Morton's minions failed to uncover much fraud in most states, but they hit pay dirt in Texas and Illinois.
In Texas, Kennedy's 46,000-vote margin was the closest statewide race there since 1948, when Kennedy's running mate, Lyndon B. Johnson, won a Senate seat by 87 votes (the origin of the nickname "Landslide Lyndon"). Morton's operatives, aided by local Republicans, uncovered plenty of political chicanery. For instance: In Fannin County, which had 4,895 registered voters, 6,138 votes were cast, three-quarters of them for Kennedy. In one precinct of Angelia County, 86 people voted and the final tally was 147 for Kennedy, 24 for Nixon.
On and on it went. The Republicans demanded a recount, claiming that it would give them 100,000 votes and victory. John Connally, the state Democratic chairman, said the Republicans were just "haggling for headlines" and predicted that a recount would give Kennedy another 50,000 votes.
But there was no recount. The Texas Election Board, composed entirely of Democrats, had already certified Kennedy as the winner.
My explanation for "consent of the governed".

Generally speaking every government in the world is a democracy even if it goes by another name. In every case, the people in the country choose to be ruled by those in charge.

Take a simple example - North Korea. You might think that the people of North Korea could not have possibly consented to be ruled by Kim Jong-Un. But Kim Jong-Un is only human and a fat one at that. The generals choose to obey Kim Jong-Un, the soldiers choose to obey Kim Jong-Un. The peasants choose to continue to serve their masters and so on. You may consider it to be a stupid choice, an ill-informed choice, or a coerced choice, but it is a choice nonetheless. If the people of North Korea chose not to obey Kim Jong-Un, there would be nothing he could do about it.

In Michigan, I believe the people chose their Governor. I'm not saying there was no cheating at the election, but the other side gave up and decided that Gretchen Whitmer would be just fine. If they weren't ok with the results, they could have easily walked into the governor's office and thrown her out. Half the Snyder's voters, 900,000, would not be stopped by Whitmer. I guess the other side could gather half of their voters 1,100,000 and guess what you'd have then. A civil war. The people of Michigan decided that even though the election may not have been legitimate, it was legitimate enough.

When Whitmer decided to lockdown everything, the people could have all said no. The cops could have said no. The Judges could have said no. etc. The people decided whether they believed it was right or not that it was not too much to ask and that waiting till the next election was fine. But Whitmer may win her re-election! Although some people may not believe it on this forum but large numbers of people like to be told what to do.
 

marke

Well-known member
My explanation for "consent of the governed".

Generally speaking every government in the world is a democracy even if it goes by another name. In every case, the people in the country choose to be ruled by those in charge.

Take a simple example - North Korea. You might think that the people of North Korea could not have possibly consented to be ruled by Kim Jong-Un. But Kim Jong-Un is only human and a fat one at that. The generals choose to obey Kim Jong-Un, the soldiers choose to obey Kim Jong-Un. The peasants choose to continue to serve their masters and so on. You may consider it to be a stupid choice, an ill-informed choice, or a coerced choice, but it is a choice nonetheless. If the people of North Korea chose not to obey Kim Jong-Un, there would be nothing he could do about it.

In Michigan, I believe the people chose their Governor. I'm not saying there was no cheating at the election, but the other side gave up and decided that Gretchen Whitmer would be just fine. If they weren't ok with the results, they could have easily walked into the governor's office and thrown her out. Half the Snyder's voters, 900,000, would not be stopped by Whitmer. I guess the other side could gather half of their voters 1,100,000 and guess what you'd have then. A civil war. The people of Michigan decided that even though the election may not have been legitimate, it was legitimate enough.

When Whitmer decided to lockdown everything, the people could have all said no. The cops could have said no. The Judges could have said no. etc. The people decided whether they believed it was right or not that it was not too much to ask and that waiting till the next election was fine. But Whitmer may win her re-election! Although some people may not believe it on this forum but large numbers of people like to be told what to do.
Biden likely had millions of illegal votes to give him the presidency. That was not the will of the majority of American people, but the will of the devil and the democrat party.
 

Hilltrot

Well-known member
Biden stole the election with help from his demonic friends, but he will not benefit in the end because God will hold him accountable as well as all his demonic friends.
I agree that God will hold everyone accountable.
 

eider

Well-known member
You have repeatedly stated that "the virus was over months ago". You haven't once presented evidence that this is true.
Europe is going back in to lockdown. Doser showed how much worse covid has been in the USA since January. Brazil is in deep trouble, and Stripe doesn't care.
 
Top