TracerBullet
New member
Please post evidence of this claim.
It's only a few posts up. Pay attention to what you post why don't you?
There is no overwhelming evidence of homosexuality being biological and furthermore if they applied the same standards of scientific rigor and peer review to studies of homosexuality that they do "germ theory" NO ONE would dare make a claim that homosexuality COULD BE biological.
Again, COULD BE, MIGHT BE, POSSIBLY BE are the operative words for every homosexual study done to date and this is why they aren't real science.
Now:
DO you have any evidence that the same standards of scientific rigor and peer review are not applied to studies of homosexuality that they do "germ theory"???
DO you have any evidence that interest groups altered the results of the studies you don't like???
And the fact remains that you can't post one reputable scientific source that can prove that homosexuality is a choice or the result of how one was raised