1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
Not sure about that in this case.
That's why you were scratching your head. :think:
Not sure about that in this case.
I don't uderstand why people are lining up to defend Manafort and Gates. I am not gleeful but if these guys broke the law, then they are being rightfully prosecuted.
I'm just trying to figure what is so gleeful about here....
Viktor Yanukovych
...a Ukrainian politician who was elected as the fourth President of Ukraine on February 7, 2010. He served as President from February 2010 until his removal from power in February 2014 as a result of the 2014 Ukrainian revolution. He is currently in exile in Russia and wanted by Ukraine for high treason.
...Yanukovych rejected a pending EU association agreement, choosing instead to pursue a Russian loan bailout and closer ties with Russia.
...Viktor Yanukovych had been granted Russian citizenship by a "secret decree" of Vladimir Putin.
...in foreign affairs, Yanukovych's cabinet was considered to be politically close to Russia, although declaring support for Ukrainian membership in the European Union
...In 2005 the Party of Regions signed a collaboration agreement with the Russian political party United Russia
etc etc
Vindication. The election was subverted whether it ever came out or not. It's satisfying to see it proven, and it brings hope that democracy and freedom might triumph over kleptocracy after all.
It's a dim hope, but it's there.
Who's law? Ceaser's?
Vindication. The election was subverted whether it ever came out or not.
One persons word against another.
You get to confront them in court.
Unconstitutional intersection cameras only lasted long enough to be found just that.
Thru Facebook and Twitter......wow....some subversion.
Vindication? Your a hoot....you sit here on your high horse saying it can't be done to us....yet we do it all over the globe and not a peep out of you.
Well, I'd like it not to be done to anyone. Our laws are focused on it not being done to us, and of course we have a special interest in protecting our own elections from meddling. The best outcome, if it were up to me, is that we'd save our democracy and learn a new respect for the elections in other countries (Chile, Iran, ...).
Viktor Yanukovych
...a Ukrainian politician who was elected as the fourth President of Ukraine on February 7, 2010. He served as President from February 2010 until his removal from power in February 2014 as a result of the 2014 Ukrainian revolution. He is currently in exile in Russia and wanted by Ukraine for high treason.
...Yanukovych rejected a pending EU association agreement, choosing instead to pursue a Russian loan bailout and closer ties with Russia.
...Viktor Yanukovych had been granted Russian citizenship by a "secret decree" of Vladimir Putin.
...in foreign affairs, Yanukovych's cabinet was considered to be politically close to Russia, although declaring support for Ukrainian membership in the European Union
...In 2005 the Party of Regions signed a collaboration agreement with the Russian political party United Russia
etc etc
Ok, sure....but it's better to have a tape. Makes things a lot clearer for the court.
They haven't been found unconstitutional in general. And you haven't shown a Constitutional privilege against being recorded surreptitiously by law enforcement, as I requested. You don't have a right just because you assert it.
So, that would be like saying that a few of our Senators or Representatives constitutes the U.S. government.
Just aint so.
You said "they sure wouldn't have been lobbying for pro Russians."
They were
Okay so I didn't add government to that.
Wizard was already implying it as well as the indictments.
I know you're not a deep thinker but I shouldn't have to reiterate points already made with every post.:crackup:
Project away, little man.
Then remain silent/plead the fifth amendment.
You cannot knowingly make false statements. :duh:
Did you honestly not know that?