The last I'd heard, Tijuana was ticked off because they weren't getting through and Mexico was stuck having to put up with them.
Yep. NOW they are suing the group that talked them into the trek. I am not what group is helping them with that.
The last I'd heard, Tijuana was ticked off because they weren't getting through and Mexico was stuck having to put up with them.
He's refurbishing a wall to fuel your ridiculous, made up fears of something a wall can't do anything about_
How many rape or kill everyday, but you've chosen to be focused on these rare immigrants.
they quote some little bits and then paraphrase most of it - i'd prefer to see the original from DHS than the author's paraphrase
he does slip up here, when he paraphrases this: "to prevent tunneling under it to a depth of six feet"
that's very different than the DHS saying, as he implies, that a six foot depth will stop all tunnels
also, a bit disingenuous to bury in the text of the article the following: "the wall must have anti-climbing devices" after suggesting in a headline that "the DHS believes that a 30–foot tall wall cannot be scaled"
looks to me like DHS does indeed realize that a plain unadorned wall can be scaled
so, more strawmen from the brookings institute
it's a shame to see them stoop to this level - I used to respect their work
but then i used to respect the work done by those disgusting scumbags at the southern poverty law center
i would expect that a wall would stop most if not all of the cross border drug smuggling that currently occurs where there is no wall/fence/effective border security
Border Patrol agents on the front lines say they need more technology and additional personnel to curb the illegal traffic, according to a report released on Thursday by Democrats on the Senate Homeland Security Committee. The report was based on internal Customs and Border Protection documents from the 2017 fiscal year. It concluded that less than one half of 1 percent of the agents’ suggestions to secure the Southwest border mentioned the need for a wall. Congressional Democrats and some Republicans, including Representative Will Hurd of Texas, have questioned the need for a wall and instead called for more technology along the border, such as sensors and surveillance equipment. A February 2017 study by the Government Accountability Office found that Customs and Border Protection had not shown the extent to which fencing and walls have secured the border. The House on Thursday approved spending money on border fencing, but not a border wall. The bill would fund nearly $1.6 billion for border security, including technology and repairs to existing barriers. That includes $641 million for about 33 miles of new border fencing in the Rio Grande Valley. The president’s budget request for the 2019 fiscal year includes $43 million for remote video surveillance systems along the border and more funding for other security technology. It also includes $255 million to hire and retain agents at the Border Patrol, which has been shedding personnel faster than it can hire. Agency documents indicate the Border Patrol must recruit 133 applicants to fill a single agent’s position. Mr. Trump wants to hire 5,000 new agents. A program to detect drug tunnels beneath the southern border — another security priority cited by agents — was not funded in Mr. Trump’s budget request, the Democratic report noted. |
and i'm sure that DHS understands that drug smugglers won't just stop, they'll look for other ways to bring drugs cross-border, ways that aren't as easy as just walking or driving it across an open border
I don't read anything you post. Your track record of ignorance and stupidity is too far and wide for me to ever waste my time.
missed this one - re tunnels:
and what is the cost of a tunnel compared to a pickup traveling across a poorly monitored stretch of border?
answer: high
nobody thinks putting up a wall will stop the laws of supply and demand, but it will force smugglers to work harder and to use methods that are easier to combat
If the Trump administration follows through on the president's promises to build a border wall, would it actually stop undocumented immigrants and illegal drugs? Two former smugglers explain how they'd work around it. Since 2007, the number of undocumented immigrants who overstayed visas after first entering the country legally — across a bridge or port of entry — far outnumbered those who sneaked in, according to a 2017 report by the Center for Migration Studies. A wall would do nothing to stop them. Physical barriers are no more useful for stopping most illegal drugs because the majority of them — like the people — are coming across the bridges and ports of entry. This fact is buried in plain sight every year in the first few pages of the Drug Enforcement Agency’s yearly National Drug Threat Assessment, which calls Mexican transnational criminal organizations, or TCOs, the “greatest criminal drug threat” to the country. “The most common method employed by these TCOs involves transporting illicit drugs through U.S. ports of entry (POEs) in passenger vehicles with concealed compartments or commingled with legitimate goods on tractor trailers,” the 2017 report said. Walls won’t stop that — or the dope that’s flying aboard drones, flung from catapults, shot out of cannons or sent in the mail. In Texas, smugglers typically sneak weed over the Rio Grande, but they tend to hide the expensive stuff like heroin — chiva in Mexican slang — in vehicles driven over bridges or ports of entry that are crawling with law enforcement. Mexican heroin has contributed to a huge spike in opioid deaths in recent years, and they’re smuggling chiva right under the noses of the cops at the border crossings. link |
....I'd like to see some fiscal responsibility but neither party seems to seek that anymore.
:hammer:Do you have a clue how many billions we spend on illegals, from healthcare to prisons to services to schools? And all Trump wants is five crappy billion? What the hell is the matter with people like you.
And now we have LEGAL immigrant, who followed the rules, and loved his new country so much that he chose to serve as a police officer, and now he is MURDERED because of people like YOU and your love of illegal aliens?
Do us all a favor and step off the planet.You are a waste of skin and a waste good good breathable air.
^ I can sum up your post on one word: Stupidity
Actually, that's the word I can use to sum up all of your posts.
Speaking of a border wall...
Mulvaney in 2015: Trump's views on border wall are 'almost childish and simplistic'.....
I'd rather listen to the opinion of someone who actually guards and enforces the border:
Mexicans see models of Trump’s ‘impenetrable’ wall, and they’re not impressed...
...one irony of building these brawny prototypes at this location is that San Diego has long demonstrated the weakness of walls. Nowhere is more famous for its sophisticated border tunnels than this industrial sprawl near the Otay Mesa border crossing. The drug lord Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, now imprisoned in New York, disrupted the narcotics trade...
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/08/03/underworld-monte-reel
...by building "super-tunnels" here that were dozens of feet deep, equipped with elevators and ventilation and lighting, to move vast amounts of cocaine into California. Seven tunnels of various sizes...
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...d-smuggling-tunnel-in-san-diego-idUSKCN1B700N
...have been identified by the San Diego sector of the Border Patrol just this year.
The ground here, as one U.S. official put it, "is like Swiss cheese."
Trump has pledged that the border wall will stop illegal immigrants and drugs. CBP officials ( U.S. Customs and Border Protection), however, said the walls under consideration are likely to not go deep enough to block large, sophisticated tunnels.
Your ignorance just becomes a blur after a while.
Mexicans see models of Trump’s ‘impenetrable’ wall, and they’re not impressed