The article you cited doesn't say anything close to what you claim it does. Which is no surprise to anyone here. I'm just noting the fact.
The article you cited doesn't say anything close to what you claim it does. Which is no surprise to anyone here. I'm just noting the fact.
Hey, I'm closer to the truth than anything you've written.
Once again, you are projecting . . .
How are you with forging that e-mail?
Oh, wait everyone! The Barbarian, Slayer of Babies, is about to link some articles which don't, in any way support his position, but then he'll act like it does. Afterwards, he will behave sanctimonious like a good Satan worshipper does. Maybe he'll link another satirical article and present it as fact.
You seriously don't see the irony with this little rant?
Hey, I'm closer to the truth than anything you've written.
The article you cited doesn't say anything close to what you claim it does. Which is no surprise to anyone here. I'm just noting the fact.
I'm just pointing out the fact. Anyone can go to your link and see for themselves that you just made up your story; Brietbart says nothing close to what you said it does. When you think you have to make Breitbart more crazy than it already is, that's really pitiful.
https://www.breitbart.com/law-and-or...ational-guard/
You obviously don't. How are you doing with your reading lessons?
The article you cited doesn't say anything close to what you claim it does. Which is no surprise to anyone here. I'm just noting the fact.
I'm just pointing out the fact. Anyone can go to your link and see for themselves that you just made up your story; Brietbart says nothing close to what you said it does. When you think you have to make Breitbart more crazy than it already is, that's really pitiful.
https://www.breitbart.com/law-and-or...ational-guard/
The article you cited doesn't say anything close to what you claim it does. Which is no surprise to anyone here. I'm just noting the fact.
I'm just pointing out the fact. Anyone can go to your link and see for themselves that you just made up your story; Brietbart says nothing close to what you said it does. When you think you have to make Breitbart more crazy than it already is, that's really pitiful.
https://www.breitbart.com/law-and-or...ational-guard/
Well, I was right about the sanctimonious part. I'm still waiting for the rest of it.
In case, you'all are wondering. The Barbarian, Slayer of Babies, said that President Trump murdered his youngest daughter's husband's father because President Trump downplayed the China virus in February - he has the tape.
I think most people could see that I was being silly.
Well, I was right about the sanctimonious part. I'm still waiting for the rest of it.
In case, you'all are wondering. The Barbarian, Slayer of Babies, said that President Trump murdered his youngest daughter's husband's father because President Trump downplayed the China virus in February - he has the tape.
I call that a bit of a stretch, but since The Barbarian likes such idiocy, I used his logic to add his moniker and post this particular article title. And this sort of silly logic and argument is what The Barbarian, Slayer of Babies, and Arthur No-Brain have been using for quite some time. I think most people could see that I was being silly.
Unfortunately, this logic is used so often by The Barbarian, Slayer of Babies, and Arthur No-Brain, they actually can't see that I'm making fun of them.
Hey, I'm closer to the truth than anything you've written.
Once again, you are projecting . . .
How are you with forging that e-mail?
Oh, wait everyone! The Barbarian, Slayer of Babies, is about to link some articles which don't, in any way support his position, but then he'll act like it does. Afterwards, he will behave sanctimonious like a good Satan worshipper does. Maybe he'll link another satirical article and present it as fact.
I think most people could see that I was being silly.