I wasn't talking about most, or how many. I was only wondering what type of statues a conservative might go after. Is there an equivalent to the Confederacy monuments?
Since i would do no such thing, do tell how i would answer that.
I wasn't talking about most, or how many. I was only wondering what type of statues a conservative might go after. Is there an equivalent to the Confederacy monuments?
By putting yourself in someone else's shoes? This isn't that difficult. Forget the vandalism thing for a moment. Is there a category of monuments that conservatives wouldn't support?Since i would do no such thing, do tell how i would answer that.
It goes both ways though, doesn't it? :think:
The point is that no one forced Disney to stop making copies of 'Song of the South'.
By putting yourself in someone else's shoes? This isn't that difficult. Forget the vandalism thing for a moment. Is there a category of monuments that conservatives wouldn't support?
By putting yourself in someone else's shoes? This isn't that difficult. Forget the vandalism thing for a moment. Is there a category of monuments that conservatives wouldn't support?
You already did and I read it entirely.Think I am going to throw up
No, by asking you to forget vandalism I was no longer talking about conservatives being vandals.sorry, i cant imagine being a vandal, period. You are asking me to forget vandalism, when we are talking about why a Conservative would be a vandal like a lot of liberals are.
No, by asking you to forget vandalism I was no longer talking about conservatives being vandals.lain:
Here is the question I asked: Is there a category of monuments that conservatives wouldn't support?Ok, then what are you asking
Here is the question I asked: Is there a category of monuments that conservatives wouldn't support?
You already did and I read it entirely.lain: Otherwise, as with Tam and Angel this is what I expect in response to reason from people who lack a demonstrated command of the facts and control of their emotions. Ah, well. Can't wait on the next exciting upchuck or smiley. I'm sure it will be riveting.
Such as?Wouldnt support, yes,
To reason? When are you going to start using some reason in your posts?
I already have, and you've responded with smilies, block quotes and single sentence nothings. I'm not going to repeat myself for you any more than you're going to contend with fact. Just stew in that fairy tale you've bought into, leave off reading what the people who started the war said about why, the conduct of it, ect. Be happy. Time will take care of the rest.To reason? When are you going to start using some reason in your posts?
Such as?
That thread, shows political corrections stops and allows for all kinds of things, some people now think its ok for perverts to teach children perversion.
You actually made my point, the "force" is the majority attitudes, and fear of being sued is a huge force.
Not really. Though WoO had a good candidate with a Harvey Milk statue. If LGBT rights monuments started popping up there might be some opposition.you asked me to imagine others, i cant think of any right now that i personally have an issue with, got any suggestions?
You must see some parallel. You are offended by a library hosting 'story time with drag queens' and prefer that it is stopped. Others are offended by confederate icons having monuments and prefer they are stopped.
The parallel may not be history or content but both involve an outcry of public opinion over taxpayer funding that offends some on opposite sides of the political spectrum.