It's stupid to deface someone else's property. It's almost as goofy to suggest the vandal is a racist in this instance. Like suggesting a man who detests alcohol to the point where he feels compelled to vandalize the liquor cabinet of an alcoholic must be an alcoholic himself.More from emboldened liberal racists.
Deeds of emboldened liberals.
![]()
Frankly, you guys are hypocrites....
You hypocrites want to tear down the southern memorials and that's it....I'm asking about the Lincoln memorial....why does that get to stay?
I don't agree with vandalizing public or private property, so we'll split on that. It's not the way to handle differences.I can't figure out how I'm supposed to be embarrassed by that. Sorry. It's not wrong. If you can't figure out the problem with revering icons of the Confederacy, you've got a bigger problem.
Emboldened racist liberals on the prowl again.
![]()
I don't agree with vandalizing public or private property, so we'll split on that. It's not the way to handle differences.
Neither is Tam hiding from argument while she hurls unsupportable nonsense at people she won't engage then spams the thread with another ream of photos (some of which may not be actual instances of vandalism) in lieu.
This is what your sort of irrationality breeds, fantasy and speculation feeding upon it. A vicious circle.
See that guy, with the hose, trying to wash away the truth. Shame on him.
Yeah, sure, you shouldn't vandalize people's property, they can take that claim down to the police station and file a report. But making a public monument on public grounds to these abhorrent acts is the real shame.
I wouldn't do it. But that doesn't make the message wrong, and I would say that the monument is the more monumental wrong.
You're the one with the problem StalinI can't figure out how I'm supposed to be embarrassed by that. Sorry. It's not wrong. If you can't figure out the problem with revering icons of the Confederacy, you've got a bigger problem.