He absolutely was, but he's not being memorialized for his role in allowing that institution to continue.
This statue could be replaced with one of Cpl. Roman Ducksworth, who was forced off a bus and shot to death by a police officer who it is believed mistakenly thought the serviceman was a freedom rider. He was, in fact, a military police officer on leave to visit his sick wife.Confederate General Williams Carter Wickham statue in Monroe Park in Richmond, Virginia.
You can lie to yourself, but don't waste them on me. Lee was on that New Orleans pedestal not in the civilian garb he wore when he did so much for them, but in the Confederate garb he wore supporting that disgraceful cause and the institution of slavery it served.That's the point.....Neither are these other monuments....
This statue could be replaced with one of Cpl. Roman Ducksworth, who was forced off a bus and shot to death by a police officer who it is believed mistakenly thought the serviceman was a freedom rider. He was, in fact, a military police officer on leave to visit his sick wife.
You can lie to yourself, but don't waste them on me. Lee was on that New Orleans pedestal not in the civilian garb he wore when he did so much for them, but in the Confederate garb he wore supporting that disgraceful cause and the institution of slavery it served.
Perhaps it's time they were.I'm trying to not show what they really do, as graphic evidence exists because they promote it. I don't want to post it because I know kids use the internet. And they are not ready for the details.
Yeppers.That's the point.....Neither are these other monuments....
Ulysses S. Grant (slave owner)
![]()
[MENTION=3698]Tambora[/MENTION], as you can see, they really get upset when one posts that monuments such as Lincoln's need to be removed as well if you follow their line of thinking...
What you don't know would educate you.Talk about a lie.....I'm sorry you were bottlefed in public school.
No, you assumptive goof. I come from a family descended from one of those people. When I came up that lionization was at a premium and institutionalized in Southern culture in a way that didn't invite or allow other considerations. It never occurred to me to question it, even as I was taught to despise the evil that proceeded from it.I understand totally how you came to this conclusion, as it was driven in your brain since birth.
No, you're just not thinking rationally enough on the point to distinguish the qualification. Put Truman in the sheet and I'm in opposition.Bunch of flaming hypocrites.....
Sure. Lincoln was a Republican too. But those dems moved to the Republican party when it fled its own traditions. The South remains largely Republican to this day.All Democrats.
Asserted and answered, which is why you keep talking to the choir instead.Yeppers.
Again, beside the point, given he's not being memorialized for that particular while those Confederate "gentlemen" stand or ride in full uniform and support of that odious cause are, prima facie, by virtue of how they are presented and what distinguishes most of them from others of their day.Martin Van Buren (slave owner)
Except that you don't follow our line of thinking and don't engage when corrected. So, there's that.
[MENTION=3698]Tambora[/MENTION], as you can see, they really get upset when one posts that monuments such as Lincoln's need to be removed as well if you follow their line of thinking...
He personally owned a slave for 2 years and then freed him in 1859 rather than sell him.Grant freed his slave.
How is your liberty tied to the monuments?Taking down our monuments is taking away our liberties. That's ok with you too it seems.
Grant freed his slave.
Again, beside the point, given he's not being memorialized for that particular while those Confederate "gentlemen" stand or ride in full uniform and support of that odious cause are, prima facie, by virtue of how they are presented and what distinguishes most of them from others of their day.