ClimateSanity
New member
There are 7.5 billion people in the world of which 80% live on less than 10 dollars a day. One of the reasons given for giving amnesty to people who came here illegally is that they are desperately poor. Why is Mexico singled out as the only poor people worthy of amnesty? Is it the relatively easy access? Why not hire out 100 cruise ships to start bringing in every person in the world living on less than $10 a day? We can't support it???
No duh!!!!!
If we can't support that many, it stands to reason there is a level below 100% where great harm to existing citizens occurs. I assert that the level of immigration achieved by 1973 was already beginning to hurt our citizens. Average wages for working class males has remained stagnant since 1973. It seems obvious to me that an influx of low skilled, uneducated immigrants since the new 1965 immigration law was passed is largely responsible for this.
My question to pro amnesty folks is this:
What percentage of the desperately poor who earn less than 10 dollars a day have a right to become citizens once they arrive here through illegal means?
No duh!!!!!
If we can't support that many, it stands to reason there is a level below 100% where great harm to existing citizens occurs. I assert that the level of immigration achieved by 1973 was already beginning to hurt our citizens. Average wages for working class males has remained stagnant since 1973. It seems obvious to me that an influx of low skilled, uneducated immigrants since the new 1965 immigration law was passed is largely responsible for this.
My question to pro amnesty folks is this:
What percentage of the desperately poor who earn less than 10 dollars a day have a right to become citizens once they arrive here through illegal means?