glorydaz
Well-known member
I think you are confused.
Christ means God/LORD/Father.
Really? Then why would God/LORD/Father need to be anointed? :chew:
I think you are confused.
Christ means God/LORD/Father.
Address simple LOGIC (which you have NO CLUE about).Jesus is God. So why do you have such a hard time accepting that Christ means the same as God and LORD?
I gave you scriptures that prove Christ, LORD, and God were used interchangeably.
Address those scriptures.
Really? Then why would God/LORD/Father need to be anointed? :chew:
Address simple LOGIC (which you have NO CLUE about).
That the LORD Jesus is BOTH GOD and CHRIST does NOT make these terms identical.
I am both a SON and a FATHER.... that does NOT MAKE SON AND FATHER MEAN THE SAME THING.
Your stupidity is immense.
Once again proving yourself to be dumber than a snail.So you don't believe Jesus is God?
No, you did not.AGAIN, I gave you scriptures that used the words Christ, LORD, and God INTERCHANGEABLY.
Jesus is God. So why do you have such a hard time accepting that Christ means the same as God and LORD?
I gave you scriptures that prove Christ, LORD, and God were used interchangeably.
Address those scriptures.
Don't put this onto me. You were the one who wanted more praise....that was clear from your words, and it's clear from what you just said in the yellow above.
As far as his testimony goes, I see he is a seeker, and will go no further.
I didn't pick apart or mock him for his testimony, as you falsely claim. :nono:
I will pick apart anyone's distortion of what the Scripture says, and will continue to do so....with him or with you...wherever I see distortion and twisting.
No, you did not.
The terms are NOT INTERCHANGEABLE.
Because it does not mean that. That's a fact. You don't get to redefine words to fit your theology.
GT and God's Truth can be used to refer to a person on Theology online, but that doesn't mean that GT OR God's Truth mean "poster on Theology online." It's just who they are.
The DEFINITION of a word is not what the word IS, it's what the word MEANS.
We are saying that while Christ can be used interchangeably with God and LORD, because they are one, it DOES NOT MEAN that Christ means LORD. "CHRIST" means "ANOINTED."
Death is the physical body dying and the spirit going to hell/prison, or paradise.
That is right and how do you ever get that it means Jesus was without the Father? How do you ever get that Jesus died Spiritually?
Sin separates us from God.
How do you get Jesus sacrificing himself would separate him from the Father?
SpoilerIsaiah 53:7 says, "He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth."
Isaiah 53:8 He was taken from prison and from judgment: and who shall declare his generation? for he was cut off out of the land of the living: for the transgression of my people was he stricken.
Isaiah 53:12 Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great, and he shall divide the spoil with the strong; because he has poured out his soul unto death: and he was numbered with the transgressors; and he bore the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.
God forsaking him is about God not stopping his suffering and death.
That's NOT THE POINT, GT!You really are reaching aren't you. You are wrong. The words Christ, LORD, and God were used interchangeably because they are the same and about the same one and only God.
Jesus is God. So why do you have such a hard time accepting that Christ means the same as God and LORD?
I gave you scriptures that prove Christ, LORD, and God were used interchangeably.
Address those scriptures.
So then why did Paul say
Do you not keep in memory what you yourself just said?
If sin separates us from God, don't you think that if Jesus BECAME sin, He would be separated from God?
That's not what I said. I said that Jesus becoming sin would separate Him from His Father.
All of those support my point, that Jesus became sin and was therefore separated from the Father.
Please explain how you get that from that verse.
If Christ went willingly (and He did), He wouldn't have complained about God not stopping His suffering and death. That would be pointless. Yet you're trying to show that He complained while on the cross because of His suffering and death.
Jesus never complained about something He had to do, especially something He wanted to do.
You really are reaching aren't you. You are wrong. The words Christ, LORD, and God were used interchangeably because they are the same and about the same one and only God.
I finished my post. Please reread it.You really are all mixed up.
I gave you scripture from the old testament that proves Jesus suffering and dying on the cross is about being forsaken and not saved from it. Jesus was fulfilling the scriptures when he said that.
Do you or not believe Jesus was God when he walked the earth? Yes? So then how do you ever get that God could separate Himself from himself?
Jesus is the Lord and the Spirit. Jesus went to prison/hell and preached the gospel there. Don't you believe the scriptures that say that? Jesus also raised himself. Don't you believe that?
You really are all mixed up.
I gave you scripture from the old testament that proves Jesus suffering and dying on the cross is about being forsaken and not saved from it. Jesus was fulfilling the scriptures when he said that.
Do you or not believe Jesus was God when he walked the earth? Yes? So then how do you ever get that God could separate Himself from himself?
Jesus is the Lord and the Spirit. Jesus went to prison/hell and preached the gospel there. Don't you believe the scriptures that say that? Jesus also raised himself. Don't you believe that?
That's NOT THE POINT, GT!
We're not talking about the different names of God and how they can be used interchangeably, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE DEFINITIONS OF THOSE NAMES!
HOW DENSE CAN YOU BE!
There you go....denying the humanity of the Lord Jesus Christ. :think:
If a person can use a name interchangeably then it is the same. They are synonymous.