Nazaroo
New member
Except that "Matthew"s Sermon on the Mount is not a historical event.
Its a contrived attempt to summarize both Jesus' teachings, James' teachings, and Paul's teachings,
blended by church interpretation over about a half-century, post-split with the Jewish religious community.
Its presented in Matthew as the first public speech of Jesus,
yet is obviously addressed to a mature, fully formed church,
which didn't exist in Jesus' earthly ministry.
We know from earlier and more truly historically accurate documents like Luke and Mark,
that Jesus' first public addresses to Jewish communities were quite different.
Its a contrived attempt to summarize both Jesus' teachings, James' teachings, and Paul's teachings,
blended by church interpretation over about a half-century, post-split with the Jewish religious community.
Its presented in Matthew as the first public speech of Jesus,
yet is obviously addressed to a mature, fully formed church,
which didn't exist in Jesus' earthly ministry.
We know from earlier and more truly historically accurate documents like Luke and Mark,
that Jesus' first public addresses to Jewish communities were quite different.