ECT The Rebellion that Desolates

[Interplanner]

He's not worth talking to when it has been written out 100x already. You know, STP, you could go back and do some reading. You are just sitting there like this is a game where people like to see you write Made Up. You get a big kick out of cute clipped speech instead of the work of background discovery. Since that's 99% of what you do, I have no interest in any further time with you.

All the historical reasons, references and conclusions have been written out many times before.

 

[Interplanner]

Gosh, can it be? It might even be in THIS post! At least as much as we need to know. What a concept.

 

[Interplanner]

What kind of identity would matter? Drivers' license? If the events of Mt24A and Thess have happened, and the place was destroyed, and 'the wrath of God has come upon them fully' that's that. For the 1000th time, there are three passages validating a delay in the end of the world, which we know was not right after 72AD was it? so what do you need to know for, as you make an industry out of bludgeoning Christ's rebuke not to know when the kingdom of Israel, and as we are to only gain power to preach that his is Lord and Christ? Do you do that?

 

[Danoh]

What kind of identity would matter? Drivers' license? If the events of Mt24A and Thess have happened, and the place was destroyed, and 'the wrath of God has come upon them fully' that's that. For the 1000th time, there are three passages validating a delay in the end of the world, which we know was not right after 72AD was it? so what do you need to know for, as you make an industry out of bludgeoning Christ's rebuke not to know when the kingdom of Israel, and as we are to only gain power to preach that his is Lord and Christ? Do you do that?

Lol - where others use the phrase "for the 1000th time" as a figurative, yours is actually the literal - you - "a figure of speech" nut job, if there ever was one :chuckle:

 

[Interplanner]

A person simply has to distinguish between things about 1st century Judea and things about the final judgement of the world, expected right after the other.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

A person simply has to distinguish between things about 1st century Judea and things about the final judgement of the world, expected right after the other.

You made that up. Why?
Who is, or was, the man of sin? Give us a name

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Gosh, can it be? It might even be in THIS post! At least as much as we need to know. What a concept.

:freak:

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

What kind of identity would matter? Drivers' license?

His name will do. If all the world wondered after him, you should at least be able to provide a name.
Who set up an image in the temple, and demanded to be worshiped as God?

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

His name will do. If all the world wondered after him, you should at least be able to provide a name.
Who set up an image in the temple, and demanded to be worshiped as God?

:idunno:

 

[Right Divider]

His name will do. If all the world wondered after him, you should at least be able to provide a name.
Who set up an image in the temple, and demanded to be worshiped as God?

This should be SOOOO easy for the great historian and MAD basher, IP.

 

[Interplanner]

Did you check the OP? Gosh, there might be a clue there. In fact, it might 3-part.

Do you ever read the earlier threads and have something other than the auto-reaction you usually have--commentaries are sin, history is sin, Josephus is sin...

Don't forget the page of the Rev says it is at hand, about to happen...

don't forget that 'gea' often just means the land of Israel, ie, the whole country of Israel followed the guy.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Did you check the OP? Gosh, there might be a clue there. In fact, it might 3-part.

Do you ever read the earlier threads and have something other than the auto-reaction you usually have--commentaries are sin, history is sin, Josephus is sin...

Don't forget the page of the Rev says it is at hand, about to happen...

don't forget that 'gea' often just means the land of Israel, ie, the whole country of Israel followed the guy.

So, what's his name?

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Don't forget the page of the Rev says it is at hand, about to happen...

Don't forget that it was a vision, a prophecy, and John was IN THE DAY OF THE LORD when he said this.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Do you ever read the earlier threads and have something other than the auto-reaction you usually have--commentaries are sin, history is sin, Josephus is sin...

It's sin to use these things to justify unbelief of the scripture (which is your M.O.)

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

don't forget that 'gea' often just means the land of Israel, ie, the whole country of Israel followed the guy.

Who can make war with the beast? Who demanded worship as God, in the temple, after setting up an image?
Who performed lying signs and wonders?

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Who can make war with the beast? Who demanded worship as God, in the temple, after setting up an image?
Who performed lying signs and wonders?

:idunno:

 

[Interplanner]

anyone familiar with the basics of the decimation of Israel in that generation would not be concerned with only 'identifying' the guy. The point is Dan 9:27 took place.

As usual, I maintain that the end of the world was expected right after it, but was delayed. Because we all have to account for two things: the numerous immediate expectations in 'this generation' and the fact that we are here today.

Paul's directions about marriage and the end of the world are not in I Cor 10.

You may need to check your translating as 'ta tely ton aiones' is not generally rendered as the ends (plural) but the one end of the plural (preceding) ages. There are too many other examples for the translators to go your route.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

anyone familiar with the basics of the decimation of Israel in that generation would not be concerned with only 'identifying' the guy. The point is Dan 9:27 took place.

As usual, I maintain that the end of the world was expected right after it, but was delayed. Because we all have to account for two things: the numerous immediate expectations in 'this generation' and the fact that we are here today.

Paul's directions about marriage and the end of the world are not in I Cor 10.

You may need to check your translating as 'ta tely ton aiones' is not generally rendered as the ends (plural) but the one end of the plural (preceding) ages. There are too many other examples for the translators to go your route.

Who is he?

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

The point is Dan 9:27 took place.

It did not. Who did it?

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

There are too many other examples for the translators to go your route.

:chuckle:

His final authority: a slew of translators, a slew of commentaries, a slew of opinions