ECT The Nation of Israel was not at the last supper

Status
Not open for further replies.
I

Interplanner

Well-known member
Nang said:
None of the MADs have ever given answer to the question as to how national Israel will inherit the land or what will be left of the city of Jerusalem, when this entire world will be destroyed with fire at the Lord's return. II Peter 3:10-12
Click to expand...



Their view is always divided and partitioned. They belong in 1960 S. Africa I guess. And they think heaven is so wonderful that way.

Btw, isn't it anti-semitic to confine Jews to earth while the rest of us are somewhere else. Chew that!
 
Nang

Nang

TOL Subscriber
Right Divider said:
There will be a NEW heaven and a NEW earth. Read the Bible.
Click to expand...

:duh:

Yes, which are the heavens and new earth as revealed in Revelation Chapters 21-22, which is the spiritual and heavenly Kingdom of God . . the New Jerusalem . . of which the earthly city of Jerusalem only foreshadowed and typed.
 
I

Interplanner

Well-known member
Right Divider said:
There will be a NEW heaven and a NEW earth. Read the Bible.
Click to expand...





Yes, the NHNE, not a 2nd round for Judaism and Judea. Not anywhere in the NT. It should be at Heb 9:28, if it was going to matter. it does not. There is no need and it will not happen. Everything that 'needs' to happen at the 2nd coming is in: Heb 9, 2 Peter 3, I Cor 15, Acts 17, Rom 2, 8, 2 Tim 4 (already underway), matching Mt 24B and its parallels.
 
I

Interplanner

Well-known member
Right Divider said:
For the MILLIONTH time, the land promise was already WELL understood and did NOT need to be REPEATED in EVERY passage in scripture.

Your stupid cancellationist premise leaves you unable to understand anything.
Click to expand...





But they don't ever mention it. They don't mention it yet they know perfectly well that the place is going to be decimated, never to be raised again, because that is what 'all wrath' and 'desolation' means. Can't you see that it is at least strange that it never comes up in 3 chapters of material in hebrews, nor in rom 11, nor in 2 cor 3-5 on the new covenant, nor in Acts 13 or 26? Isn't that at least suspicious? It never shows in any of those passages, so it is phantom.

anything that would involve the land would mean the redoing of the worship system, which is not going to happen in any validated sense. In case you meant in a destructive, anti-Christian sense, but your meaning seems to affirm it.

Save your self some credibility and don't bother with your declarations of dumb and stupid which are simply ignored. If you have reasons, hey, bring them on.
 
SaulToPaul 2

SaulToPaul 2

Well-known member
Interplanner said:
But they don't ever mention it. They don't mention it yet they know perfectly well that the place is going to be decimated, never to be raised again, because that is what 'all wrath' and 'desolation' means. Can't you see that it is at least strange that it never comes up in 3 chapters of material in hebrews, nor in rom 11, nor in 2 cor 3-5 on the new covenant, nor in Acts 13 or 26? Isn't that at least suspicious? It never shows in any of those passages, so it is phantom.

anything that would involve the land would mean the redoing of the worship system, which is not going to happen in any validated sense. In case you meant in a destructive, anti-Christian sense, but your meaning seems to affirm it.

Save your self some credibility and don't bother with your declarations of dumb and stupid which are simply ignored. If you have reasons, hey, bring them on.
Click to expand...

Huh, rambler?
 
Right Divider

Right Divider

Body part
Interplanner said:
Yes, the NHNE, not a 2nd round for Judaism and Judea. Not anywhere in the NT. It should be at Heb 9:28, if it was going to matter. it does not. There is no need and it will not happen. Everything that 'needs' to happen at the 2nd coming is in: Heb 9, 2 Peter 3, I Cor 15, Acts 17, Rom 2, 8, 2 Tim 4 (already underway), matching Mt 24B and its parallels.
Click to expand...
False premise -> false conclusion.
 
Tambora

Tambora

Get your armor ready!
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Right Divider said:
For the MILLIONTH time, the land promise was already WELL understood and did NOT need to be REPEATED in EVERY passage in scripture.

Your stupid cancellationist premise leaves you unable to understand anything.
Click to expand...
Right.
IP would have folks believe that anything in the OT that is not repeated verbatim in the NT is just not needed.
That's just plain stupidity.
 
D

DAN P

Well-known member
northwye said:
Are there verses in the New Testament about whether the Old Covenant goes on after the Cross or it ends?
Click to expand...

Hi and read 2 Cor 3:14 and this is AFTER the cross !!

Vrese 16 explains how Jews were and are saved today !!

dan p
 
D

DAN P

Well-known member
Interplanner said:
You bulwarked his point DanP.
Click to expand...


Hi and my answer is my defense , that the LAW was still in effect , even UNTIL Paul's time and that did not understand what they were reading and still do not understand what the OT means !!

Verse 16 explains how Jews are saved today or will you explain verse 16 ??

dan p
 
D

Danoh

New member
SaulToPaul said:
Speak plainly.
Click to expand...

That just reflects the guy is well read in many...a book "about."

Sort of like how some cannot but end up using a KJV-ism here and there, due to their extensive time in the KJV.

He is just being the bookworm he obviously is...

Rom. 5:8
Acts 17:11, 12.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top