SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
The Galatians and Ephesians had much different paths into the Body.
Your dusty books of men didn't tell you this.
:idunno:
The Galatians and Ephesians had much different paths into the Body.
Your dusty books of men didn't tell you this.
Why on earth would say such a stupid thing?
The Galatians and Ephesians had much different paths into the Body.
Your dusty books of men didn't tell you this.
Are these the same thing:
1. heirs by promise
2. fellowheirs by the gospel
There is no difference, and you already indicated your Hebraic ignorance in your denial of parallelism (two lines of speech or lyric that repeat at thought).
You are infected with division instead of coherence and unification. Those two things are said to be the same in Gal 3:8 which to you is poison because you think he saying the land promise was a gospel and was not talking about Christ. He was talking about Christ and Christ was the promise and is through Christ that you and I inherit the NHNE and everything you say is crap. You try to smother every NT passage that matters with 2P2P muck and you never talk specifics. YOu just 'sound' like you know something that matters.
Can two groups have two different paths into the same destination?
What is the destination?
The Body of Christ.
Do you live in a high elevation? I don't think that you're getting enough oxygen.What is the destination? In the NT, the destination is the mission of the Gospel to the end of time. There is one Lord, life, gate, way, truth, body, baptism, faith, etc, to that. Be suspicious of believers who immediately disqualify you because you merely base yourself on that (on Christ), because they have the 'real' thing that everyone is 'missing.'
Yes, but no land promise, nor need for one. and the body is not separate from the church or Christians or new covenant fellowship ministers.
There is one Lord, life, gate, way, truth, body, baptism,
I suspect that you practice water baptism. Am I correct?
Back to my point:
Before entrance into the Body of Christ, the Galatians were in the promises of God and could claim Abraham as their father. The Ephesians were not and could not claim Abraham as their father.
But the twain were made one.
So according to IP logic, this makes everyone an Ephesian?Wrong again. The letter to Ephesians was a circular to everyone.
So according to IP logic, this makes everyone an Ephesian?
Back to my point:
Before entrance into the Body of Christ, the Galatians were in the promises of God and could claim Abraham as their father. The Ephesians were not and could not claim Abraham as their father.
But the twain were made one.
Nonsense.
:chuckle:
heirs according to the promise vs. strangers from the covenants of promise
Thanks for another useless opinion.That is not the appropriate contrast; you are mucking it up.