I agree with your scriptural example, that this was a playing out of Matthew 18:17
Thumb.
==PS
Also, your example definitely shows that the Apostles were concerned with the behavior of Christians, according to Paul here explicitly, how we behave should influence how we are treated by other Christians, and this gets at what I was saying in a lengthy post above, about how if the propositions of Calvinism are taken to be true, then logic demands the conclusion that it ultimately does not matter at all what we do or what we don't do, in the eternal perspective, which of course overrides every other perspective, no matter how much we might want to say that it's very important that nobody murders or rapes or bears false witness against anybody in a court of law.
And this means that Calvinism conflicts fatally with Scripture, since it is abundantly obvious in the Scripture that all of the Apostles and Christ Himself were very concerned with our behavior.
That isn't how most Calvinists argue, the last point of TULIP is Perseverance, meaning they are a new creation that will not do as you suggest. We have to be careful, because I could say this to anyone who quotes Romans 8:1,2 There is therefore, now no condemnation, for those who are in Christ Jesus, for the Power of the Spirit has set you free from the Law of sin and death.
Most Calvinists I know quote Ephesians 2:10 "we are HIS workmanship...." It means God is doing it, not that we get away with anything. Hebrews 12 says God disciplines those He loves. So, it isn't so much about behavior, as it is about 'relationship.' While I agree we SHOULD behave, the reasons aren't the same. I won't lose salvation for being a punk. I may not 'be' a Christian as a punk, still in the flesh, but only God (and I) know if I am a new creation. It is best, not just with Calvinists, but all Christians, not to confuse the two. We also have to be careful not to just address any one group though certainly we are dealing with double-pred Calvinists in thread.
To be a convinced Calvinist is to fundamentally disagree with them, and to instead hold the view that our behavior in the final, eternal analysis does not matter, which suggests that it is at least a reasonable view, to not worry about our behavior at all, and to permit if not outright approve of all sorts of things, even evil things. Since, whether we are elect or not is the sole governing factor in our eternal destiny, and not whether we avoid murder and rape and bearing false witness in a court of law.
1) I don't believe any Christian, let alone a Calvinist (doesn't have to be the scapegoat here),is going to 'want' to do anything but the will of Christ. We, in Christ, want to follow Him.
2) I agree with Calvinist and Mid Acts: Behavior isn't the mark. "In Christ" is the mark. If a man/woman murder, they will pay for it here. If not a believer, then eternity as well.
3) Your argument, after a fashion, would condemn the thief on the cross. He needed grace. Ephesians 2:8,9 says "By grace you are saved though faith....not by works (obedience included).
Ultimately Calvinism's ethics is empty, it's equal in most every way to nihilism and absolute moral relativism, which we all know even without much thought are both completely wrong.
I don't know many immoral Calvinists or MAD. Anyone that is a new creature in Christ desires Him, desires to please Him, desires and values what He does.
We believe in human rights, we believe that they were given to us by God, and that to injure any of them in others would be a true crime, deserving of serious penalty. Like the rights against being murdered, being raped, and being falsely testified against in a court of law. We cannot and do not accept that evildoers enter the Kingdom of God when they perish, we know that they don't,
:*( The thief on the cross never made it then. Jesus didn't come for the sick, then. Just for those who 'needed a "little" help.'
Romans 10:9,10,13
we know that what they do matters, and it doesn't save Calvinism to state something like, If a man is reprobate (i.e. not elect), and he commits atrocious evil, it isn't the evil he does that forfeits his eternal salvation, but that he wasn't elect.
It depends. David murdered Uriah. God called him a 'man after His Own heart.' How? Faith. It is the only answer I know.
God is in the business of Salvation and He knows how to save those who are perishing 'to the uttermost.' Hebrews 7:25 (Romans, Galatians, and Hebrews, all great theology primer books though I believe most need help with Hebrews).
To protest that Calvinism doesn't support this conclusion, which is certainly true of Calvinists, generally, misses the point that it is the two propositions of Calvinism that I'm condemning here, that all Calvinists believe are true: If a man is elect, there is nothing he can do to fail to be saved,
True, since it depends on the Savior. As Romans 9 says "Who can resist His will?" Perhaps (perhaps) Saul could have been defiant and went around blind the rest of his pharisaical life. Perhaps he couldn't really resist God's will. I'm not too caught up on the argument on either side. I try and remember I have nothing I have not been given nor to boast as if I weren't given it. It leaves all glory to God and seldom does it make me want accuse God of anything. It makes me kind'a'humble.
and if a man is not elect, there is nothing he can do to be saved.
If you ask them, they don't want to be saved thus. Go ask any man if they want to be saved that isn't saved. If they do, you've led one to Christ. If not, then they are making a choice. CAN God save them? Maybe with a lobotomy. At this point in my life, if I ever would even think about denying Him, I'd pray for that lobotomy. Better to enter heaven with one arm as it were.
It must be the case, if these two ideas are true, that what we do, does not matter in the longest of long views.
In a sense, you are right. It matters what He did.
And this simply contradicts the evidence of Scripture, where it is clearly shown that the Apostles, Christ, and the Church all believe that it very much does matter what we do.
In the sense that a new creation will do newly created works (Ephesians 2:10 2 Corinthians 5:17). Then of course it matters what we do.
1 Corinthians 3:13 talks about things that don't matter that will burn up. I'm not sure a Christian, loving Jesus, can but love Him and His church in return. "We love, because He first loved us." This doesn't mean perfection. I realize Catholics are very much caught up in this idea of perfection/glorification toward "sainthood." It isn't that you 'become' a saint. It is that you 'are a saint, so live as one in Christ.' Every day I pray to bless someone and make a difference, to point them toward eternal things. I do so because for me, it is ALL that matters. The rest is all dross. I want someone to have a greater picture of Jesus today because I was on the planet. It is my prayer daily. I sometimes 'feel' I fail but God is in control of His people and His desired outcome and 'works all things to good.' Romans 8:28 (love Romans 8).