freelight
Eclectic Theosophist
the subject at hand..............
the subject at hand..............
If you'd like to re-read the commentary on the Spirit of truth, it might do you good, since that is what the subject is about. If you have any points or criticisms to make on the text, you're welcome to comment.
Your assumption above is most absurd,...since the Bible does not need to mention a religious text by name coming out several centuries after its own writing, since these people had no knowledge at the time of such a thing. They got their knowledge/revelation during their times, and progressive revelatioin allows for new insights and revelations coming later, as man is able/capable and ready to receive them. - enter: dispensational revelations, in this case a new epochal revelation.
Its so silly and ignorant really to assume that the Bible has to mention the very name 'Urantia' for the Urantia Papers to be accepted. Again, a religious writing or any commentary on anything is to be taken upon the merit of its own content, but you are not considering or learning the actual content discussed in the papers, but creating a straw-man image to attack and belittle at every turn.
pj
the subject at hand..............
The Bible NEVER discussed the "Urantia Book!" If you believe it
did, give us the chapter and verses? And, remember, the verses
and chapters MUST mention the Urantia book, by title!
If you'd like to re-read the commentary on the Spirit of truth, it might do you good, since that is what the subject is about. If you have any points or criticisms to make on the text, you're welcome to comment.
Your assumption above is most absurd,...since the Bible does not need to mention a religious text by name coming out several centuries after its own writing, since these people had no knowledge at the time of such a thing. They got their knowledge/revelation during their times, and progressive revelatioin allows for new insights and revelations coming later, as man is able/capable and ready to receive them. - enter: dispensational revelations, in this case a new epochal revelation.
Its so silly and ignorant really to assume that the Bible has to mention the very name 'Urantia' for the Urantia Papers to be accepted. Again, a religious writing or any commentary on anything is to be taken upon the merit of its own content, but you are not considering or learning the actual content discussed in the papers, but creating a straw-man image to attack and belittle at every turn.
pj