SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
It is very clear and simple. Leave it alone.
Why don't you take this advice with Heb 8:8 (KJV)?
It is very clear and simple. Leave it alone.
Why don't you take this advice with Heb 8:8 (KJV)?
Do you think the naming of tribes limits it when the whole book is about the same salvation that is in Christ for all mankind? What a stupid deduction! And then the book has nothing about a Davidic theocracy since it is an unshakeable kingdom that is coming! And the book dismisses a Judaistic theocracy!
So I guess you don't realize that that line about the tribe names is like the other handful of 2P2P niches that are supposed to protect it from objections (Mt 23's 'until you say 'blessed is he...' or Rom 11:26 'all Israel...'). Not a chance.
Do you have any idea what Judea was going through at the time? No, because you mindlessly refuse to read historical background like Rhoades, etc. Why do you think the 'land was in danger of being burnt' was mentioned? Oh really, it has nothing at all to do with 1st century events and the whole thing has to do with events X000 years in the future?
Why does the other references to the new covenant in the NT show a living dynamic thing that is going out the nations and drawing them in and giving them the gift of justification from the debt of sin?
You are totally ignorant, leaning toward recycling Judaism, for some reason, like the opponents of the Gospel in Colossians with their neo-Judaism. It just wasn't prophetic-oriented; it went for imposing fresh torah commands.
Not silly. He meant in Rom 4:16 that those who believe recieve the same blessing as Abraham. It is 2P2P which systematically does NOT use those passages that say so, to protect 2 programs like RD just said yesterday, and they all eventually do: one in heaven for believers, one on earth for Jews.
OH, you don't believe what RD says (1000s of other 'experts' on the Bible) about 2 programs in 2 places?
Anyone reading the text and paying attention can see that their question was redirected to the receiving of power and that without knowing when it would happen, and that this happened in the Pentecost event. It is very clear and simple. Leave it alone.
The Bible, taken at face value, teaches different inheritances for different peoples.
That is why I subscribe to it.
Nope, it's Christ alone. I think we've finally hit on the real mistake you are promoting. Christ is the gift, the inheritance, the new creation. That is why the believers are all unified; and all other systems divide Christ up.
[/I]
I can't think of one place in the NT that makes any distinctions.
What is this NT?Nope, it's Christ alone. I think we've finally hit on the real mistake you are promoting. Christ is the gift, the inheritance, the new creation. That is why the believers are all unified; and all other systems divide Christ up.
I can't think of one place in the NT that makes any distinctions.
The passage what I quoted from Rev 21 is NHNE. This is where Christ's everlasting kingdom will exist.RD:
the question at hand is not clear to you. The question is: do we expect another episode of Judaism--sincere or deceptive or both--in human history before the 2nd coming and is is 'necessary' as a part of chain of sequenced events before the 2nd coming?
To quote a clearly NHNE passage about this does not deal with the question. The NHNE is very different physically from this world, since God is the temple and the Lamb is the light.
Just shows that you cannot understand most of the Bible.It will be interesting to see guys nursing gentile kings and leaders, huh? If you have to be literal!
You might try focusing on passages the NT quotes from the OT.
The passage what I quoted from Rev 21 is NHNE. This is where Christ's everlasting kingdom will exist.
Why don't you understand that passage and its matching passage in Isaiah?
Who ever said that there was? Just another windmill Don.I do. Neither are in our history before the 2nd coming.
:juggle:There is no Judaic Davidic theocracy going to happen, and what Isaiah is describing is not either, because by that time, he's referring to Christian believers, some of which are Jews.