HopeofGlory
New member
There is not ONE passage in the NT that says water baptism is SYMBOLIC of anything.
I agree.
In Christ
Craig
There is not ONE passage in the NT that says water baptism is SYMBOLIC of anything.
Originally posted by Freak
Hello Craig--
Was the baptism of Jesus not symbolic?
Matthew 28:18f – Here Jesus authorized His baptism – the (water) baptism that was to be “in His name”. Example: Acts 2:38. This baptism was put into practice within 50 days at most of this authorization from Jesus to do so!Give us one scripture that says the water baptism performed at Pentecost was NEW.
The old and new what ??Also, explain the differences between the old and the new.
I don’t know that I have one. But if there is or isn’t an OT prophecy regarding the water baptism Jesus authorized in Matthew 28, does that negate that water baptism ?? Does it void the authority Jesus was given by God and the HS in heaven & earth? Does it change the fact that this water baptism was taught and practiced by the apostles and disciples ??What OT scriptures foretold of your new water baptism that we may know it is true?
Originally posted by Apollos
Craig –
Matthew 28:18f – Here Jesus authorized His baptism – the (water) baptism that was to be “in His name”. Example: Acts
Jesus is telling them that ALL the power to remit sins has been given unto Him. Before this men had the power or authority to remit sins in water baptism. So then the change that occurred is that Jesus received all power not a new water baptism. This relinquishing of power coincides with the apostles inability to perform miracles.
The Baptist and Jesus foretold of this relinquishing.
I indeed have baptized you with water: but he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost...Mark 1:8
He must increase, but I must decrease (John 3:30) and... A man can receive nothing, except it be given him from heaven (John 3:27).
Ye sent unto John, and he bare witness unto the truth. John 5:33
But I receive not testimony from man: but these things I say, that ye might be saved. John 5:34
He was a burning and a shining light: and ye were willing for a season to rejoice in his light. John 5:35
But I have greater witness than that of John: for the works which the Father hath given me to finish, the same works that I do, bear witness of me, that the Father hath sent me. John 5:36
His baptism as you call it is...but he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost...Mark 1:8
You have chosen to believe that Jesus' reference to baptism means in water but that is not what He said....For John truly baptized with water; but (on the contrary) ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence. Acts 1:5
Yes, Jesus foretold of a new baptism but it was in the Spirit Not water.
Jesus instructed then to baptize in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost NOT in the name of Jesus. Not once did the apostles baptize as they were instructed, Why? Because the apostles did not have the power (authority) to do so.
Spirit baptism is an operation of God NOT men.
Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead.Col. 2:12
You Said:
"2:38. This baptism was put into practice within 50 days at most of this authorization from Jesus to do so!"
Not so! The baptism of repentance for the remission of sins is the same as the Baptist preached.
John did baptize in the wilderness, and preach the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins. Mark 1:4
Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. Acts 2:38
The old and new what ??
Baptism :doh:
I don’t know that I have one. But if there is or isn’t an OT prophecy regarding the water baptism Jesus authorized in Matthew 28, does that negate that water baptism ??
Yes, it has a high probability of doing so.
Does it void the authority Jesus was given by God and the HS in heaven & earth?
Absolutly not! All power was given to Christ after His manifestation to Israel by the word.
Does it change the fact that this water baptism was taught and practiced by the apostles and disciples ??
The manifestation with power of Christ (the word) by men to Israel continued at Pentecost and that baptism began with John the Baptist.
And I knew him not: but that he should be made manifest to Israel, therefore am I come baptizing with water.
Originally posted by Freak
I understand it was before the New Covenant but it still doesn't change the fact that is was symbolic. Jesus is God-He didn't need the baptism (for anything) but to show us we too need to identify symbolically with Him after justification has occured.
Originally posted by Freak
You said: When Israel accepted that Jesus was the Messiah and obeyed in water baptism their sins were remitted.
Huh? Coming to God was by faith in the Old Covenant as it is in the New Covenant.
It's always been by faith, Jay. They had faith that Jesus was the Son of God. Water baptism was a witness to their testimony.
They had faith in the kingdom message that the Baptist and the apostles preached.
John did baptize in the wilderness, and preach the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins. Mark 1:4
We have faith in His shed blood for remission not water baptism.
Hebrews tell us that... a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth. Heb. 9:17
The message of remission that men preached changed with Paul.
No where will you find Paul preaching a baptism of repentance for the remission of sins.
All one has to do is look at Genesis to see that Abraham was righteous because of his faith not because of his baptism.
All men recieve righteousness by fath in what God reveals with His word. The message of a baptism of repentance was not reveal to Abraham.
You are sadly mistaken, Craig, to think otherwise. Look at the Hall of Faith in Hebrews to see the saints of old who came to God by faith.
I agree that it is by faith. Do you agree that the reveal word of God changed?
Then you go on: Futhermore Paul said that Christ sent me not to baptize but to preach the gospel.
Paul by the Spirit spoke these words and I have faith in them.
But you forgot Paul did in fact baptize. But, as you noted correctly, water does not save it is merely a symbolic act that should be carried out after conversion to Christ through faith.
I did not forget that fact. The new testament does not reveal that water baptism is a sign of what we believe. Water has never saved anyone and salvation has always been through faith in the revealed word of God.
For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith. Rom. 1:17
For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; Rom. 1:18
I don’t which version you may be using but this is NOT what it says in any version I can find. If you continue to choose to READ INTO the passage, no one will ever reach you with the truth! The passage says that Jesus had been granted “ALL authority in heaven and on earth”. This is more – much more, than what you assert. Jesus had already shown and told the disciples He had power to forgive sins on earth. Ex: Luke 7:47.Jesus is telling them that ALL the power to remit sins has been given unto Him.
No way ! What passage do you think supports this ?? Please give it!Before this men had the power or authority to remit sins in water baptism.
Huh??So then the change that occurred is that Jesus received all power not a new water baptism.
Huh??This relinquishing of power coincides with the apostles inability to perform miracles.
Huh?? You are making “blank” assumptions here Craig. These and your remark about Mark 1:8 have no merit, nevertheless any context or connection! As a matter of point, all those verses listed after this point in your post were “disconnected”… at best.The Baptist and Jesus foretold of this relinquishing.
No it isn’t!His baptism as you call it is...but he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost...Mark 1:8
No it is not! John’s baptism was a baptism of REPENTANCE (Acts 19:4). John’s baptism - Luke 3:3 – “looked forward” (“unto”) the remission of sins. Luke 24:47 tells us that REMISSION of sins would BEGIN at Jerusalem. It did in Acts 2:38 –Not so! The baptism of repentance for the remission of sins is the same as the Baptist preached.
Originally posted by Freak
Yes, salvation is by faith in Christ alone but let's not forget that after salvation ones needs to be baptized as a sacrament of the fellowship of the saints.
I disagree.The message of remission that men preached changed with Paul.
No where will you find Paul preaching a baptism of repentance for the remission of sins.
So, was it Spirit baptism Jesus commanded the apostles to perform when He said:You have chosen to believe that Jesus' reference to baptism means in water but that is not what He said....For John truly baptized with water; but (on the contrary) ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence. Acts 1:5
Yes, Jesus foretold of a new baptism but it was in the Spirit Not water.