Cross Reference
New member
The scriptures are replete with passages that declare the Grace of God to be merited, none, when understanding context is in play, to be unmerited. Reform commentators responsible for miscontruing scripture for the benefit preserving grace to be unmerited and that they must do for the purpose of defending their pet doctrines they have bought into that would otherwise find no home in rational reasoning, all summed up in "TULIP".
Once snared, the inability to share the gospel of the good news, the intentions of God for having created mankind, with its adherents is nearly impossible. They cannot reason out the elementary teachings of Jesus Christ, having been stripped of the possibilities by the law of the flesh: "Therefore leaving the elementary teaching about the Christ, let us press on to maturity, not laying again a foundation of repentance from dead works and of faith toward God" Hebrews 6:1 (NASB) simply because they have been convinced, their denials notwithstanding, going on to maturity is necessary. They have been stripped of reasoning powers without realizing they had none up front that they might have more had begun to put them into practice: "So take care how you listen; for whoever has, to him more shall be given; and whoever does not have, even what he thinks he has shall be taken away from him." Luke 8:18 (NASB)
So, that said by Jesus, where must introspection come into play for him who "confesses" Christ? Paul says: "Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates?" 2 Corinthians 13:5 (KJV) Like the man said: "There is theology and there is faith. I don't think we have to have the same theology, but if our faith is based on *wrong* theology, then I believe we are better off not having faith at all." What do you think?
Once snared, the inability to share the gospel of the good news, the intentions of God for having created mankind, with its adherents is nearly impossible. They cannot reason out the elementary teachings of Jesus Christ, having been stripped of the possibilities by the law of the flesh: "Therefore leaving the elementary teaching about the Christ, let us press on to maturity, not laying again a foundation of repentance from dead works and of faith toward God" Hebrews 6:1 (NASB) simply because they have been convinced, their denials notwithstanding, going on to maturity is necessary. They have been stripped of reasoning powers without realizing they had none up front that they might have more had begun to put them into practice: "So take care how you listen; for whoever has, to him more shall be given; and whoever does not have, even what he thinks he has shall be taken away from him." Luke 8:18 (NASB)
So, that said by Jesus, where must introspection come into play for him who "confesses" Christ? Paul says: "Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates?" 2 Corinthians 13:5 (KJV) Like the man said: "There is theology and there is faith. I don't think we have to have the same theology, but if our faith is based on *wrong* theology, then I believe we are better off not having faith at all." What do you think?
Last edited: