The Global Warming Scam: A Bigger SCAM than first Suspected

[gcthomas]

:yawn:

Wake us up when you've got evidence that people are causing the world's temperature to rise, justifying billions of dollars in tax increases.

Wake up, and welcome to the 21st century, Stripe, my old luddite.

It was predicted by Arrhenious over a century ago, and many others since, and the warming is an observed fact now. It is a verified prediction.

You are not competent to pick holes and deny it, unless it is of the form putting your fingers in you ears while singing "I can't hear you". It is what you usually do, after all.

Anyway, you didn't answer the question: did you really think that the Antarctic Change paper you cited proved that global warming wasn't happening? :rotfl:

 

[Stripe]

It was predicted by Arrhenious over a century ago, and many others since, and the warming is an observed fact now. It is a verified prediction.

Moving the goalposts is a logical fallacy.

The Bible predicted global warming 2,000 years ago.

I accept that the Earth is generally heating.

Try to read for comprehension. :thumb:

 

[gcthomas]

Moving the goalposts is a logical fallacy.

The Bible predicted global warming 2,000 years ago.

I accept that the Earth is generally heating.

Try to read for comprehension. :thumb:

You seem to type your answers without thinking if that match the post you are responding to - I am amazed that you are so careless with your reputation here.

You are an idiot. The warming was predicted by scientists before it happened, while no theologians claimed the same: prediction from theory followed by verification by observation and by refinement of the theory, is a classic scientific process. Your arguments are hopeful, but self justifying guff nonetheless.

 

[Totton Linnet]

I BELIEVE in climate change

But I don't believe it is caused by underarm sprays, even exhaust fumes or abandoned fridges in China

All that is the American government covering it's butte by blaming as many and varied a people it can.

There are 2 holes in the ozone.

I believe those holes were caused by the atomic bombs dropped on Japan.

That mushroom cloud is STILL eating it's way upward....I believe it will have the same effect as when an airplane is punctured...I believe all governments know it.

 

[Stripe]

You seem to type your answers without thinking if that match the post you are responding to - I am amazed that you are so careless with your reputation here. You are an idiot. The warming was predicted by scientists before it happened, while no theologians claimed the same: prediction from theory followed by verification by observation and by refinement of the theory, is a classic scientific process. Your arguments are hopeful, but self justifying guff nonetheless.

The challenge to your religion was to provide evidence that might justify the idea that people are causing warming that would justify billions of dollars per year in tax spending.

You have insults, well done.

How about evidence?

 

[gcthomas]

You have insults, well done.

How about evidence?

I was awaiting your comment on the citation you gave:

Anyway, you didn't answer the question: did you really think that the Antarctic Change paper you cited proved that global warming wasn't happening? :rotfl:

So you presented a paper that described climate change as evidence against climate change.

Just what DID you think the paper proved, Stripe? (I predict you will wriggle again, but hey.)

 

[User Name]

Wake us up when you've got evidence that people are causing the world's temperature to rise

What do you think is causing sea levels to rise?

 

[gcthomas]

What do you think is causing sea levels to rise?

He is very keen on asking over general questions, but he is hugely unwilling to actually commit to answers himself.

He will most likely just claim to have answered such questions already in unspecified earlier posts, suggest you learn to read, or try to change to discussion away from the offending questions.

 

[zoo22]

So you presented a paper that described climate change as evidence against climate change.

Just what DID you think the paper proved, Stripe? (I predict you will wriggle again, but hey.)

Well, not only that, it also uses evidence from events that took place thousands of years before Stripe believes the earth even existed.

 

[Stripe]

What do you think is causing sea levels to rise?

How about you present the data instead of begging the question. :up:

 

[gcthomas]

How about you present the data instead of begging the question. :up:

As you know, data is freely available. What is more important is the interpretation. Speaking of which, what did you think the Antarctic paper you cited say about climate change?

 

[Stripe]

As you know, data is freely available.

Then it should not be a problem for you to link to it. :up:

 

[User Name]

How about you present the data instead of begging the question. :up:

http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/sea-level/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise

:up:

 

[gcthomas]

Then it should not be a problem for you to link to it. :up:

I'm sorry that Google is beyond you.

Time for you to answer the question about your cite. It shouldn't be a problem for you. :up:

 

[Stripe]

http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/sea-level/

Great. That's what we're talking about.

Now, do you know the process that is gone through to produce this series?

 

[User Name]

Great. That's what we're talking about.

Now, do you know the process that is gone through to produce this series?

No. Tell us all about it.

 

[gcthomas]

Great. That's what we're talking about.

Now, do you know the process that is gone through to produce this series?

Now tell us about that climate change paper with the evidence about climate change that you presented as evidence against climate change.

:chuckle:

 

[Stripe]

No.

Which is why we ignore you.

 

[User Name]

Which is why we ignore you.

Or you could educate me.

 

[gcthomas]

:dog: <-- Stripe running away from awkward questions. Again. As usual.