Nineveh said:Pardon, but who is drawing a sword first here?
Nin - how old are you???? 5????
"He started it."
Turn the other cheek. Extend a hand.
Is that against your religion, too?
Nineveh said:Pardon, but who is drawing a sword first here?
beanieboy said:Test your honesty. Have I said repeatedly that theologians are split on the issue? Yes or No? Is it true that theologians are split on the issue? Yes or no?
It's something that you practice. I will point it out for you the next time I see it if you wish.
You can twist the bible to say anything, and people used the bible at one time to justify slavery.
But we are talking about homosexuality.
So, should I research the bible, or take the english version at face value?
On the contrary, I look to experts and those who have studied extensively to find out what they have discovered. It's being responsible.
I'm growing tired of your false accusations.
I don't turn the thread on me. I am asked questions, and I simply respond.
Accuse me falsely if you must. I'm simply growing tired of it.
beanieboy said:Nin - how old are you???? 5????
"He started it."
Turn the other cheek. Extend a hand.
Is that against your religion, too?
Nineveh said:Um, beanie, that's a quote from The Edge you got there
Your intent was to be rude, I was simply pointing that out to you. If you really intend to "extend a hand", I'd prefer you not try to slap me with the other.
beanieboy said:You misunderstood my post.
You responded with, "Who's swinging the sword first???"
That's a "he started it" response, and you are the one to start the thread.
Then you start another one against Dave Miller.
Is that all you have to bring to the table? Attacking poster after poster?
Maybe if you didn't start at a confrontational place, you wouldn't be responded to in the same way.
The choice is yours.
Namaste
Nineveh said:When you are finished whining about the inconsequential things, maybe you will actually reply to the important points?
beanieboy said:Test your honesty. Have I said repeatedly that theologians are split on the issue? Yes or No? Is it true that theologians are split on the issue? Yes or no?
It's something that you practice. I will point it out for you the next time I see it if you wish.
You can twist the bible to say anything, and people used the bible at one time to justify slavery.
But we are talking about homosexuality.
So, should I research the bible, or take the english version at face value?
On the contrary, I look to experts and those who have studied extensively to find out what they have discovered. It's being responsible.
I'm growing tired of your false accusations.
I don't turn the thread on me. I am asked questions, and I simply respond.
Accuse me falsely if you must. I'm simply growing tired of it.
I have listed places where experts discuss it.Nineveh said:Here let me help you:
Honestly it doesn't matter what "thorologians" have to say. It matters what God says. Are you going to answer the question? In honesty, you could find a theologian who would agree with you that Jesus wasn't real, if that's what you wanted to do. So let's stick with the Bible. Does the God of the Bible stand against homosexuality both OT and NT?
That's funny. There isn't a word "homosexual" in the original bible, because the word was coined in the 18th century.It says the same thing in Hebrew, Greek and English.
Yours seems to being arrogant, proud, and stubborn.Rather, you look to those who would keep you enslaved to your favorite sin.
Um. I haven't accused you of anything here. Remember, this is about you judging me about bearing a false witness against you. So far I have a promise to have you point out if I do bear a false witness against you, but that's it
Don't you ever get tired of starting something, then when it gets down to buisness, whining your way out of it? Stand up! You leveled a pretty big judgement against me, back it up!
beanieboy said:I have listed places where experts discuss it.
You won't even read what someone who has studied it intensively has found.
That's funny. There isn't a word "homosexual" in the original bible, because the word was coined in the 18th century.
Yours seems to being arrogant, proud, and stubborn.
You constantly accuse me of hijacking threads. That is false witness.
Which you answered by saying I was whining.
When anyone confronts you, you say they are whining. That is your childish way of defending yourself.
Nineveh said:I guess when beanie is done and the edge shows back up?
cattyfan said:do we suspect a connection similar to !!!!First and servent101 ?
(like a soap opera...the evil twin :bannana: :devil: )
Nineveh said:Answer the question.
You mean you of all people don't know what "men laying with men" means?[/quote}
If you would like to start a thread on "Is Homosexuality Biblically Wrong", I can cut and paste what you are too lazy to look up.
In my opinion, looking at both sides, I would have to say no.
I will point them out as they occur from this point on.First, you accuse me of bearing false witness and for your proof you merely offer to "point it out next time". Do you have examples of these charges?
If this be true, you have nothing to worry about. All past accusations I will disregard. Don't accuse me of hijacking a thread, or making about me unjustly, and I will not accuse you of doing it.Except you have this one, haven't you? And I've only made that statement once. So your "constantly accusing" accusation is false.
Stand up! You leveled a pretty big judgement against me, back it up!
At every time I see it, I will now point it out, at your request.
Namaste
beanieboy said:In my opinion, looking at both sides, I would have to say no.
I will point them out as they occur from this point on.
If this be true, you have nothing to worry about. All past accusations I will disregard. Don't accuse me of hijacking a thread, or making about me unjustly, and I will not accuse you of doing it.
At every time I see it, I will now point it out, at your request.