The earth is flat and we never went to the moon
- Thread starter DFT_Dave
- Start date
- Status
musterion
Well-known member
Really?
There must be a space...an area...that contains what we look up and refer to as "space." Let's call it "absolute space." Where did absolute space come from? And where is it? Meaning, what area does it occupy?
Some people believe God created the heavens and earth.
Celestial bodies were to be used for the measurement of time.
Cook did sail around Antarctica and he did it only once and it took him three years. 60,000 miles is 2 and a half times the circumference of the earth which is 24,900 miles. That is evidence of flat earth with an ice wall surrounding it. Antarctica has an ice wall, that is not in dispute.
--Dave
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
I drive roughly 60k miles in about 3.5-4 months, and that's a maximum of 11 hours of driving time at 63 miles per hour per day, with 14 hours of total on-duty time and 10 hours per rest. And that's even taking off every other weekend.
2 years to travel around Antarctica in a boat does not seem unreasonable. And remember, he wasn't sailing in a perfect circle, either (looking at the image you provided above).
Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app
glassjester
Well-known member
There is no curvature whatsoever, there are a few hills and dips that make it .9997, but the overall state is perfectly flat, and that is an accurate and acceptable way to say it.
--Dave
glassjester
Well-known member
If the Earth is flat, surrounded by Antarctica (a wall), then shouldn't we be able to see Antarctica all around us with telescopes?
musterion
Well-known member
It is now -- you said space was not created. If it was not created, it has always existed. If it has always existed, it is eternal. If it is eternal, that refutes Genesis 1.
Are you actually a pagan? If so, out with it, because that's the logical conclusion of what you said IN THIS THREAD.
Sailing 60,000 miles in three years is reasonable saying you went only around the arctic circle is not. The arctic circle is 10,975 miles around it. Cook only went around it once, not 5 times. There is no way he traveled around a continent on the bottom of the earth, he traveled the circle of the flat earth.
--Dave
Read again what I said. I said that he did not sail in a perfect circle.
Here is the image you gave, which confirms this.
How many extra miles did he travel in the times he was NOT directly on the antarctic circle? I'd go so far as to say it was enough to bring it to 60k miles.
Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app
Sorry, not here. I argued this for years at theology online. Perhaps I will do it again, but not on this thread.
--Dave
Read again what I said. I said that he did not sail in a perfect circle.
Here is the image you gave, which confirms this.
How many extra miles did he travel in the times he was NOT directly on the antarctic circle? I'd go so far as to say it was enough to bring it to 60k miles.
Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app
I said he traveled around the arctic circle, did not say or imply that he sailed on it. I'm going to see if I can remove you from this thread.
--Dave
glassjester
Well-known member
Lighten up.
No, it's too far away with too much atmospheric fog, hot to cold water and air, for anyone to do so.
But if you want to see the ice walls of Antarctica all you have to do is google Antarctica ice wall. Here I'll do it for you.
Antarctic Ice Wall
View attachment 25226
Here is a pic of how some one believes the Ice Wall circles the earth. Which looks more like what Cook traveled.
View attachment 25225
--Dave
glassjester
Well-known member
- Status