Greg Jennings
New member
It's not the same. Even if the Earth was flat it wouldn't be the same. There's a headwind and a tailwind
The earth is flat and we never went to the moon
- Thread starter DFT_Dave
- Start date
- Status
It's not the same. Even if the Earth was flat it wouldn't be the same. There's a headwind and a tailwind
Gravity was invented in order to deal with the problem that, according to standard physics, everything would fly off a globe spinning at the speed of sound.
--Dave
Daniel1769
New member
Joshua 10:13 and Isaiah 38:8 both specifically state that the sun is moving through the sky over the earth.
Psalm 93:1 says the earth does not move
Ecclesiastes 1:5 says the sun moves over the earth
There are a few verses that have the earth still and the sun moving.
Daniel1769
New member
It's explained as the density of the object. E.g. I am more dense than the air around me, so I don't float away. The smoke from my chimney is less dense than the air, so it rises. Notice gravity doesn't pull the smoke to the earth.
By using aerodynamics or energy we can counter the density that causes us to fall to earth, like rockets or airplanes. Notice gravity doesn't pull the planes to the ground. It should follow that a force strong enough to hold trillions of gallons of water to the earth should not be incapable of holding smoke or an airplane to the earth.
The visual evidence is powerful, this topic is not arguments, it's visible evidence.
This forum allows for video, and I have watch many.
--Dave
Greg Jennings
New member
Dave that wasn't a fake question.
What do flat earthers say about the other planets?
What do flat earthers say about the other planets?
Jerry Shugart
Well-known member
If it is flat then why do you end up in the same place from where you started when you go due east at the equator?
Will someone please answer this question?
Last edited:
His bus ride to church services doesn't take him that far.
We have the sun, moon, and stars. Other planets? What are stars? It's funny how every time the Apollo astronauts were ask about the stars, they say they didn't really see any and the so called "videos" from the moon don't show any either.
--Dave
Greg Jennings
New member
So are you saying that the entire universe is the flat disk of Earth?
PS: reason you don't see stats in moon landing video is due to their being too dim to pick up by the camera as opposed to the bright lights being cast on the moon's white surface.
It's like if you look into a flashlight and look around in the dark, you can't see anything. But if you wait a minute, your vision adjusts to the dimmer light, and you can pick out details. In the moon landing video, the "flashlight" never was turned off
Go outside tonight and turn on your flash light and see if it blocks out the stars. They could have turned the cameras to the stars and adjusted the lens for all to see.
--Dave
In that case, change it to "primarily aural" and give a listen to the evidence presented.
This is a good video to begin with for those who are interested in a presentation of visual evidence for a flat, stationary earth.
--Dave
Greg Jennings
New member
If I shine the light in my face, I can promise I can't see the stars.
That's what the moon's reflective surface did: reflected bright light bouncing off the surface of the moon back into the camera. It's like shining the flashlight back into your eyes THEN trying to see the stars
This is good too.
They could have turned the cameras to the stars and adjusted the lens for all to see. If they could show us the earth they could have shown us the stars.
--Dave
Greg Jennings
New member
I doubt the cameras they had them were very advanced when compared to what we've got now. Regardless, sunlight would've provided all of the reflected light you'd need to blind a camera to the stars. People have tried to prove this a hoax before by shooting a "moon landing" in the desert. They figured out that getting the stars in focus is next to impossible even in ideal conditions on Earth. Are you familiar with the flag wind part of the moon landing?
But on your second sentence, not true at all. The Earth is massive as seen from the moon. The stars are the same size as we see them from Earth.
So we had the technology to get to the moon, take a picture of the earth but not the stars. I don't think so. Some have argued that the moon, without an atmosphere to interfere with, would be an ideal place to take pics of the stars. In any event, the absence of visible stars from the Apollo mission is one evidence that the videos were shot in a studio and not from the moon.
--Dave
Daniel1769
New member
Edit for technical difficulty.
- Status