Can I post those in one of my threads and then I won't post them hear. The Mason thing and the gnostic or occult stuff is real and permeating every aspect of our lives.
Anyone that's watched one or two of these videos (most from one channel, a man named Will, not an expert, pastor or scientist but he EXPOSES the bad "isms" of the world and preaches Christ crucified. The titles and images or for effect and likely for click bait but there are very substantial points made, more Biblical than anything else and he rarely speaks of flat earth, it's just in his titles.). I'm not calling people that believe in a globe a mason or a liar or a bad evil person. Only in high places of control and influence. The tit'es are outlandish but the videos are totally sane and rational.
Thanks, you just told me you'd let me know about using another thread I already started. I won't be talking about this the rest of my life on here. :chuckle:
To paraphrase the psychiatrist in Fawlty Towers, that line contains enough material for an entire conference.We flatters are still in need of...
You are a lunatic.Why are you trying to change your stance?
Liar. You said it, I challanged it, you defended it, I proved you wrong THEN you started talking about how you never said it.I stand by what I said and I did not say anything about what you are trying to force into my words by your own faulty interpretation of what I said.
I haven't backtracked at all, freak.I never said anything about formal math, which you never said anything about either until your last post when you started backtracking from what you accused.
Repeating yourself doesn't count as a rebuttal, idiot. The reason is because all I have to do to sit you right back in your chair is to repeat myself too!I stand by what I said: you are the one back-pedaling.
I have quoted you directly. I then responded to your own defense of my challenge to your claim that God created math. It wasn't until after I spent a good deal of time explaining the history of math and number theory and the fact that next to none of it existed before 1500 years ago that all of a sudden, you never said it.I did not say what you are accusing me of saying because you misinterpreted what I was saying in your own mind.
Saying it doesn't make it so, daqq.Further, yes, He did.
You did!So what? Who has said that He did?
The Scripture is written in Hebrew: Adam spoke Hebrew and named all of the animals if you believe Gen2:19. Do you also not believe what Gen2:19 says? Where do you suppose Adam received the language and intellect to name every living creature? Here is a clue: look a little more diligently into Gen2:7.
Translation: I have no rebuttal and my brain is on fire!:blabla::blabla::blabla:
Have a nice life.
You are a lunatic.
Liar. You said it, I challanged it, you defended it, I proved you wrong THEN you started talking about how you never said it.
THE THREAD IS ALL STILL HERE FOR EVERYONE TO READ MORON!
I haven't backtracked at all, freak.
You said God created math, I challenged it, you defended it, I proved you wrong THEN you started talking about how you never said it.
THE THREAD IS ALL STILL HERE FOR EVERYONE TO READ MORON!
Repeating yourself doesn't count as a rebuttal, idiot. The reason is because all I have to do to sit you right back in your chair is to repeat myself too!
You said it, I challanged it, you defended it, I proved you wrong THEN you started talking about how you never said it.
THE THREAD IS ALL STILL HERE FOR EVERYONE TO READ MORON!
See how that works!
I have quoted you directly. I then responded to your own defense of my challenge to your claim that God created math. It wasn't until after I spent a good deal of time explaining the history of math and number theory and the fact that next to none of it existed before 1500 years ago that all of a sudden, you never said it.
I frankly don't care what you meant. You said that God created math, which He flat out did not do. Your inability to articulate yourself is not my problem.
Saying it doesn't make it so, daqq.
You did!
If that is not is not a good example of what you meant by God used math throughout the creation then please, by all means, give us an example.
Prediction: You won't do it because anything you give as an example will be essentially identical to the example I used.
Gen2:7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being.
Not a word in there about Adam speaking Hebrew.
Translation: I have no rebuttal and my brain is on fire!
And now we know why daqq is on my ignore list. What a waste of time.
Clete
God did not create math.
You are the liar and lunatic:
You stated that God did not create math, period,
and you said nothing about formal mathematics or any of the constructs of man.
You're no better off than the flat-earthers, atheists, or anyone else you are always bashing. You're a pompous ignoramus who actually does not believe in an all-powerful God.
I watched this video and I am wondering why the presenter made such a big deal about perspective but completely ignored the effect that perspective would have on the size of the sun as it approaches the vanishing point. Perspective says the sun gets smaller. But everytime I watch the sun set, through appropriate safety glass, the sun never gets smaller. Why doesn't the sun obey the "laws" of perspective?The sun sets just fine on flat earth - The math's are wrong perspective
This video is for all those who say, the sun will be visible 24/7 on a flat earth and won't make it any closer than 20 to 30 degrees above the horizon.
Here is an answer from flat earth on globe earth argument.
--Dave
Because He did not.
Did God create darkness? OR did darkness come into existence by God creating light?
In the same way, "math" is a result of God creating the universe.
And you didn't think that "math" includes formal mathematics, etc?
Come on, Daqq. Use your head a bit.
Ad hominem attacks don't help your case, Daqq, nor does making straw men.
Colossians 1:16-17 KJV -
For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:
17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.
Wouldn't all things include maths?
Because He did not.
Did God create darkness? OR did darkness come into existence by God creating light?
Wouldn't this be like saying that GOD did not use math when He created the universe, since it could not exist until after creation?In the same way, "math" is a result of God creating the universe.
In mathematics, how does one differentiate between a singular 1 and a plural 1 when looking at an equation?And you didn't think that "math" includes formal mathematics, etc?
1 Kings 8:12 KJV
(12) Then spake Solomon, The LORD said that he would dwell in the thick darkness.
Not to mention we have scripture specifically saying GOD creates darkness.
Isaiah 45:7 KJV
(7) I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.
The word for "create" is the same used in Genesis 1.
Wouldn't this be like saying that GOD did not use math when He created the universe, since it could not exist until after creation?
In mathematics, how does one differentiate between a singular 1 and a plural 1 when looking at an equation?
I was under the impression that when you add 1 to another 1, you get 2.
But scripture reveals that when you add 1 to another 1, you get 1.
Doesn't the language of mathematics miss the mark on that one?
Just wondering.
...
Did God create darkness? OR did darkness come into existence by God creating light?
...
Scripture says GOD made both.Well that sounds to me like God creates light and then darkness results. It doesn't make much sense to have darkness without light. Everything would be dark. Everything would be the same.
I mean, darkness is simply the absence of light, after all
Well that sounds to me like God creates light and then darkness results. It doesn't make much sense to have darkness without light. Everything would be dark. Everything would be the same.
I mean, darkness is simply the absence of light, after all
This can get mind-boggling!Well that sounds to me like God creates light and then darkness results. It doesn't make much sense to have darkness without light. Everything would be dark. Everything would be the same.
I mean, darkness is simply the absence of light, after all