Right Divider
Body part
You're on a Internet forum and still don't know how to use Google?Did he die?
Nope. :cigar:You're stretchin' now.:chuckle:
You're on a Internet forum and still don't know how to use Google?Did he die?
Nope. :cigar:You're stretchin' now.:chuckle:
You're on a Internet forum and still don't know how to use Google?
Nope. :cigar:
Your vain imaginations, for not a single MADist here has ever said otherwise.You do understand that Jesus was sinless and died as payment for sin NOT Paul right ?
Your vain imaginations, for not a single MADist here has ever said otherwise.
Perhaps we should start a thread on the broken record of Dodge.
You have never heard any MADist here say that Jesus was not sinless.I was told that a person said he was ( Danoh ) baptized unto Paul, and another (danP ) told me Paul was "I AM ".
Maybe we should start a thread how you stick together no matter if you are lying or not !
You have never heard any MADist here say that Jesus was not sinless.
And you have never heard any MADist here say that Jesus did not die for sin.
And you have never heard any MADist here say that Paul was sinless.
And you have never heard any MADist here say that Paul died for sin.
Except in your imagination.
You may think you are an authority, but I have taught children as young as 9 that understand and believe scripture more than YOU.Back where you belong on ignore.
Madist are more like J.W'S, Roman Catholics, Mormons and the rest of the cults.
They all change and change the meaning and context of scripture to make it say what they want it to say.
Bye
MAD=linger:
Why do you purposely confuse yourself ?OT & NT it really isn't that hard unless of course you want to change God's word, which Madist seem to have no problem doing.
Why do you purposely confuse yourself ?
That might be why you stay confused.It's 2P2P that is confusing
Not one thing in my post was untrue.You have never heard any MADist here say that Jesus was not sinless.
And you have never heard any MADist here say that Jesus did not die for sin.
And you have never heard any MADist here say that Paul was sinless.
And you have never heard any MADist here say that Paul died for sin.
Except in your imagination.
Back where you belong on ignore.
Madist are more like J.W'S, Roman Catholics, Mormons and the rest of the cults.
They all change and change the meaning and context of scripture to make it say what they want it to say.
Bye
MAD=linger:
That might be why you stay confused.
My understanding is that there is just one "program" going on, and that one "program" is the same for everyone on earth.
Did he die?
Not one thing in my post was untrue.
Why are you so against the truth and want to run away and hide from it?
Get baptized and join a real church.
Not one thing in my post was untrue.
Why are you so against the truth and want to run away and hide from it?
This does not indicate that those "of the Law" are not Israel. In fact, I'm pretty sure Israel was the only one with the Law. This passage is speaking of something else entirely.Paul didn't elaborate.
Romans 9:6
Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:
Except that they could get back in...
Romans 11:24
For if thou wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert graffed contrary to nature into a good olive tree: how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be graffed into their own olive tree?
Link? Post #?Right above your last post to Jamie.
It is in this specific dialogue.If you had been reading the thread you would realize that that is not the issue at hand.
For what?Scripture?
What did Jamie give me?Jamie already gave it to you.
He didn't preach the gospel of the kingdom. But he did preach about the kingdom. Which is wholly separate.Did Paul teach the kingdom of God? Some say no, do you?
Paul's epistles are not the only ones necessary for understanding; in fact you couldn't understand Paul's epistles without the rest of the Bible. And Paul even wrote that the rest of Scripture was necessary for reproof, instruction, etc.Translated= Un-like the lemmings who follow the piper over the cliff many chose to believe and stay with the scripture ALL of the scripture as opposed to just the teachings of the Apostle Paul as advocated by Madist. It makes one wonder , if the Madist held beliefs were true, why the Holy Spirit even added any writings except Paul's ? Could it be that the Holy Spirit does not teach or advocate MAD beliefs ?
False dichotomy.We are a member of his kingdom or we are not part of his body.
Scripture doesn't teach name calling?I would call you names but I prefer to do as scripture teaches ! You follow YOU not God.
Go ahead and list the MADs here that say there are two "programs" going on at this time. We'll straighten them out.Not in D'ism. The tagline of D'ism is that God is doing/going to do separate things with Israel. I have listened to the materials over 40 years and don't have a confused understanding of them. They have a confused understanding of how the NT uses the OT.
We'll straighten IP out too.He's been asked for those names before. Never provides any. He gets told that it is non-MADs who believe in two programs today (Hagee for one) but he ignores it. MAD will always be guilty of whatever he says we're guilty of and he won't hear otherwise.