And I still didn't get an answer.
Sure you did. I don't think things in the American political scene were quite what you think they were.
You would think. I would love to know Bob's reasoning as well, but thus far all we have is the label.Is it in fact a lie? I'd be interested to hear why Bob thinks Paul is a secular humanist. Bob would be pretty careful about attaching that label to someone for no reason.
Then prove me wrong. I'm a history nut. I study it more so than most subjects.
PatriotBeliever said:claim as a born again Christian
CLAIMING to be a born again Christian does not make someone a born again Christian.
I never said it did, but he like all of us should claim to be if he is in fact a Christian (and that's what a statement of faith should then contain.). The deeds should indicate it to be so.
The point is, Paul, of all politicians (and anyone for that matter) that claim to be a believer, has as much evidence as any of them and more than most. You better be right if you call someone who claims to be your brother a "secular humanist", unless you're doing it for theatrics or other reasons, and then it's just slander and a lie.
Admire what you're doing, PB, but it strikes me as pointless. Kevin has foolishly and stubbornly stuck his heels in and you cannot reason with such a man. This thread's essentially a tail chasing adventure.
I agree but there are still several here who care about the truth and sense the topic was Ron Paul's position on abortion it's a worthy cause. It's all here for everyone to see I apparently it's still being read.
I actually believe young Stephen has dominated the discussion very well throughout. He's consistent and knows a great deal of truth about the topic and issues. I linger here as much to read his posts and replies as much or more than anyone's.
PatriotBeliever said:I agree but there are still several here who care about the truth and sense the topic was Ron Paul's position on abortion it's a worthy cause.
Stephen said:I actually believe young Stephen has dominated the discussion very well throughout.
PatriotBeliever said:He's consistent and knows a great deal of truth about the topic and issues. I linger here as much to read his posts and replies as much or more than anyone's.
Granite said:Admire what you're doing, PB, but it strikes me as pointless. Kevin has foolishly and stubbornly stuck his heels in and you cannot reason with such a man. This thread's essentially a tail chasing adventure.
:yawn:
Kevin, you care to get back on topic or do you just want to keep disparaging the other folks here who do?
The issue boils down to slavish dependence on the federal government, a solution you're suggesting in a fit of emotional ethical situationalism, or dealing with this on a state by state level. You don't understand the danger and foolishness of groveling before the fed, and I doubt you ever will.
It's always going to seem that way when you agree with someone idealogically. However, he would be the first to tell you that we have answered his points and rebuttals with points and rebuttals of our own.
You're only trying to poison the well.
Have you no shame? All you are trying to do is flatter him.
The truth is that you're wrong, you've been shown how wrong you are, and you are relying on a young teenage boy to do what you cannot because of how horribly wrong you are.
Granite said:The issue boils down to slavish dependence on the federal government
Yes, INCLUDING CHINA Stephen!
I care not what you think politically if you cannot agree with that.