drbrumley
Well-known member
:up:
Ted Cruz's newest lie about Donald Trump
- Thread starter Nick M
- Start date
:up:
Do you need time to warm up your copy machine Aaron? (I wouldn't want Aaron to miss a word that I say).
Trump is a sleazy little sociopath. What more harm can a President Hilary Clinton do than Barack Hussein Obama has already done?
Obama redefined the institution of marriage.
(Thanks to Ron Paul), Obama weakened the US military by allowing sexual deviants to openly serve.
He took private medical care and handed it over to a bureaucratic federal government to run.
Donald Trump won't undo any of those (why would he, he's publically supported them), only Ted Cruz will (all of them).
You are angry Nick. (Nick really shouldn't make an attempt at analogies when he's so angry).
Yet in the Fortune Magazine interview he said that he would.
Little things like the Constitution of the United States and getting Congressional approval won't stand in the way of a King Donald Trump.
So King Trump will have the authority to make that decision (money allocated to NATO), but not the decision to remove the US from NATO as he stated in his Fortune Magazine interview?
As shown above: Donald Trump lemmings are violent. I believe that the prosecution can rest it's case on this matter.
I hope every liberal who has rioted or filed lawsuits against Christians get nicely squared in the face.
Yes, the prosecution can rest. The sentence? Nothing, because they all deserve it
Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
As shown above: Donald Trump lemmings are violent. I believe that the prosecution can rest it's case on this matter.
Need we review amongst other things your stance on allowing homosexuals to adopt innocent children?
As shown above: Donald Trump lemmings are violent. I believe that the prosecution can rest it's case on this matter.
Need we review amongst other things your stance on allowing homosexuals to adopt innocent children?
WizardofOz
New member
Nope. Still no answer. When Trump runs against Hillary in the general, who has your vote? Stop deflecting, be brave.
Your consistent need to emphasize 'innocent' is all that needs to be noted of your stance.
'Innocent' children aren't so 'innocent' when they are left in the system rather than given an opportunity at a relatively normal upbringing.
As I've already stated, for conservatives so against taxing and social welfare, you sure are willing to leave children within all that and pay their way so long as it feeds into your bias against gays.
Throwing 'innocent' kids under the bus
Neither. Is that brave enough for you Aaron?
Your turn: Which Libertarian Party candidate are you hoping get's the nod to run on the pro abortion, pro homosexuality, pro recreational drug use Libertarian Party ticket? (But then maybe Aaron is a Donald Trump kinda guy this time around?).
drbrumley
Well-known member
I'm impressed...
as for me, neither, or none of the above....Is that brave enough for you, your majesty?
Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Need we review amongst other things your stance on allowing homosexuals to adopt innocent children?
I'm sure if you asked any child their opinion, they'd much rather (literally) be thrown under a bus than to be pimped out and raped by their 'daddy/daddies'.
Frank Lombard: Homosexual Duke University Professor who raped his 5 year old adopted son and attempted to pimp him out to a undercover police officer.
Pete Truong and Mark Newton: "Shortly after they returned home to the United States with the newborn from Russia, they began a six year siege of sexual abuse which included shopping the child throughout the world to be abused—and videotaped—by at least eight men in the United States, Germany, Australia, and France. Creating a lucrative business for the “parents” of the child through the selling of pornographic photographs and videos on pedophile sites, including the Boy Lovers Network, the district court concluded that the same-sex couple created this child solely for the purpose of sexual exploitation."
Etc. Etc. Etc.
Donald Trump needs your support Crucible.
Need we review amongst other things your stance on allowing homosexuals to adopt innocent children?
Your consistent need to emphasize 'innocent' is all that needs to be noted of your stance.
'Innocent' children aren't so 'innocent' when they are left in the system rather than given an opportunity at a relatively normal upbringing.
As I've already stated, for conservatives so against taxing and social welfare, you sure are willing to leave children within all that and pay their way so long as it feeds into your bias against gays.
Throwing 'innocent' kids under the bus
I'm sure if you asked any child their opinion, they'd much rather (literally) be thrown under a bus than to be pimped out and raped by their 'daddy/daddies'.
Frank Lombard: Homosexual Duke University Professor who raped his 5 year old adopted son and attempted to pimp him out to a undercover police officer.
Pete Truong and Mark Newton: "Shortly after they returned home to the United States with the newborn from Russia, they began a six year siege of sexual abuse which included shopping the child throughout the world to be abused—and videotaped—by at least eight men in the United States, Germany, Australia, and France. Creating a lucrative business for the “parents” of the child through the selling of pornographic photographs and videos on pedophile sites, including the Boy Lovers Network, the district court concluded that the same-sex couple created this child solely for the purpose of sexual exploitation."
Etc. Etc. Etc.
Donald Trump needs your support Crucible.
Save your "your majesty" talk for Donald Trump.
I'd ask what candidate you're supporting, but all I need to do is see who Lew Rockwell is supporting to find that answer.
drbrumley
Well-known member
If only it was that simple....
Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
...I'd ask what candidate you're supporting, but all I need to do is see who Lew Rockwell is supporting to find that answer.
It is, just do an internet search:
Lew Rockwell & Walter Block Throw Support behind Trump
- See more at: http://www.acalltopaul.com/node/1765#sthash.MmHKUpgN.dpuf
Gee, what a surprise.
Patrick jane, ok doser and the rest of TOL's Libertarians wouldn't have anything to do with Donald Trump if they even smelled an iota of Christianity about him.
...I'd ask what candidate you're supporting, but all I need to do is see who Lew Rockwell is supporting to find that answer.
It is, just do an internet search:
Lew Rockwell & Walter Block Throw Support behind Trump
- See more at: http://www.acalltopaul.com/node/1765#sthash.MmHKUpgN.dpuf
Gee, what a surprise.
Patrick jane, ok doser and the rest of TOL's Libertarians wouldn't have anything to do with Donald Trump if they even smelled an iota of Christianity about him.
Non answer. Just like a liberal.
[MENTION=13737]aCultureWarrior[/MENTION]
I would go and post the thousands of cases where adopted children were abused, raped, or even killed by heterosexual parents.
But
There's no point in wasting all that time telling you what you already know.
A bad case of a homosexual adopters is not a reason to be against it anymore than heterosexual adopters. That's just base logic, and you haven't done anything but reveal that you'd have your prejudice before others get what they need.
I would go and post the thousands of cases where adopted children were abused, raped, or even killed by heterosexual parents.
But
There's no point in wasting all that time telling you what you already know.
A bad case of a homosexual adopters is not a reason to be against it anymore than heterosexual adopters. That's just base logic, and you haven't done anything but reveal that you'd have your prejudice before others get what they need.
I ran across this argument in another thread by a homosexual who was 'married' to a guy that had genital mutilation surgery so that he could pretend that he was a woman.
Being that the behavior that you defend makes up around 1-2% of the population, and those that 'marry' and adopt innocent children around 1-2% of that (that's a liberal estimate), you'd have to provide close to 200 cases of heterosexual parents abusing their children (be it biological or adopted) for every 1 incident like this CT homosexual 'couple' (George Harasz and Douglas Wirth) who repeatedly raped 2 of their adopted sons (they had 9 innocent children in their home).
With just three incidents that I've posted as examples, Crucible is going to be a very busy boy finding and posting 600 cases of heterosexual parents molesting their children, (when and if you do, here will be my answer as is my answer with those who engage in homosexuality: "They need God in their lives").
Anyway, you've been exposed enough in other threads for being a secular humanist, no need to do it any further here.
[MENTION=13737]aCultureWarrior[/MENTION]
There have been thousands of cases where heterosexual adopters have abused a child.
I will not spend my time going through the internet because that's simply stupid- my point was made from the first post, and it stands. I'm not going to sit here and convince you of something you already know is the truth.
There have been thousands of cases where heterosexual adopters have abused a child.
I will not spend my time going through the internet because that's simply stupid- my point was made from the first post, and it stands. I'm not going to sit here and convince you of something you already know is the truth.