And you accept this statement. Without a lick of evidence, not one single bit...not even a hint of evidence...to support it.
Just because it's tacked onto the end of this abstract, it must be true. Never mind that all the information we are given completely contradicts it.
I think I'll save a copy of this post of yours to toss back at you.
Because you do realize you have completely and totally discredited yourself here, right?
:nono:
Well I'm not the one that concluded so. The very authors of the paper conclude at the end that their results are not justification for an absolute conclusion that homosexuals have a higher mortality rate. And they do so because they understand that if they did conclude otherwise, it would be dishonest.
What do you think the last few sentences of an abstract are? What do you think an abstract is? It's a synopsis that briefly covers the entire paper. Intro, methodology, results, and conclusions. So the last few sentences of an abstract are a synopsis of the conclusions in the study. This paper has concluded that they do not have sufficient evidence to justify a conclusion that homosexuals have a higher mortality rate. Meaning your evidence is extremely shaky at best. And quite possibly plain false or misleading.