Hey slick, don't play victim.
I'm not. It's the inverse, and you're too old to be a triggered Millennial.
Remember that this is predominantly a MAD board, from the owner on down.
So now you think your localized majority determines overall theology for the Christian faith, and the Mods are here to censor out all other views? Is that what you're insisting?
Pathetic. Gang mentality. And it will never change the fact that Dispensationalism is a 19th-century innovation and heresy.
You knew that when you got here and STILL you enjoyed tossing the gauntlet, even unto this very day.
More bullying bias. Are you continuing to say that Knight is utterly intolerant of any other theological views? What exactly are you trying to say except that this is a tiny little theological pond in the ocean of theological truth, and you guys are the big ducks... so watch out.
The majority is not the determination of truth; and if it were, you'd ALL be wrong and disallowed overall. Open Theism didn't even exist when Dispensationalism got its birth. So if you're appealing to numbers, it's both naive AND another of your logical fallacies.
Freelight is given more freedom than anyone on this board. So don't even try to play that card.
So you going to tell us in one simple, non-technical sentence what faith is, or not?
I sure will. No need to make such a dramatic production like a progressive Millennial.
Let's start with one simple teensie-weensie itsy-bitsy plain and unchangeable fact...
Faith... IS A NOUN. It's not a verb. Faith is "the thing believed".
There's a wealth of lexicography that can follow that, but it's that simple to begin.