Should Victimhood Grant Immunity From Inspection?

[ok doser]

I've seen this argument made in my "On Cowards and Heroes" thread and in more than a few rape threads lately.

What do you think?

Should the mere fact that someone has been a victim of wrongdoing automatically make their behavior (which may or may not have been contributory) exempt from examination?

 

[glorydaz]

I've seen this argument made in my "On Cowards and Heroes" thread and in more than a few rape threads lately.

What do you think?

Should the mere fact that someone has been a victim of wrongdoing automatically make their behavior (which may or may not have been contributory) exempt from examination?

Oops, you have the word rape up there. :chew:

 

[Eeset]

Surely Town should contribute to this thread.

 

[bybee]

Surely Town should contribute to this thread.

Why?

 

[Tambora]

“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results”.

 

[ok doser]

“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results”.

it's not the same thing :duh:

 

[Rusha]

“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results”.

So it seems ...

 

[Tambora]

So it seems ...

Get ready for a slew of scenarios and hypotheticals.
:rotfl:

 

[glorydaz]

I've seen this argument made in my "On Cowards and Heroes" thread and in more than a few rape threads lately.

What do you think?

Should the mere fact that someone has been a victim of wrongdoing automatically make their behavior (which may or may not have been contributory) exempt from examination?

The cops know there are two sides to every story...which is why they always get statements from both, if possible. Sometimes they charge both (mutual combat, for instance). Sometimes the one who sustains the most damage is the only one found to be at fault. So, the answer is NO....

 

[Rusha]

Get ready for a slew of scenarios and hypotheticals.
:rotfl:

It would much easier if the OP just stated ... "morality is relative ... depending on who commits the violation".

 

[ok doser]

Get ready for a slew of scenarios and hypotheticals.
:rotfl:

nah - not gonna bother - you and rusha are too retarded to understand them

 

[glorydaz]

It would much easier if the OP just stated ... "morality is relative ... depending on who commits the violation".

That's the point. Morality is not relative. Even victims can be committing immoral behavior. Immoral behavior that can result in some other immoral behavior being committed against them.

Morality is only relative to those who don't admit certain behavior is immoral when it clearly is.

 

[Tambora]

Morality is only relative to those who don't admit certain behavior is immoral when it clearly is.

Could be.
Let's see ....
Is dating another woman while you are still married moral behavior?

 

[ok doser]

Get ready for a slew of scenarios and hypotheticals.
:rotfl:

why, go right ahead

Is dating another woman while you are still married moral behavior?

nope

 

[ClimateSanity]

why, go right ahead



nope

Are you still married to another woman?

 

[glorydaz]

Could be.
Let's see ....
Is dating another woman while you are still married moral behavior?

Nope...neither is lusting...neither is stripping....neither are any number of things.

 

[ok doser]

Are you still married to another woman?

my divorce is not finalized, hence, i am not dating

soon i will be free

 

[Tambora]

Could be.
Let's see ....
Is dating another woman while you are still married moral behavior?

Nope...neither is lusting...neither is stripping....neither are any number of things.

What does a man deserve to happen to him for dating a woman while he is married?

 

[ClimateSanity]

my divorce is not finalized, hence, i am not dating

soon i will be free

So, evidently its a crime to make friendly talk with a librarian regardless of age if you are still legally married. I didn't know they called that dating now a days either. It's also evidently a crime to make up a hypothetical situation for debate purposes about said librarian.

 

[ok doser]

So, evidently its a crime to make friendly talk with a librarian regardless of age if you are still legally married. I didn't know they called that dating now a days either. It's also evidently a crime to make up a hypothetical situation for debate purposes about said librarian.

that's about the gist of it :idunno: