Agape4Robin
Member
Deal....but one at a time, ok?Imrahil said:Wait a minute, let's make a deal. I'll answer your question after you answer the ones I've already asked, ok?
Surr was first.............
Deal....but one at a time, ok?Imrahil said:Wait a minute, let's make a deal. I'll answer your question after you answer the ones I've already asked, ok?
A theocracy is rule by God. I think I'd have a hard time implementing it but if God decides he wants to rule America, I don't think he'd be worried about the Constitution. :chuckle:BillyBob said:A theocracy is unConstitutional.
Imrahil said:A theocracy is rule by God. I think I'd have a hard time implementing it but if God decides he wants to rule America, I don't think he'd be worried about the Constitution. :chuckle:
Point one.........morality evolved? Interesting......:think: Then in approximately 5000 years of human civilization, why are we not more morally sound?Surr said:Morality and religion do not go hand in hand. Morality evolved in people before people created religion. Just look at other large-brained mammals. Studies have shown that they too can differentiate between right and wrong.
Yes, I do. Explain yourself.
Judge a homo for being one, and put him or her to death.....not my place.Imrahil said:Judge what? How does that affect what the Bible says?
It's not your place to execute them, no. It is the responsibility of the government. I'm not advocating anarchy or vigilantism. I'm saying the government should have Biblically based laws and enforce them. It is your place to judge on a personal basis. The Bible says to judge not by appearance but with righteous judgement because we will be judging the angels and the world.Agape4Robin said:Judge a homo for being one, and put him or her to death.....not my place.
Unless you are judging wrongly or hypocritically, you have done no wrong. Judging with righteous judgment is Biblical.God says I will be judged by the same standards with which I judge........I can be harsh, so I don't want to go there.
BillyBob said:Well, until God takes clear control of the US, I'll stick with the Constitution.
Warning someone is quite different than judging someone.Imrahil said:It's not your place to execute them, no. It is the responsibility of the government. I'm not advocating anarchy or vigilantism. I'm saying the government should have Biblically based laws and enforce them. It is your place to judge on a personal basis. The Bible says to judge not by appearance but with righteous judgement because we will be judging the angels and the world.
In fact, by judging sinners, you are showing them the truth because unless they are warned, they will not turn from their ways and repent. We are told to warn the wicked of their wicked ways. How are we to do that if we can't judge who is righteous and who is wicked?
Unless you are judging wrongly or hypocritically, you have done no wrong. Judging with righteous judgment is Biblical.
I'm not saying He is going to. In fact, I don't see it happening. However, would you stick with the constitution if it still legalized race-based slavery or if it were amended to permit heinous crimes?BillyBob said:Well, until God takes clear control of the US, I'll stick with the Constitution.
Imrahil said:I'm not saying He is going to. In fact, I don't see it happening. However, would you stick with the constitution if it still legalized race-based slavery or if it were amended to permit heinous crimes?
But how do you warn them if you don't know if they are a sinner or not? Don't you first have to judge whether they are or are not?Agape4Robin said:Warning someone is quite different than judging someone.
Actually, Jesus had no legal authority to do anything. HE was a jew and the Jews had no power to execute criminals. We don't know if there were sufficient witnesses to condemn her and where was the man anyway? He was in all likelihood a friend of the Pharisees. The Pharisees were setting Jesus up. They were trying to draw him into a conflict with the Roman officials by tricking him into defying their authority and sentencing her to death. He was obviously smarter than them and once again avoided their attempts to trap him.Remember the woman caught in adultery? By Law, Jesus had every right to judge the woman and put her to death by stoning her. He showed her mercy instead.
Point one.........morality evolved?
Interesting...... Then in approximately 5000 years of human civilization, why are we not more morally sound?
We are not alking about animals here. Let's deal with humans....shall we?
Homos have no control over their behaviour? That makes it ok?
True, but that's not my point. My point is you are putting your trust in a document that can change to say anything depending solely on those in power.BillyBob said:Just because I support our Constituion doesn't mean I participate in every 'freedom' it allows.
Additionally, God has the authority to forgive someone and pardon them from the consequences. We as humans have the authority to forgive someone for sins against us (if they are repentant)but we are not allowed to set aside the penalties God established.Agape4Robin said:Warning someone is quite different than judging someone.
Remember the woman caught in adultery? By Law, Jesus had every right to judge the woman and put her to death by stoning her. He showed her mercy instead.
My point is you are putting your trust in a document that can change to say anything depending solely on those in power.
I said approximately.........Surr said:LMAO, yes!
Humans have existed for a little longer than that.
Mammals....not animals. Maybe your family "evolved" from monkeys, but I was made in the image of God.Humans are animals.
Nothing has proved that homosexuality is "genetic"....that fraudulent "research" was debunked long ago!Yes, homosexuality is natural. If you are a born a certain way, it makes it natural. I was born with brown hair. My hair is naturally brown. Being as my descendents are from Northern Europe, I have light skin. My skin is naturally a lighter shade of tan.
Imrahil said:True, but that's not my point. My point is you are putting your trust in a document that can change to say anything depending solely on those in power.
I realize it is rare but the point is that means that what is the law is relative, depending on what we want it to be. That is wrong.BillyBob said:It's not that easy. Do you know how many times the Constitution has been ammended over the past 230 years? 17 times! That's about once every 15 years!!!
It takes a lot of effort to ammend the Constitution, which is one the great things about it.
We also have the capacity to forgive evnthose who are unrepentant. Forgiveness is not just for the offender, but for the offended.Imrahil said:Additionally, God has the authority to forgive someone and pardon them from the consequences. We as humans have the authority to forgive someone for sins against us (if they are repentant)but we are not allowed to set aside the penalties God established.
Do you?Surr said:I know of another document like that.