Just Tom
New member
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1064863&postcount=2143Gerald said:I'm betting Tom won't come anywhere near this...
Already answered his lame questions he don't even know..
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1064863&postcount=2143Gerald said:I'm betting Tom won't come anywhere near this...
I was just going to let them live in their delusion.Just Tom said:http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1064863&postcount=2143
Already answered his lame questions he don't even know..
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Lighthouse again.Lighthouse said:I was just going to let them live in their delusion.
- learn proper English.Just Tom said:http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1064863&postcount=2143
Already answered his lame questions he don't even know..
You didn't answer my question. "No, you see. Here's the problem. You don't know the history of psychiatry. I do." - Tom Cruise Sorry, the mad raving made me think of everyone's favorite scientologist. Yes, I'm sure you've read a lot of books by some very misguided authors who probably celebrate the anniversary of Matthew Shepard's brutal murder.Just Tom said:1) Obviously more than you since I know the history and psychology of it..
Didn't answer this question, either. I asked how much time you spent thinking and writing about homosexuality not because I believe you are a child abuser, but because I think you have an unhealthy obsession with the topic. Further, if protecting children from abuse was your only concern, you should equally be denouncing priests who abuse young alter boys or could volunteer with organizations like Child Advocates that help children who have been abused.Just Tom said:2) If I think about preventing and opposing child abuse does that make me a child abuser? Only think about it when it is thrown in my face everyday in the news on the radio this culture is saturated by them now since it was taken off the list of mental disorder. And society has to change now not them. So anyone who resists is labeled one of them to discount them. Funny how soicopathic that is isn't it? They will use your inner, but openly hidden, natural disgust for homos to discount and label those who oppose them as really homo, it is only okay to hate or ignore discount someone who is a homo if you label them a closeted one. Then discrimination based on sexual orientation is okay.. You all are infected...
Tom, you slippery bigot you.. I asked you a question that everyone else understood: has a gay man every tried to hit on you (you know, he would come up behind you at a bar, maybe put his hands on the small of your back, and whisper seductively into your ear, "hey cowboy, I'm looking for someone to lasso tonight", something along those lines. (I can't help it if you or anyone else reading the previous sentence was in any way aroused..Just Tom said:3) I have had a negative experience with every homo I have meet for the past 20+ years. They all make advances dummy,, Sex between men is the homo replacement for male bonding, It is a compulsive sexual disorder read a book dude...
Ok, now you're just not even trying. I specifically asked you, "who specifically should be responsible for finding the homosexuals". Your answer: "Anyone."Just Tom said:4) Yes
5) Anyone
6) The Criminal Justice system
And thus you blind atheists are the very definition of insane: coming here day after day expecting the answer to change.Gerald said:But anyone you try to share it with is Simply Out of Luck.
OF, if you have a problem with this post, by all means, let me know with a response in this thread. Don't neg rep me with this: :down: as the explanation.eisenreich said:[snip]
I don't think you're a homosexual, Tom. I don't think you're in denial, either. I believe you are a seriously flawed human being who would benefit immensely from professional help.
Lighthouse said:Really? You mean like, in Judaism? Dee dee dee.
Most sexual immorality would be a capital offense. Adultery, bestiality, rape, child molestation, incest...
No, you don't. But whose fault is that?
My problem is that you, a pre-pubescent, faithless, commie would attempt to give psychological advice.eisenreich said:OF, if you have a problem with this post, by all means, let me know with a response in this thread. Don't neg rep me with this: :down: as the explanation.
On Fire said:My problem is that you, a pre-pubescent, faithless, commie would attempt to give psychological advice.
I can neg rep any way I choose.
eyesinrear? Hardly.Granite said:Very mature.
I did kmoney. It's way back on page # 126 post # 1887 :readthis:kmoney said:BMN, care to give your thoughts on the verses I posted in 1 Timothy?
They know it's in there because homosexuality has become the premier sin for Christians to hate.eisenreich said:What continues to surprise me as I read through the bible for the first time is the amount of context that is lost on the majority of modern readers. Most of my friends who are believers know the basic tenets of Christianity; basically enough so they feel comfortable with their salvation. Though despite their limited knowledge, they also adopt the stigma against gays. They don't exactly know where the bible says such things, but they know it's in there. I believe their apathy on the subject is irresponsible, especially when they are basing their moral beliefs on a book such as the bible.
That link didn't work.Certainly! I applaud the fact that people such as yourself take the time to investigate these problems further, rather than simply accepting them because a few literally-read verses agree with what you would want them to say. The bible is an extremely complex document because of the matter in which it was compiled and the sheer number of circumstances unique to the writers during the first few centuries. It's not that I'm trying to rationalize away or circumvent these verses; on the contrary, I'm trying to get to the truth.
If you are being honest with yourself, you cannot find any truths in obscure verses such as these by doing a literal reading with modern eyes, giving no respect as to context or taking into account cultural awareness of the time in which the piece was written.
From everything I've read by professionals of etymology and greek language, it appears the true meaning of what Paul meant by the term will never be known. The following quote sums up my opinion on the subject.
Not a bad list. Why would it result in the downfall of America?I appreciate the fact that many on ToL back up their beliefs on homosexuality with equally harsh punishments for adultery. However, words are merely words and actually attempting to implement biblical laws on modern-day America would, in my opinion, result in the downfall of this country. This may be digressing from the topic, but if America was to base our system of law on an ancient set of commandments, it should be those of Solon, not Moses. Solon was an Athenian lawmaker who lived until 558 bce; here were his commandments:
What do you believe the verses are talking about? You said your thoughts are that paragraph you quoted, so does that mean you don't know what the verses mean?If the verses in the bible do not condemn homosexuality in any form, which I believe, and Christians were to agree with you and put it on the same level as fornication; that would be a significant step forward.
Of course I can.xMinionX said:Yup. And ancient babylonian. But can you find a secular reason that society might prohibit murder? I bet you can find many. I know I can.
Homosexuality victimizes all of society.I can only agree with those crimes that actually have a victim (child molestation, rape).
Actually, I blame you.I know you're gonna say 'teh gays' in response to whatever I say, so we'll skip right to the part where I say: What about my completely clean gay friend who has never had a disease and is in a monogamous relationship? Is he at fault? (Of course if you weren't going to say that, then please correct me)
I hear that!!! I have taken a vacation from the "unchosen frozen"Granite said:The bigotry and ignorance getting spewed around here is repetitious and old.
3.14159 said:Has anyone given a nonbiblical reason to put homosexuals to death (or even criminalize homosexuality)? I await a response...
Yeah it's in there somewhere, but I forget where exactly. You better just read all 149 pages to find it.....:chuckle:3.14159 said:Has anyone given a nonbiblical reason to put homosexuals to death (or even criminalize homosexuality)? I await a response...
Apologist said:Because it mocks nature itself and the sanctity of life.