Ditto :chuckle: Unfortunately so. :sigh:
And at fault is the liberal, who prefers to talk race, religion, medication and health in his desperation to avoid justice.
Ditto :chuckle: Unfortunately so. :sigh:
Watching politicians squirm out of admitting racism played a part, or that maybe--juuuuuuuust maybe--South Carolina should've lowered their state capitol's rebel flag, is just downright pathetic.
"We say this not because we're trying to sow division, but rather because we're trying to sow unity — a unity of purpose, a unity of commitment, a unity of resolve — so that we confront the racism in our midst. "And that means, certainly symbolically, we cannot have the Confederate flag waving in the state capitol." |
Reuters talked to the shooter’s uncle, Carson Cowles. Cowles stated that Roof was given a .45-caliber pistol by his father in April as a birthday present. This is one month after Roof was arrested in March on drug charges. It is not known at this time if Roof’s father was aware of the drug charges, or if he knew that the charges clearly made his son a “prohibited person” according to ATF From 4473, question 11.e., which disqualifies “unlawful users” of controlled substances from owning firearms.
Gun control supporters will no doubt attempt to assert that so-called “universal” background checks would have prevented the transfer. Rational people know that such a claim isn’t remotely grounded in reality, and that background checks are routinely ignored in transfers between family members, even in states where they are already required.
with all this talk about the second amendment, how do liberals on this forum reconcile the fact that all gun restriction laws that they wanted passed wouldn't have stopped Dylann Roof from using his legally obtained .45-caliber handgun. I've also noticed the bias in the media reporting on gun used since it wasn't an "evil assault" rifle.
your murder rates significantly higher than most similar developed countries, the number of guns in circulation and your gun culture are the main reasons why.
Not just lowered, removed. This event is evidence of ongoing hatred in the community.
The head of the NAACP has called for the flag to be removed:
"We say this not because we're trying to sow division, but rather because we're trying to sow unity — a unity of purpose, a unity of commitment, a unity of resolve — so that we confront the racism in our midst.
"And that means, certainly symbolically, we cannot have the Confederate flag waving in the state capitol."
News Story
so would the Nazis, Mao's communist China, white slave owners, and any other human rights oppressive regime.id scrap the 2nd amendment and ban the lot.
I made this post in 2012 when the sandy hook shootings took place but its worth re-posting.your murder rates significantly higher than most similar developed countries, the number of guns in circulation and your gun culture are the main reasons why.
is private ownerships of guns worth 8000 american lives net every year?
Instead of demanding justice and a redaction of the regulations that brought about this crime, liberals want a flag removed. lain:
Nope. Demonstrably untrue.
The reason is the combination of easy access to weapons and regulations that keep law-abiding people unarmed.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. |
They should either be restricted more or people that have them need to have better education as to how to use them.
Evolutionists love false dichotomies.Hmm so in your definition, regulation of guns is always bad?
Why? Do you think every child old enough to hold a handgun should have one? Should every single adult have one regardless of cognitive ability, mental stability, criminal record etc.?You have not thought through this issue even slightly.
Adding an "education" requirement is a restriction. Adding restrictions is adding to the problem.
His gun was legally purchased by his father. It was illegal for the shooter to be given or purchase the gun himself since he had pending felony charges against him.Guns are widely accessible. Regulations mean the people who respect the rule of law are at a disadvantage in situations like OP.
False flag? I was talking about a *literal* flag. :doh:If you're looking for a solution to OP, you're going in exactly the wrong direction.
And the false flag issue you raised was entirely worthless.
Evolutionists love false dichotomies.
I appreciate that you are desperate for something to talk about that is not the simple point I made, but your rabbit trails will not avail you.Why? Do you think every child old enough to hold a handgun should have one? Should every single adult have one regardless of cognitive ability, mental stability, criminal record etc.?
Therefore, something. :idunno:His gun was legally purchased by his father. It was illegal for the shooter to be given or purchase the gun himself since he had pending felony charges against him.
Or you could be a black man sitting in a church.Making something illegal or restricted means it is more difficult to get, most importantly quickly. Someone that wants a gun quickly probably isn't wanting to use it for a good purpose.
Because they do not have the situation I described. Regulations are the problem. When you're willing to be part of the solution, let us know. :up:Some people will always get guns illegally. The question is how to regulate them effectively. Despite your protestations, most developed countries other than the USA have very few deaths from gun violence. There's a reason for that.
:chuckle:False flag? I was talking about a *literal* flag. :doh:
Nope. Regulations are not inherently bad. However, they are never an answer to evil.False? You've been railing on how gun regulation is always bad through this entire thread!
Liberty is more than important than security. Governments never relinquish power once they've taken more of it.