They can sure creep up a song.
It is fascinating how the Heritage-not-Haters seem to show up reliably when people talk about taking down the flag, but when it is used for more explicitly racist and violent purposes, they're never there to object.
Yeah, they're not knocking the Oklahoma protesters at all, and never really care about who "misappropriates" their beloved symbol.
Ah yes, the good old "never" word.
Surely not reflective of a reasoned and factual argument?
It's just as effective as pedantic literalistic nitpicking last time I checked.:yawn:
As expected, the "yawn" and the putdown.
How very predictable and banal you are.
When was the last time you paused to consider that another poster just might have a modicum of good will?
Depends on the poster and the content, wouldn't ya say?
In part, yes. But "trying" to keep an open mind, even with posters who offend me, has been beneficial for me.
Meanwhile, in a thread about nine people being murdered, a flag is all the liberals want to talk about. Forget justice.
Yeah...well they can't really, can they. What I mean is that their entire line is tied into being as general as they possibly can in addressing the subject because once you get into the details it goes to the devil.It is fascinating how the Heritage-not-Haters seem to show up reliably when people talk about taking down the flag, but when it is used for more explicitly racist and violent purposes, they're never there to object.
The injustice of the fact that he is still alive, for one.There's not much more to say about the murders at this point. It was a cowardly, horrific act and the creature responsible is in the process that will lead to either his conviction or institutionalization. So what does that leave to talk about?
See, that's not really talking about the murders. It's talking about what you want to do about it, about your larger issue on what constitutes the justice you mean to apply to him.The injustice of the fact that he is still alive, for one.
Bull.It is fascinating how the Heritage-not-Haters seem to show up reliably when people talk about taking down the flag, but when it is used for more explicitly racist and violent purposes, they're never there to object.
The 'sickness' is something you have let creep into your heart and then removed any wiggle-room.Same here. That said, I have zero patience for any apologists who defend this flag or the culture it represents. It's a symbol of a larger problem and a symptom of a sickness I can't abide or respect.
Bull.
There are numerous folks here that object to the Klan. And we don't have a problem with kicking their butts.
We fight against their (Klan) ignorance, just as as we fight against the ignorance of those that fall for any self-distorted definition of a symbol to distract from the real core of the problem.
I don't give them the authority to lead me by the nose and dumb-down the definition of a symbol for me, and use it to distract.
The 'sickness' is something you have let creep into your heart and then removed any wiggle-room.
I have a Confederate flag.
If by having that flag, you see me as racist against blacks; then your mind does indeed have a sickness.
It's your heart problem, not mine.
Would you agree some symbols are so provocative their "intended" meaning can be irrelevant if they carry enough baggage?
Would you agree that not everything means the same thing to all people, if its racist to you, then don't fly one. Easy.
How far would you be willing to follow this?
Wouldn't conforming to and perpetuating the baggage be kinda stupid in a nose-lead kind of way?Would you agree some symbols are so provocative their "intended" meaning can be irrelevant if they carry enough baggage?