SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Who is "Packer and Waltke?" Are they a couple of Pizza delivery guys, also?
He spends his time on TOL looking down upon us simple simpletons.
Who is "Packer and Waltke?" Are they a couple of Pizza delivery guys, also?
Amazon.com
"The Elementary Principles of the World" in BAPTIST REFORMATION REVIEW, 1980.
Check Am Assoc Pop Culture back in 90, 91 (I don't remember if the invite was given in 90 while the conference in San Antonio was in 91)
My master's thesis at Regent College, Vancouver, BC was on the New Age architect C. Alexander (Berkeley)'s "Tao" of Building. 1987.
Cut and paste?
He spends his time on TOL looking down upon us simple simpletons.
I could go for a large pepperoni
Some sausage and extra sauce would be nice.
Are you good at other things besides evasion?
You are just massively clueless about God's plans and purposes.
:chuckle::chuckle:
Last chance, GM. Comment on the OP's actual question or so long.
You are referring to the new covenant or the new testament?What do you say is its context? I don't think you know that yours is 2P2P instead of the NT's own.
Because he's just a simple grammar scholar. One that cannot tell the difference between capitalization and ALL CAPS.IP's profile page says that he's a delivery driver.
Why is he snubbing his nose at us unlearned pions?
That's perfect, since you spout pop religion.I have an MCS from the grad school where Packer and Waltke taught. I have been an interim pastor. I have one item on NT background published. I have published the rest on my own. In the early 90s, I was invited to speak at the American association of Pop Culture because of my essay on 'nature' in the period known as 'Young Germany.'
I have an MCS from the grad school where Packer and Waltke taught. I have been an interim pastor. I have one item on NT background published. I have published the rest on my own. In the early 90s, I was invited to speak at the American association of Pop Culture because of my essay on 'nature' in the period known as 'Young Germany.'
That's perfect, since you spout pop religion.
That's perfect, since you spout pop religion.
You are referring to the new covenant or the new testament?
The new covenant is clearly part of the context of the book, hence the name HEBREWS.
But the majority of references to the new covenant about how it saves (justifies) the Gentile believers. So I can tell from your question that you don't know how to disassemble your presuppositions.
But the majority of references to the new covenant about how it saves (justifies) the Gentile believers. So I can tell from your question that you don't know how to disassemble your presuppositions.