musterion
Well-known member
A prophecy doesn't work that way. Usually it is composed of short sentences.
Keep calling Christ a liar.
A prophecy doesn't work that way. Usually it is composed of short sentences.
Keep calling Christ a liar.
It has nothing to do with Christ.
Yes it does. Go troll somewhere else.
It's you who is trolling to say that a biblical prophecy is not a prophecy at all!
Go trolling else where to say how biblical prophecies don't work.
Stop calling Christ a liar, troll.
Psalms 110 KJV
1 The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand,until I make thine enemies thy footstool.
2 The Lord shall send the rod of thy strength out of Zion:rule thou in the midst of thine enemies.3 Thy people shall be willing in the day of thy power,in the beauties of holiness from the womb of the morning:thou hast the dew of thy youth.4 The Lord hath sworn, and will not repent,Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek.5 The Lord at thy right hand shall strike through kings in the day of his wrath.6 He shall judge among the heathen,he shall fill the places with the dead bodies;he shall wound the heads over many countries.7 He shall drink of the brook in the way:therefore shall he lift up the head.
Well, musty-I need to remind you the tenants, principles, of Preterism/Barbituaritism:When did the Romans do all that, Brother John? I mean, it HAD to already have happened...
Well, musty-I need to remind you the tenants, principles, of Preterism/Barbituaritism:
1. Fulfilled AD 70,
2. According to Josephus,Wikipedia,.....,
3. Fulfilled in Christ,
4. Figurative...metaphor...symbolic....,
4. Fulfilled AD 70.
One of these stumps everyone.
Luke 19 does record a prophecy against Jerusalem, and her children. In that prophecy the phrase Luke 19:44 ... they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another.. "IS used, BUT, that phrase does NOT specify Jerusalem, like you are pretending.Luke 19 speaks of all Jerusalem left with not one stone upon another. That didn't happen. Josephus said so.
I forgot #5 tenant:Man, a lot of Bible stuff happened in 70 AD without anybody knowing it. Amazing how only now we are smart enough to see it.
Preterism is ridiculous.Man, a lot of Bible stuff happened in 70 AD without anybody knowing it. Amazing how only now we are smart enough to see it.
I forgot #5 tenant:
5. Signs are invisible.
Luke 19 does record a prophecy against Jerusalem, and her children. In that prophecy the phrase Luke 19:44 ... they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another.. "IS used, BUT, that phrase does NOT specify Jerusalem, like you are pretending.
AND the context proves Jesus was standing next to the temple when he gave that prophecy. AND Josephus CLEARLY describes this level of destruction regarding the Jews themselves destroying the temple, and the Roman soldiers pillaging it!
AND Matthew makes it VERY clear;
Matt 24:1-2 And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple.2 And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.
Your point fails.
No, your point fails, the temple was destroyed, and has been destroyed for over 19 centuries. The Bible is accurate, yet you seem to want to find "apparent" contradictions, for some reason!!No, the point stands. Josephus records various towers were left standing intact.