thborn
Agreed. So its absurd to believe and teach that Christ died for all without exception since all without exception aren't reconciled to God by His death while being enemies. You agree ?
Yes. I personally would not use the word 'absurd,' out of respect for God and the the sense of the fullness of his love expressed in Scripture. Nor is the issue vital to how the Believer should act in this life (out of radical love and denial of self, though this is really God working in us).
But from a purely logical and technical standpoint I agree with you.
Here are a few reasons why:
1. While on earth, it may be that Jesus did not know everything that was to happen to the degree that the Father does. But he taught that some were ultimately going to eternal punishment.
2. Romans 9, at least in the translation I'm using, states that some are destined for destruction. As long as this is true for one person, then Christ did not die for all.
I'm sure you've often had people bring up Romans 5:18-19, which has the phrase "justification that brings life for all men" and then in the next verse uses the term "the many."
I think there are ways to reconcile this with the verses that speak of predestination. Perhaps it's a matter of translation? Or perhaps it's that, yes, life was made available to all in some sense, and though all might be able to witness and experience it, not all are spiritually able to possess it?
There are a couple strains expressed in Scripture in regards to determinism, and I do not believe the Believer has to completely reconcile them in order to have eternal life or teach authentically. For example, there's the question of why we are encouraged to makes requests and pray for others if much is predestined. There's the question of why and in what sense God predestines some for destruction if God's love is also vast, powerful, ultimate, and unequaled (which it is). I don't hold that one must or necessarily can reconcile these questions in this life.